Summary: NCAA Athletes Should Be Paid

Griffin, Geoff,  Should College Athletes Be Paid? Greenhaven Press. Farmington Hills, MI:    2008. Charles H. Hammer, Walter Byers. Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Exploiting College Athletes.

On Tuesday, March 8th, I attended the book signing for Indentured: The Inside Story of the Rebellion Against the NCAA. The author of the book, Joe Nocera, started by reading a section of the book about Ryan Boatright and the NCAA struggles he dealt with. Next, the audience was able to ask questions. The majority of the discussion was about whether college athletes should be paid or not. Joe Nocera thinks college athletes should be paid because he thinks that being a college athlete is a full time job. He also believes that college athletes should take two courses each semester and be granted a lifetime scholarship. He thinks they deserve to have an education that will last for the rest of their lives. The questions about college athletes

The NCAA or the National Collegiate Athletic Association in its 2014 total fiscal revenue collection data racked up a whopping $989 million dollars, nearly reaching a billion dollars according to USA Today Sports in article done by Steve Berkowitz. The biggest revenue earners in NCAA sports are men’s college football and basketball, with those two sports alone making $166 million alone. In addition to that $166 million, the television revenues from viewers, ticket sales, and merchandise purchases add another surplus of hundreds of millions of dollars unaccounted for. At times going respectfully to the university as their profit, where for example a standalone college like Texas A&M in the year 2014-2015 generated a total revenue of $192 million itself, which factored in ticket sales, rights/licensing to the team’s name, contributions, and other sources of revenue, according to USA

With debate on whether or not to compensate the college athletes in monetary terms due to the students’ sports talents help their various colleges to receive awards both rewards and cash money, it is important to look at criticisms of the National Collegiate Athletic Association with regards to the association’s advertisement deals of approximately more than a billion shillings profits yet no athlete is being compensated for his or her hard work. That according to Zimbalist (2013) is because the critiques are using the very developments to argue in favour of the payment of the student athletes since the opportunity for education and exposure to earn a professional contract is enough compensation since the cost of paying the student athletes would be too high.

Do you think that NCAA players should get paid for playing their sports. NCAA players should be able to get paid for playing in games that generate millions of dollars for universities, they can get seriously injured playing the game, their images are used for other people to make money, and they are not able to get a job because of all the hours put into their sport.

Division 1 schools have generated a total of $9.15 billion in revenue during the 2015 fiscal year. (2) That's a lot of money for students to make. College athletes will go straight from highschool to going to another 4 -12 years of college. They are using their adulthood to do more school. Not start a family, or get money for their family. Should the NCAA pay them a small cut of it? If student-athletes make all of this money for the league, they should at least get a piece of what they have made for them. Could we possibly be seeing college players make more money than the average adult? Sometimes players have injuries. Who would pay for that? Would the school or league pay for it?

College athletes are the face of the NCAA, without them it would be nothing. Even though they are the ones who keep it running, they are given no money. It is a corrupt system that takes advantage of its athletes. The athletes bring in millions of dollars to their schools, scholarships do not cover the full cost of attending school, they are forced to go to college before the pros, and the athletes work more on their sport each week, than the average american works on their job, yet they receive none of the revenue.

Imagine yourself watching College Football on a Saturday afternoon, but then you realize that most of these players won’t even get to play in the NFL. NFL players get paid millions of dollars a year while college athletes don’t get paid at all. Every college athlete dreams of playing at a professional level at their sport. Less than 2% of college athletes get to play professionally. College athletes train for an average of 45 hours a week, which is 5 hours each day. Some of them are offered a scholarship to college, but they get nothing after that. Sometimes players are supposed to play professionally, therefore, spend all of their time training and get injured. This would most likely lead to professional sports teams not wanting to pick him or her because of the injury. Even those who do play professionally may not have the best financial management skills

