Throughout Dwayne Lowery’s life he encountered quite a few Literary Sponsors, as we all have. “Any agent, local or distant, concrete or abstract, who enable, support, teach, model, as well as recruit, regulate, suppress, or withhold literacy”, is Brandt’s definition of such in her essay Sponsors of Literacy published 1998. From home to school, competition to co-workers, sponsors may take form in many ways
From a young age, Lowery was influenced and subconsciously guided to think like a Union worker. His father’s views were openly discussed in the household, as most houses do; and as Lowery was of such a young age he thought of these views as a general truth, even though he didn’t care much about them at the time. As a union member, his father supported the left wing liberals, constantly reading about them in the paper. This political background made for Lowery’s ties to the union as well as his sympathy for the workers and motivation to do well in this field. Everyone should know, you cannot help very much if you always lose the case.
…show more content…
The Union sent him to a number of workshops which helped him improve his literacy in ways which he could do more good for the group. Union training “organized and administered stratified systems of opportunity and access”(Brandt 166) to new knowledge, also known as the workshops. With the knowledge gained in these workshops, Lowery was able to “present the union side” while “slicing chunks off the employer’s case”(175) to make for the perfect
In the essay ‘What is literacy?’, James Paul Gee, presents to us a very detailed examination, of concepts that are rather deemed to be similar by most. He explores the definition and meaning of “literacy” by taking into account other related ideas such as “learning”, “discourse” and “acquisition”.
In his writing “The New Literacy” Thompson uses Andrea Lunsford, a professor of writing and rhetoric and her project
One way that literacy sponsors were interpreted in activities in class was when we had the Socratic seminar. We were acting as literacy sponsors for each other by expressing our feelings and thoughts freely and respectfully. It taught us how to have a debate orderly. I also interpreted the Ted Talk video has a literacy sponsor. He shared his experiments contrary to the world's beliefs about learning and language. He even argued his own point to prove his initial point. That video acted as a literacy sponsor by allowing me to see someone continue to build on an idea, act on it, and believe in
Professor Deborah Brandt’s research article “Sponsors of Literacy” is about the importance of the sponsors. According to her, sponsors are the ones that provide the sponsored the access to literacy. Brandt interviews about 100 people and through those interviews, Brandt makes three main points regarding sponsors. The first one is about how different kinds of sponsors can produce different kinds of performances. The example that Brandt shows to the readers is the difference in the background of Raymond Branch and Dora Lopez. Branch is able to be exposed to the more powerful sponsors, while Lopez cannot. The second main point in this article is that economic and political can cause a rise in literacy
The article called “Literacy: A Lineage” by Melanie Luken and she wrote about her experience of her love for reading and writing. She became interesting to reading and writing because of her dad who one, which inspired and encouraged her to became interesting to reading and writing. She enjoyed writing the poems about her dad and her that they went to riding the bikes. She has developed her ability to understand her literacy of reading and writing because her father taught her. Her quote, “In the same way, my passion for reading and writing developed in me through the influence of my father who has a deep love of literature himself” (Luken 133). That is meaning father loves literacy so he taught
In “Sponsors of Literacy,” author Deborah Brandt attempts to explain literacy, its history, and how there are influences that form the way we learn and practice literacy. Brandt argues that the forces that influence an individual’s literacy are sponsors of literacy. Some “forces” that Brandt discusses are influential people, such as parents, siblings, teachers, and mentors. Other forces can include culture, race, gender, language and location, access to technology, and politics. Brandt described several events in our history to help define what exactly a sponsor of literacy is. She spent several years interviewing people from all walks of life to find their unique literacy history and used them as examples in her writing. Varying ages, backgrounds, and sponsors indicate that literacy changes with each generation and is viewed as a valued commodity.
