preview

Summary Of William Hazlitt's On The Pleasure Of Hatred

Decent Essays

Humanities Hatred The number of genocides committed in the history of the human race is inconceivable. In the Holocaust the minimum estimate of fatalities is five million, in the Holodomor Genocide the minimum was two million, in the Congo Genocide the minimum was three million, and this list could go on. Humanity has killed itself in massive numbers over and over again. Why, but for joy of the violence, of the death, and of the destruction? In “On the Pleasure of Hatred” William Hazlitt explores how humanity justifies these atrocities and what leads these atrocities to happen, which is in a word, hatred. Hazlitt claims that since humans inherently enjoy the act of hating, this causes them to hate themselves and create toxic societies. To …show more content…

Experiments have proven, time and time again, that humans will cause other humans intense pain, it has even been theorized that every baby is a true sociopath, and has to be taught how to feel by society. Hazlitt, similarly to said theory, believes that children are unnecessarily cruel, citing when “[they] kill flies for sport”. In evoking the image of children, who we consider the innocents in humankind, killing for the pleasure Hazlitt is stating that all humans are inherently cruel. The concept of inherent cruelty in humanity, promotes Hazlitt’s general argument that Humans enjoy hatred. To enumerate, the demonstration of fundamental human cruelty corresponds with Humanity's love for hatred because to be so unnecessarily cruel one must hate. Hazlitt goes on to use the sadistic nature of humanity to facilitate the other elements of his argument in his illustration of fire which “a whole town runs to present at… [but] by no means exults to see it extinguished”. In the sadistic act of enjoying watching others suffer great loss, inherent hatred is undoubtedly present. To feel antipathy so great that seeing others harmed is gratifying, takes a great effort and to do such without the conscious realization that such is happening - which is what Hazlitt argues - suggests a large underlying hatred for other Humans. Moreover, the toxicity intrinsic to the lack of willingness to aid in the end of the fire speaks to the larger toxicity of Human society. A society that doesn’t heal or help those in it which are suffering, but instead revels in it’s members suffering is rank with toxicity, becauses it harms its

Get Access