Heroines: The Lunch Ladies In November 2016, a student was hungry in a school cafeteria in Ohio. His name is Thomas, nine-years-old, who attended Jefferson Elementary School. The cafeteria workers regularly gave him a free meal since he seldom had money to pay for his lunch. He did not qualify for a free or reduced lunch program. Just before the cafeteria closed, and other students had exited the room, he checked out trays with leftover food, like half-eaten sandwiches, apples, crackers, and chips. Then he puts them in his backpack and ate them later when he was alone. He did not realize it, but the cafeteria ladies did much more than wear hair nets and scold children about eating their meals. They were heroines and self-sacrificing because …show more content…
In February 2017, Debbie Solsman, a lunch lady, was fired after she gave food away to students at Denver Place Elementary School in Ohio. She admitted feeding the students. She said, “I sometimes would buy (hungry students) an extra slice of pizza because I did feel them out, asking them what they had for supper the night before. Sometimes, they would tell me nothing” ( ). In a similar case, in December 2015, Darlene Bowen, another cafeteria worker at Irving Middle School, Idaho, was dismissed for giving away a free lunch to a 12-year-old student. Ms. Bowen was offered her job back. However, she was not sure that she wanted it, as she stated, “I have to think about it…This just breaks my heart, and I was in the wrong, but what do you do when the kids tell you that they’re hungry, and they don’t have any money?” ( ) Unfortunately, these cafeteria workers faced a systemic problem as to whether to ignore the students’ hunger or feed them, and they chose the latter in response to their sense of humanity. The lunch ladies’ concerns about the hungry students are based in a stark reality. The latest data collected from the states by the National Center for Education Statistics show …show more content…
Needy children may or may not eat breakfast, which is considered the most important meal of the day. Sometimes, these children have eaten more nutritiously with oatmeal, milk, and fruit, whereas others have eaten white-flour pancakes with syrup or sugar-laden cereal with milk, water, or nothing else. Even though egg whites, whole grain breads, fruits, and low-fat milk are better choices, they may not be available to them. Many families need education about nutrition and its effects on their children and families. By lunchtime, most poor children’s bodies are depleted and in need of another energy provider, even if they had a breakfast in the first place. School cafeterias may or may not have offered totally healthy lunch choices like soups, salads, fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains. Nevertheless, there are efforts to make positive changes, such as building gardens at schools. The cafeteria workers use the fruit and vegetables that were grown in the gardens in the lunches. Food service also offer a variety of fruits and salads as many options. Nutritional lunches should not be denied needy students because they cannot pay for them ( ). The lunch ladies are aware that needy students’ nutritional needs, like those of all students, should be a priority in their homes and in their
School lunch rooms have been evolving over the last decade. Healthier food choices and better-quality food are just two of many improvements happening inside school cafeterias. Although school lunch rooms are making various positive changes, there are still negative consequences for some students. Most students can go through the lunch line and not have to worry about the cost of the meal and whether they have enough money to buy a hot lunch. On the other hand, some students are constantly worrying about not being able to eat lunch due to the price. According to a CNN article titled “School Lunch Shaming” by Heather Long, “…an alarming number of American youngsters still can’t afford a $2.35 lunch, despite the dramatic expansion of free and reduced lunch programs” (paragraph 1), which demonstrates the struggles that these low-income families face when it comes to buying their student school lunches. Staff working in cafeterias have started to “shame” those students by taking away the student’s food and giving them a bag containing a cheese sandwich and milk to those students who are unable to afford their lunch. States such as New Mexico are taking a stand against school lunch shaming and have banned lunch shaming completely. Long also explained that, “The USDA is urging districts to stop “embarrassing” and “singling out” students who don’t have enough money for lunch” (paragraph 9), which further demonstrates the lengths people are going to solve the lunch shaming issues.
Sofia was embarrassed by the tacos. Her mom despatched her each day, and she tried to hide her tacos so nobody might see and laugh at her. In the future, another student saw her eating tacos and began calling her “Taco Head.” As a result, Sofia stopped consuming lunch to keep away from the teasing. Of instruction, Clark invited Sofia to devour lunch along with her.
In order to maximize our program’s ability to provide nutritious meals and snacks, we participate in the federal school nutrition programs, which includes the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. According to the Department of Agriculture, the National School Lunch Program is a federally assisted meal program for public and nonprofit private schools and residential child care institutions (2015). It provides nutritionally balanced, low-cost or free lunches to children each school day. On the same note, our program participates in School Breakfast Program. The department of Agriculture specifies that this program provides cash assistance to states to operate nonprofit breakfast programs in schools and residential childcare institutions. Both the National School Lunch Program, and the School Breakfast Program, ensures that the children receive the adequate nutrition while the our
This article by Great Schools is addressed to parents considered about the current school lunches provided to the children in their district. Unlike any other source, this one focuses solely on 3 organizations that advocate. The diversity of the listed projects gives an opportunity to expand on different approaches to solve the various problems of the lunch program. However, there is no attempt to address the current issues of our system, requiring a previous understanding of how the school lunch system currently operates.
