preview

Summary: The 2008 Financial Crisis

Better Essays

One of the first rules of parenting is do not reward bad behavior. For most parents, it is difficult, as regulating your child is no easy task, but most parents keep the long term objective of raising a well-behaved child in mind and often give the child an incentive to not act with bad behavior again. Most parents, or regulatory bodies, are able to figure this out. After all it is a simple notion, to incentivize good behavior and to punish bad behavior. During the 2008 financial crisis, however, when nearly every major bank on Wall Street did in fact act in bad behavior, the regulatory bodies or “parents” of Wall Street committed a cardinal sin and did not punish the firm’s bad behavior. The government essentially created a moral hazard …show more content…

Credit rating agencies were giving anything that came across their desk AAA ratings in order to not lose out on competition, real estate agents and mortgage brokers were giving houses and loans to people who couldn’t afford them, and the major banks who held long positions on the mortgage-backed securities were knowingly holding worthless bonds at the expense of the American people. It was the perfect storm for a financial crisis, as there was no one saying “no, we can’t be doing this.” The banks were colluding with rating agencies to rate their securities well until they exited their long position, the rating agencies were receiving good business from the banks, and the mortgage brokers and real estate agents were too ignorant to realize what was going on on the macro …show more content…

He wins 5 hands straight and starts buying himself and his friends playing with him at the table drinks after every win (only a percentage of his winnings), tips the dealer for dealing him good cards (again only a percentage of his winnings) and invests the rest back into the next hand of poker. He keeps playing and keeps winning and everyone is excited because he’s buying more drinks, he’s tipping more and frankly, it’s exciting to see a big gamble. But the poker player knows more than the general public. He knows that there’s only 8 decks of cards being shuffled and that the dealer is running out of cards to give him to win, and that eventually he’s going to lose that money. But he also doesn’t care because he knows that the rest of the casino goers are going to help him pay his debts when he finally loses, and that he won’t suffer any major repercussions from it. This is a morally hazardous situation, and essentially is exactly what happened in 2008. The poker player is the banker, the dealer is the credit rating agency, the other players at the tables are the executives, and the casino goers are the American taxpayer. The banker is satisfying his short term needs with bonuses (the drinks for him and his friends) and forming an amicable relationship with the card dealer (tipping him well) but knows eventually the curtain has to close and that he’ll be safe because the casino goers

Get Access