In Deborah Brandt’s essay “Sponsors of Literacy,” Brandt describes the process of how people become literate, the effect of their experiences, and influential people on their learning. The term that Brandt uses frequently to describe those who have a profound influence on a child’s learning is “literacy sponsor.” She defines literacy sponsors as, “Agents, local or distant, concrete, or abstract, who enable, support, teach, model, as well as recruit, regulate, suppress, or withhold literacy—and gain advantage by it in some way,” (Wardle 46). Essentially, Brandt is saying that every literate person has had the support of a person or idea that inspires their desire to read and write. The concept of sponsorship can be applied to fields outside of reading and writing too. There are sponsors of science, sponsors of art, and sponsors of medicine. Similarly, these sponsor help students learn to understand the principles of their individual fields. This paper focuses on the sponsorship of first-year and second-year University of Minnesota Medical School students from the Nu Sigma Nu fraternity. Data was collected through interviews with four students from this fraternity. The guiding question for this research paper was, “Can Brandt’s definition of literacy sponsor be applied to other fields of learning, such as the medical field.” If it is found that the definition for sponsorship can be applied to the medical field, then sponsorship can be applied to other
Nevertheless, workers’ complaints went beyond low wages, as they became increasingly upset at how much autonomy and control over the working process they had lost. This disappointed those who had previously took pride in their work, as well as those who had previously controlled their own working conditions. As a result of these new happenings, workers began forming and joining unions, or labor organizations, in hopes of advancing their cause through collective bargaining, and, if absolutely necessary,
According to Brandt, a unionism’s history was used as a path to closely observe the literacy sponsor of Lowery.
Henry Ward Beecher, a member of the middle class, regarded the labor union strikes as irrational acts. He described them as “transient bubbles, which burst as soon as they were formed. They sprang from ignorance and passion.” He degraded strikers to nothing more than desperate souls that could not provide for themselves or their families. Beecher, along with most the middle class, spoke in an apathetic tone
The idea of Sponsors of Literacy was originally proposed by Deborah Brandt in her 1998 article, “Sponsors of Literacy.” In her article, she argued that Sponsors of Literacy include people, institutions, and circumstances; they vary based on the person’s experiences and surroundings. Sponsors of literacy are essential in everyone’s life due to the powerful role they demonstrate on the long run. In my own reading and writing experience, my sponsors of literacy were my childhood memories, my school, and the various resources I’ve used to accomplish an outstanding Multi-Genre Research Paper.
As I got older, the knowledge that my father negotiated with his very own employers in order to ensure that his coworkers would also reap the benefits the entire union fought for affected me on personal a level; to know that the man who drove me to school and bought for me school supplies each year also carried a responsibility to his co-workers made me rather proud. However, despite the fact that I grew up the daughter of a Union Steward, I also grew up as a teenager in today’s society: one that no longer suffers from such rampant corruption that induced misfortunes such as illegal instances of child labor: a calamity also solved by a committee aiming to better working standards. My view of labor has always been through rose-tinted glasses thanks to modern times; I really only knew of the exploits that my father had experienced from what he told me, forms recounting various union related news lying in heaps on the dinner table, and snippets on the news or the lightly-touched upon topics in my Consumer’s Education
Literacy plays a huge role in my daily life. Every single day I read and write. Whether it’s writing an email or reading a text message, class assignment, discussion board, etc. My literacy journey is unique because I have had different experiences. As a result, this is how my literacy journey has let me to be the reader that I am.
In Francine Prose’ paper, “I know Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read”, Prose describes why many high school student dislike reading literature that the American education system has preached. The premise of her essay is that today’s high school English classes are largely flawed in both material and teaching method. Prose contends that these practices are damaging to the students’ understanding and appreciation of literature. She harshly critiques the quality of required reading in American high schools and suggests a reconsideration of the English curriculum. She challenges the audience to acknowledge the curriculum’s impact on high school students and urges the audience to consider how it may addressed. Prose crafts her argument by using an appeal to logos, asking rhetorical questions and employing negative connotation.
In comparison, it seemed as though those who were not part of a union really got taken for granted. He told us a story of two sister who work for the same company just different titles. One was part of the union and the other was not. The one who was part of the union only paid $73 a month out of the $600 health insurance plan, while the company paid the remaining balance. The sister who was not part of the union with the same insurance plan had to pay $255 a month. Both of the sisters worked full time at this place, but the difference was, the sister who was not part of the union had to get a second part time job just to afford insurance. In my head this story was crazy. How could companies do this to their employees, but I soon realized that those who make these decisions only care about making money. He mentioned that the CEO of this specific business these sisters worked for made a total of approximately 32 million dollars last year. Thirty-two million! While the CEO is making this money, many of his employees are struggling to pay for the benefits they receive through the job. This is a reason for the