As I leave with a quote, the NCAA should really take my topic into consideration, realize that some of the athletes could really use the money that the colleges are making off of them. Other observers note that the status quo, in which the NCAA claims to be an amateur organization but reaps large financial rewards, cannot continue; the organization, they say, will eventually either have to become entirely professional—which would include paying athletes—or have to end its corporate partnerships. Former NCAA football player Sack writes, "In past decades, the NCAA substituted a counterfeit version of amateurism for the real thing.… As college sports moves into the second decade of the new millennium, athletes will undoubtedly organize to demand

The argument of whether or not the NCAA should pay its athletes has been debated for around 8 years now, and right when it seems like there may be a breakthrough another reason comes up for the issue to be put on hold. College athletic programs are multimillion dollar programs and the athletes who make this revenue possible are getting the bare minimum to make it by in these college programs. Last year the Texas A&M athletic program was at the top of the NCAA revenue list bringing in $192,608,876. A third of that revenue comes from ticket sales alone, which leaves the rest to television rights, licensing and other donations. In the NCAA there are 26 colleges which are bringing in over 100 million dollars in NCAA revenue (USA Today 1). But still, Horace claims that “there is a misconception that athletic programs in general are profitable and are making hand-over fist. While truly most operate at a cost to the institution”.

Colleges give athletes the opportunity to play sports at the highest level possible while making a constant progress towards a degree. According to the statistics, these colleges earn a huge amount of money from letting these athletes perform. As an example the NCAA and CBS/Turner sports had a $10.8 million deal for televising march madness during 2011-2014. The enormous amount of money received by the NCAA have turned into the controversy if athletes should be rewarded with money, or with a full-time scholarship during a period of 4 years. My proposal is to not pay college players, because even though they spend a ton of time working hard to perform well, and they miss college classes; an average college player in division I receive a full-time

For years now there has been the argument if college athletes should be paid to play or not. It is an ongoing debate among many people, including the National Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA), athletes, coaches, and other various people. The has debate has gone far enough that a lawsuit has started over it. There are many arguments for college athletes being paid, such as; the athletes do not have time to work, their images are being used without any type of pay, and how the NCAA and coaches make millions of dollars off of the players while the players do not make anything. On the flip side of this, arguments that the athletes should not be paid include; they get paid in other varies ways, the average college athletic department loses

Division 1 sports have increased monstrously among Americans in the course of recent decades. Division 1 college athletes should be paid because players are giving up their bodies for their school, it will keep more players in school, and to ensure an equal distribution of the revenue that the players bring to the school. This has expanded incomes for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating universities which has fueled the level headed discussion of whether school competitors ought to be paid past their athletic grants. In the course of recent decades, Division 1 sports have increased tremendously in the United States. Regardless of whether it be football, basketball, or hockey, etc. as far back as the start of the century, college athletics have gotten an overflow of income to their separate universities, and additionally enhancing the college's notoriety. For instance, in a review led by the Orlando Sentinel, it was evaluated that the University of Texas' Athletic Program had the most astounding income of some other University at

Be that as it may, once the season began up, he couldn't work that employment any longer. We were out and about constantly, even gone for two straight weeks at a certain point. The educators let us do our work from the street, yet the occupation wasn't going to pay you since you were playing ball on a street trip. The group gave us supper cash (about $7 per feast) so we could get chips and fixings with our sandwiches, yet whatever else was viewed as a NCAA infringement.

There has always been a big controversial debate on whether college athletes should receive some type of compensation for playing Division one sports. Many college teams pile up huge revenue from football games, basketball games, and many other different sports. Although the university piles up huge amounts of that money, not one penny goes towards any of the athletes. Even though they’re the reason why universities are getting rich from all the money the sports have obtained, the revenue that usually comes from game tickets, sponsorships, and booster clubs. Also college athletics have a huge popularity among Americans over the past few years, more American have turned their heads to watching collegiate sports rather than watching professional sports, to the fact that its way more exciting. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the other colleges that’s participating with this, in this case the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Student athletes have worked hard, have dedicated themselves to the sport and also sacrificed their own time for the sport they love.