preview

Subtext In The Crucible

Good Essays

Drama often generates levels of meaning that are not directly stated (sometimes called sub-text). Explore some examples of the presence of sub-text and its dramatic importance in at least two of the plays you have studied. (May 2014) The presence of subtext is the hidden unspoken intention behind a character’s words and actions. It is the playwright’s intention for a play. Much can be gathered from the implications shown throughout a play, including reflections of any socio-political or cultural concerns the dramatist has. The dramatic importance of subtext is reinforced through thematic elements, and the use of symbolism shown through contrasting characters. This essay will explore these techniques, providing specific examples through a …show more content…

Williams and Miller both have within their respective plays, insinuated with the presence of subtext something larger than their plays. Williams’s play is a tragedy, and one of quietude. He once expressed that “Glass Menagerie is my first quiet play, and perhaps my last.” It is a play of profound sadness, and through relationships between characters, portrays the “cries of the heart.” There is no cry more powerful that the cry and inner desperation of the heart. Williams’s has very little social context, but rather focuses on the conflicts within a domestic family. Such a focus is powerful, and the playwright expresses this power and importance implicitly through the estranged relationship between Amanda and Tom Wingfield. Amanda and Tom share a familial relationship of mother and son. Williams depicts Amanda at first interpretation as overbearing, hypercritical and controlling. However, on further assessment, the audience is able to acknowledge a more admirable facet to her character: her evident persistence in trying to love her children. Through her attempts in perpetuating her youth and past glory, she distorts reality to fit her …show more content…

The presence of subtext indicates a real socio-historical event. Throughout the 1940s and 1950’s America was overwhelmed with concerns about the threat of communism growing in Eastern Europe and China. Capitalizing on those concerns, a Senator named Joseph McCarthy made a public accusation that more than two hundred communists had infiltrated the United States government. McCarthy’s accusations heightened the political tensions of the times and although eventually proved untrue, the paranoid hunt for infiltrators is echoed throughout the play. The play resonated the political ideological idea and regime of viewing people with independent ideas with suspicion and as a threat. These people were hunt down, put on trial, prosecuted and possibly killed. Miller uses the characters of Proctor and Danforth to symbolizes an individual’s conflict against authority. Danforth is portrayed as the spokesperson for the institution and prides himself on being the ultimate authority in the court. When he voices, “A person is either with this court or he must be counted against it” he is an indicating that someone either wholeheartedly agrees with his judgments or is against him, and therefore, an enemy of the court. Although Danforth most probably does want to defend and uphold the law, he is also selfish. All throughout the play, he comes across as a character with integrity that

Get Access