preview

Summary: The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks

Better Essays

The concept of ethics has existed as long as human beings have fostered conscious thought. Whether it be with respect to civil rights, animal rights, individual health and autonomy, or religion, consideration for others’ welfare is at the core of humanity. That is, until prejudice, mistrust, greed, and ignorance corrupt our morals and cloud our collective judgment. The tragic story of Henrietta Lacks, indicative of deep racial divides across the world and the financial, political, social, and scientific fields that perpetrate racially-based injustice, is a reminder of these corruptions. Rebecca Skloot, author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, effectively characterized the plight of the Lacks family and the modern implications of …show more content…

In this passage, she criticized American medical society and culture as a whole by relaying accurate, relevant facts. According to Skloot, “there’s no record of Hopkins and Gey accepting money for HeLa cells, but many for-profit cell banks and biotech companies have… there [are] more than seventeen thousand patents involving HeLa cells” (194). In addition, up until the late 20th century, “scientists and journalists around the world continued to call [Henrietta] Helen Lane” (196). Skloot proved that the world had profited from Henrietta’s cells for decades without any credit or apology given to the nonconsenting donor, without anyone in Henrietta’s family being told of her exploitation. This again substantiated her purpose of narrating the real story of Henrietta, but beyond that, this supported Skloot’s objective of lambasting 21st century American medical society. When asserting these truths, Skloot had the purpose of holding the modern scientific community accountable for the actions of its predecessors and the intention of procuring reparations for the Lacks family. Therefore, Skloot knew there need be no analysis nor explanation accompanying these expositions; the facts spoke for themselves. The raw veracity of her words charged Henrietta’s doctors at John Hopkins- as well as the collective body of HeLa researchers- with malpractice and condemned them for allowing capitalist cruelty and ignorance to cloud their responsibility as medical

Get Access