Driving to the Funeral was written by the Pulitzer Prize winner, Anna Quindlen. Anna Quindlen addressed the topics of the current problem of teenage auto accidents in the United States, the question of appropriate ages to be licensed, and other “fixes” for teenage automobile related deaths. In this passage the author is trying to persuade parents of teenagers and the states to raise the legal driving age to lower the teenage driving accident and death count. The authors single most important idea of the passage is to persuade parents and the states to raise the legal driving age of sixteen. She uses statics and collective experience to show that raising the driving age will help lower death rates. The tone the author conveyed writing this
In the article “Driving to the Funeral” the author Anna Quindlen addresses the issue of the age to begin driving. She believes that the age 16 is far too young teenagers to begin driving. Driving at a too young of an age is one big reason that the way majority of teenagers die is because of automobile accidents. There isn’t enough limitations on young drivers, causing safety concerns. Parents shouldn’t allow their children to drive at such a young age, just because they want their kids to have “freedom and responsibility”.
In the article Driving to the Funeral the author Anna Quindlen talks about teens that are between the ages of 15-20 are the ones who are most likely to get in car crashes before graduating high school. Quindlen uses pathos, logos and ethos to inform parents with children for a higher driving age.
The short story “Driving to the Funeral” by Anna Quindlen discusses about the appropriate age to start driving. The author starts out by stating that “car crashes are the No. 1 cause of death among 15 to 20-year-olds in this country.” Many teenagers start driving at 16 and that is the reason why the number of car crashes continue to go up for their age group. Quindlen questions why parents of 16-year-olds allow their kids to start driving right away without giving it much thought. Their recklessness only leads to missing countless high school memories that last a lifetime. Teenagers who start driving early are known to break protocols, which is one of the reasons of fatal car crashes. One protocol is that they are not allowed to carry more
“Driving to the Funeral” is an article about adolescent teens getting killed behind the wheel in the United States. Quindlen states that car crashes are the number one cause of death among 15-20 year olds. Quindlen also believes that the legal driving age in the U.S. should be raised to 18. Quindlen uses imagery, logos and pathos to inform parents, and encourage them to reconsider allowing their children to get behind the wheel at 16.
A lobby that speaks out against teen driving is Mothers against driving, who say that drinking and driving is the easiest ways that teenage driving accidents can occur. “Given the incidence of auto-accident deaths among teenagers, despite the higher drinking age, you have to ask whether the powerful lobby Mothers Against Drunk Driving simply targeted the wrong D.” This quote demonstrates an ethos because it is given from an incredibly large and reliable count, a lobby group opposing drinking and driving underage. Their reliability makes us comfortable believing the information and its accountability. Anna Quindlen can also be believed to be a reliable source. “The national highway traffic safety administration has found that neophyte drivers of 17 have about a third as many accidents as their counterparts only a year younger.” Quindlen collects facts from people who have studied this subject to reinforce her beliefs on changing the driving age. He retrieves factual information on the subject from people who have researched it. This gives us a credible first hand facts so we can get in depth and accurate information on the
I’ve recently discovered that the leading deaths for 16-19 years old are car crashes. In the United State of America, ages between 16-19 there were 2,333 were killed. That’s not all, 221,313 were treated in emergency hospitals. You have to consider to processing this in your mind, that some of those crashes were not the 16-19 drivers fault. Sixteen year olds that drive may not be the cause of all accidents. We must all be responsible drivers, no matter the age.