For many previous years, Anaheim High school has had a couple lunch system changes finally settling on two lunches, both being half an hour long. With both lunches only being half an hour long, for certain, more than one thousand students being in each, imagine the lunch lines! Making line to get your lunch takes already about fifteen minutes, half of a person’s time already, which leaves little time for a student to enjoy their so called meal and free time with friends.Based on other student’s experiences dealing with school lunch, one can rightfully assume that high schoolers would much rather hold in their hunger until after school rather than have the food being provided. There is not a single day that goes by in which a high schooler does not complain about the “worst than jail” food being served to them. This proposal will go into detail about why having an hour off-campus lunch can increase healthier eating habits between the undergraduates of Anahiem High School. In this layout, you will read about the issue of why we believe off- campus lunch would be a healthier choice for Anaheim High school students, you will also encounter our plan of how we intend to carry out this idea, what exactly needs to be done, with the help of who, and so on.
Since the implementation of the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010, many school nutrition programs have had challenges in meeting the new standards. Several districts across the nation have indicated a decline in lunch meal participation and financial viability as a result. However, during this time, SLA Management experienced the majority of its growth in the number of schools under contract and, more importantly, the number of meals served. Our meals have always been both tasty and nutritious. Fact is, kids love them!
Most people in the United States today are unaware of the increasing numbers of child hunger throughout the country. Today, a staggering one in five kids struggle with hunger in our own country (Francisco 18). Not only does it affect their concentration and grades in school, but also their overall health. Over 1.02 billion people in the world are considered to be malnourished, and hunger and malnutrition is the leading cause of child deaths, which accounts for 6 million children each year (Nah and Chau). When most people think of children and families going hungry, they think that it is just a problem in other countries. However, there is an increasing amount of children and their families in North Carolina
The lunches served in Frederick County Schools, and Urbana High School in particular lack nutritional value and are unappetizing. When interviewing Casey Ballow (a student who buys lunch everyday) about whether the school lunches are nutrional she said “The majority of students walk out [of the lunch line] without the most nutritional part of their lunch”. FCPS has made snacks whole grain, which usually makes them less tasty. Packing a lunch is a hassle because it is both time consuming and expensive, not to mention you cannot bring any warm foods. When asked why Casey chooses to buy a lunch, despite getting “soggy chicken patties and burnt french fries” she said “Buying a lunch saves me time in morning”. There is not a wide enough selection of lunch foods for students.
The Delicious Food We Eat A Satire on the Food Provided By the Federal School Food Program One of many students’ favorite times of the typical school day is lunch time. Students have the chance to get out of the routine of class and relax for a while, eat lunch, and socialize. They are able to enjoy a delicious meal sometimes on campus, and sometimes off campus. The majority of people stay in house and choose to eat the food provided for them by the school.
High school food options raise problems for students. School lunches may not be the cheapest option for the students or the district. According to "Duluth high school principals want to stick with open campuses," Duluth’s principal, Tonya Sconiers, opposes a closed campus because of the financial burden. This program change would cost the school approximately $239,000 to supply what would be needed for the new food policy. In addition, the lunches provided by the school lack quality. Students report the food as bland, and portion size is not enough to fuel for the entire school day. Numerous students involved in after-school activities cannot perform their best without a sufficient amount food in their stomachs. The food should provide energy for the students throughout the day. For low-income students, this lunch might be the only reliable daily meal.
In numerous incidences around the country schools have reportedly denied their students school lunches because their lunch accounts are overdrawn in some cases by only a couple dollars (Green). Also, traditional packed lunches are under fire, in part, because some administrators who feel that the lunches are not nutritious enough for students have banned them (Eng, Hood). Because some school children are going hungry and have no other means of obtaining a meal during the school day, the school lunch program needs to take additional measures to ensure that the needs of all US students are being met.
As they walked down the hallway leading to the wide double doors they noticed they were closed, with a small white paper on the door. Struggling to read it, they asked a nearby teacher for help. As she read out the sign the little kids began to yell in disagreement, and mourn over the words. The sign read, “Due to the Incident on November 14, Cheeze-its are no longer allowed in the cafeteria! Thank you for your
People live in a complex world where things are never as simple as they seem. Officials agree that in order for students to perform well in school, their basic needs have to be met (in conjunction with the ideas of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs). While schools may not be able to provide a safe place to sleep or warm clothing during the winter, they can provide a healthy, nutritious meal. According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, the number of children under 18 years of age living below the federal poverty level of $23,550 for a family of four represent 21.1% of the population (“Child Poverty,” n.d.). The National Lunch Act and its subsequent revisions have sought to mitigate the effects of hunger. Unfortunately, there are other circumstances that affect the desired outcomes of serving a balanced meal to students in need.
School lunches are often unsung heroes of many modern American households. Frequently overlooked and disregarded because of their stigma, school lunches are a key ingredient that may help make the world a better place. Unknowingly, great numbers of individuals in our communities deal with food insecurities every day of their lives. It baffles me that in an advanced society many people do not have the resources to provide food for themselves or their families. Until it affected me personally, I was unaware nor passionate about the struggles of food insecurity. My passion for solving food insecurity in my local community has led me to gain both experience and leadership through understanding and advocating for those around me.
Every day, millions of school children around the world take advantage of school lunch programs. Depending on the financial situation of their families, some of these students may qualify to get these lunches for free. For the poorest children, this may be the only meal they get all day. For the rest of the children who are not living in poverty, these program allow them to purchase a hot meal during school at a very low price. While these school lunch programs help out countless students in many countries around the world, there are numerous problems associated with them. Often, standards for food preparation are not high enough. In countries like America, these lunches commonly lack the proper nutrition children need. Instead,