Steven Soderbergh’s “Erin Brockovich” is an autobiography of Brockovich and her involvement in the largest monetary direct-case action lawsuit within the United States. Despite a lack of formal education and law experience, Brockovich proves to be the key element to winning a plaintiff case against multi-billion-dollar industry, Pacific Gas and Energy Company (PG&E).
Often, law is recognized as a tool that ultimately provides justice; however, it also holds the power to silence others. In this film, PG&E ultimately have a greater voice than the plaintiffs despite the mass effect of the actions of the company. The plaintiffs reside in the quaint Californian community of Hinkley where it is discovered that PG&E are responsible for great amounts of industrial groundwater contamination. Accordingly, Michael Asimow and Shannon Mader link Erin Brockovich with the likes of “Class Action” and “A Civil Action” citing that the three films depict the recurring theme of “anti-business slant” .
As Edward Masry states in the film, “PG&E figures, we'll let the cat out of the bag, tell the people the water's not
…show more content…
Essentially, this states that the outlaw is predominantly portrayed as a white male due to the fact there are not any criminal stereotypes which inhibit their heroism. To illustrate, outlaws are unlikely to recognize with an ethnic minority as racial profiling and prejudice exist within the legal system. Moreover, the University of Illinois uses the “James Brothers” as a relevant example of an outlaw). It states that women cannot fight the sexism within law without the risk of being recognized as a “deviant woman”. Additionally, this behaviour allows men to enhance their masculinity whilst it reduces the feminine manner of women and downgrading their societal worth; thus, altering one’s image of an
In the movie “The Civil Action” Jan is a lawyer at a law firm which uses Ethical Relativism in most of the movie because they think that the more money they get for their clients, the happier they will become or just because they get a large settlement, it’s going to solve their clients problems. After seeing the a contaminated water and the damage done to the families he was representing, Jan thought he was going to strike gold and win a massive amount of money from the company he was going against. The families didn’t care about the money because they all lost something to the polluted water the factory was giving off, and all they wanted was an apology and and for the company to clean up the place so no more children would die. Progressing
Pezzullo investigates in this article the strategies of environmental justice advocates in Warren County, North Carolina. The rhetorical efforts shown by these advocates vigorously urged the state of North Carolina to clean up a local toxic landfill caused by a truck illegally dumping oil contaminated with PCBs in the middle of the night.
This could apply to Enbridge through their choice to engage with Native American advocates but weakening the arguments by maintaining control over the medium and format of that engagement. While this isn’t an equitable strategy, nor one that would solve the controversy, it elucidates the problem for Enbridge on both sides. By refusing to engage with dissent, Enbridge weakens their own argument for the pipeline while strengthening the unity and potency of the opposition’s arguments. Finally, Phaedra Pezzulo examines how Native American advocates and environmental justice advocates alike subvert existing power structures to assert their arguments. In reference to the emergence of the Environmental Justice Movement within Warren County, NC, Pezzulo cites the theory of critical interruptions. Essentially, through the case study of corporations discarding toxic waste in a low-income mostly black community, this article observes the importance of narratives within environmental discourse. Pezzulo identifies the importance of narratives constructed by either the Environmental Justice movement as a whole or of the state
While both the “Invisible Man” and “The House of Mirth” were written near the same time frame, they were written in differing perspectives, reflecting not only social classes but also gender roles of the time period. At the time these books were written, men and women had very different roles in society. Women were in the midst of a long arduous battle of the women suffrage movement and as they gained ground in this fight the gender roles started to change along with the country: “Westward expansion also demanded that many women step outside prescribed gender roles and perform “men’s” work on the frontier” (Jolliffe 1). Men, on the other hand, had a battle of their own trying to defend their masculinity during the movement of women into new social ranks, “masculinity in the United States is certain only in its uncertainty; its stability and sense of well-being depend on a frantic drive to control its environment.” (Stryffeler 4) The struggles of this dynamic time period are expressed through the eyes of these two authors giving readers an idea of how women were viewed differently from men surrounding the gender and social issues that dominated history.
It is no coincidence that the movies Nicole Rafter dives into have one of the three principles attached to the reasoning of the deviant behaviors in crime films. For example in this movie corporate America is deemed to be the top dog within this small rural community. Erin Brockovich the main character is investigating a case of negligence of Pacific Gas and Electric Company and their knowledge of carcinogenic hexavalent chromium contaminating the water of this community. As Erin is portrayed to be this irresponsible broke mother who can’t hold a job she finds this opportunity to be huge as she can potentially hold a job within this law firm. As emotions get attached listening to the illnesses of the families within the Hinkley community she finds it rewarding that she’s contributing to the potential settlement these families need in order to regain their health.