Fatal car crashes have been an issue since the introduction of the automobile. Thankfully, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in an article published March 21, 2017, “The percentage of teens in high school who drink and drive by more than half since 1991” This is in part due to the MLDA Act that has restricted many new drivers from getting drunk and recklessly driving through towns. In that same article the CDC also claims, “Young drivers (ages16-20) are 17 times more likely to die in a crash when they have a blood alcohol concentration of .08% than when they have not been drinking.” Any change to the Act to lower the drinking age will only more likelihood to a fatal crash within that age group. At the Roanoke College, a private and liberal arts institute in Maryland, students complied a paper assignment with statistics of fatal car crashes due to drunk driving below the minimum drinking age. “…for the 19- and 20-year-old age cohort, after implementation of the age law, there was a startlingly and statistically significant decline (to the 4% level) in the number of driver deaths in single-vehicle nighttime accidents...” While adults and older teens would claim they could still drive sober and drink below the age of 21, the statistics show otherwise. No one can, in good thinking, lower
In the article titled "States Should Raise Driving Age" discusses why states should raise the driver's license age from 16 to 17 or even 18 years old. The author proves that research has shown that New Jersey has significantly reduced deaths related to traffic crashes in teen drivers compared to states that issue a license at 16 years old. New Jersey issues a drivers license at 17 years old. The author states that representatives of the Insurance Institute agree that there are other options such as tougher laws, education programs, and longer permit requirements that would allow teens to still obtain a license at the age of 16. Although there is evidence that teen driver crash's are high, researchers argue that auto safety groups should focus
It is highly dangerous for people to drink and the drive especially for teenagers because they are newer drivers. It is terrifying to think that forty percent of alcohol-related fatal car accidents involve teenagers; teenage drunk driving also kills eight other teenagers every day. Thousands of people believe that “... you should know that these tragic events can happen - to anyone, but especially teenagers because of how little alcohol it takes to mess up your judgment” (Dolmetsch and Mauricette 32). These authors are correct, except drinking and driving affects the entire population, not just people under the age of twenty-one. Plus, car accidents are the highest among new drivers, regardless of the drinking age. Many people argue that raising the drinking age to twenty-one directly correlates with the lower number of car accidents and fatalities; however, studies prove otherwise. There was a decline in drunk driving fatalities two years before the Uniform Drinking Age Act passed in 1982, meaning that the drunk driving fatalities were not decreased by the age being at twenty-one. The trends in alcohol consumption and driving solely relies on the generation and how much they decide to
According to the article "States Urged to Raise the Driving Age." approximately 5,000 teenagers die each year in car crashes; however, not all of the 5,000 deaths are the fault of teenage drivers, other drivers- who could be adults- can create accidents which lead to the death of teenagers, which proves that anybody can create a vehicle accident. Several states have already raised the driving age from 16 to 18. Raising the driving age will only create bad drivers at 18 instead of 16. The states that have raised the driving age believe that the number of teenage fatalities will be reduced as 16 year olds would not be permitted to obtain a driver license until they reach the age of 18. After all, every driver on the road was inexperienced, as well as, accident prone at one time or another. Therefore, the driving age should not be raised as every driver must become experienced.
There has been a big discussion in the past few years about the set driving age. This problem has started to become a real issue. It has come to a point where the state legislator is thinking about changing the driving age. Many young teens are trying to fight this law from being passed. The driving age should not be raised because, some teens can’t rely on their parents for rides, students have to drive to work, and some parents need help getting things done.
Most states have developed a graduated licensing program which has proven to be successful it helps the young teens the importance of driving safely. Why is it important learning to drive is the first step of stepping into adulthood. (B) Instead of raising the driving age we should continue to implement programs which slowly gives more driving privileges to prove they’re safe trustworthy drivers. (C) It’s also been proven that zero tolerance cell phone use and driving curfew laws have also proven to be successful. If young teens are the ultimate cause of car accidents how come there are recent studies that say elderly drivers are the ultimate #1 cause of car accidents involving fatalities?.If teens have no how’re they going to get to there work on time also how’re they going to get to school on time to get there education and are not eligible to receive special busing privileges?. Teens should be eligible to receive their license so they can get to wherever they’re going on time.Also young teen drivers have to understand how dangerous driving can be and not only do they make it that way it’s the other drivers they have watch out for,Basically they have to watch thereself and the other
Nowadays, the legal driving age in America is sixteen years old. However, more and more traffic accidents occur. This led to a debate about whether the driving age should be raised to twenty-one or not is an ongoing matter. There are two sides argued on this issue with their own arguments. In my opinion, raising the legal driving age to twenty-one will bring many positive aspects to society such as decreasing the accident rates, reduce the traffic jam and prevent obesity in young people.
An average 15 year old teenage girl sits outside the school in the chilly, winter wind. She is waiting for her father to arrive to take her home. She couldn't wait to turn 16. Nothing sounded better than ditching the frozen bench for a plush car seat. She dreamed about being able to do so many more extra curricular activities, not having to worry about her parents schedule. She could help out around the house, and go have fun with her friends. She just couldn't wait, but what would happen if the legal driving age was changed to 18? Would all of her dreams about turning 16 be shattered? This paper is about the effects of changing the legal age of driving to 18.
Vehicle accidents are something that cause young lives to be lost frequently, raising the driving age from 16 to 18 could lower fatalities.