(Smith) Women were not seen as threats to men because if they were to show any sign of un-obedience towards their significant other, they would be charged or brought to justice by death. Female shaping was an issue in which females were formed and based upon their “bad deeds.” (Smith) There was a great emphasis that was forced upon women.
In the movie A Civil Action, families of a town who lost their children due cancer caused by two companies that were dumping toxic waste into a water stream. They contacted a local attorney to try and bring these companies to justice. The companies were trying to pay the attorneys to just drop the case but they didn't give in. In the end of the movie they pretty much lost the case but the EPA found out about it and came in and put them in their place.
Chinatown Chinatown, the 1974 film that takes place in 1937 Los Angeles, takes an interesting look at how people in power view law. So far in class we have analyzed films in which the “bad guy” is a criminal, with the exceptions coming from Chinatown and Michael Clayton. The major difference between these movies comes from the protagonists in each, a private detective and lawyer/ fixer respectively (even both the actors are great, Jack Nicholson and George Clooney, wow). The film shows two major themes within this area. The first is corruption within normally trusted entities and the second is ignorance in the pursuit of justice.
As Judith Butler once said, “Masculine and feminine roles are not biologically fixed but socially constructed.” Throughout history and even today, being too masculine and being too feminine affects society's views on people. Individuals can’t be too much of one thing or they will ultimately be judged. Throughout, City of Thieves, characters are illustrated as withholding subversions and conformations to the established gender roles. Consequently, David Benioff uses City of Thieves to illustrate subverting and conforming gender roles through the main characters, Kolya, Lev, and Vika.
A Civil action is movie based on a true story of court case about environmental pollution that took place in Wilburn, Massachusetts, in the 1980's. The court case revolves around the issue of trichloroethylene, an industrial solvent and its contamination of a local source. Jan Schlichtmann An American Attorney specializing in personal injury Law filed a lawsuit over industrial operation that "cased several children to die from leukemia and cancer, as well as a wide variety of other health problems, among the citizens of the Town."1 Jan originally rejects a seemingly unprofitable case, Jan finds an environmental issue involving groundwater contamination that could be a good case against "some defendants with deep pockets."2 The local tanneries
Largely, this linkage is dependent upon the unshakeable culture of male hegemony that envelopes culture, including decided gender roles and their symbolism and the previously established phallic imagery of guns. However, the feminine repulsion with weaponry is further reliant upon the definition of femininity. When analyzing the female relationship with guns and femininity itself, it is essential to look at the traditional literary representation of women in response to violence or heroism. Often, literature is a less veiled representative for societal values and trends; art truly does mirror life (Solis ii). Michael Solis argues
Oppression has been a tactic used for thousands of years in order to conquer, enslave, and control those who are different from the social norm. But one group that has been and continues to be oppressed is women. Women make up half of the population and yet men were able to manipulate their lives and create a society that prevented them from being treated fairly and equally, a problem many still face today. The male dominated society that has been present for centuries can be seen entirely throughout the nineteenth century. The unhealthy dynamic between men and women can be seen in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, and Margaret Fullers Woman in the Nineteenth Century. Not only did the oppression of women present itself in literature of the time period, but it also emerged through clothing, seen in both stories and in real life. The mistreatment and misconceptions men had and continue to have about women can be shown within the literature, clothing styles, and dynamic between men and women of the nineteenth century.
When the criminal justice system was established, the main objective was to create neutrality and fairness between the sexes. Even though people might believe that there is no such thing as ‘stereotyping’ in the criminal justice system, it is quite obvious that women are constantly being look down upon because of their sex. In general, women tend to be treated like fragile objects that could break at any moment; the truth is that women can be strong and courageous just like men. Society stereotypes women and the criminal justice system is no different.
We have all heard of strange and gory stories that are supposedly true, experienced by a friend of a friend. Whether true or not these so called "urban legends" tend to circulate throughout society thriving on each individual's fears and curiosity. What most people don't realize is, within these tales lies the attitudes and values of a community. These tales do not survive throughout the years solely on the basis of their entertainment level, but due to the fact that they reflect society's fears and anxieties. In dissecting these tales one can indefinitely find the social fallacy against females that has existed for decades, as well as the fears women have against men. However, more importantly, the values that society hold are
Wealth was not the only source of power used in this movie. There was corporate power, intimidation, desperation, persuasion, compassion and finally the power to do what is morally right. Desperation is the first source of power that comes onto the scene of Erin Brockovich. We see Erin, interviewing for jobs, getting into a beater car and then a terrible car accident thanks to a speeding emergency room doctor in a jaguar. After her lawyer falls thru in court and she walks away from the accident penniless, the desperation to put food on the table for her three kids and pay the rent gets her a job at her lawyers office. By no means did he want to hire her, but she was desperate and stubborn and refused to leave until he agreed to hire her. Once hired, she starts compiling the casework for the Jensen's and thus tumbles onto the mysterious findings of the medical