Steve Jones's The Biggest Question Of Science, Nature Or Nurture?


22. Humans have about 25,000 genes and more than a million different antibodies. How is this possible?

Genetics can help answer questions about our traits and why we look different and advance in different ways from each other in the world. Chapter 1 explains the basics about how genes work, and the portrayal of DNA and RNA. Chapter 2 describes RNA more in detail and it consist of the explanation of the human genome. Specifically, Chapter 3 clarifies how evolution works and how it relates to genetic and medical research. Furthermore, Chapter 4 and 5 explains the knowledge researchers have about genes role in health and diseases, and how society is affected with the advances in medicine and science given approximate credit to these researchers.

Both normative and nonnormative influences and nature and nurture influences both shed light on human development over childhood and adolescence. The nature and nurture debate refers to whether particular aspects of development are a result of inherited characteristics (nature) or obtained characteristics (nurture). The answer to what characteristics were obtained by which source is a difficult task as there is still much to learn about the way genetic markers work and how their patterning influence organisms. Instead nature and nurture should be looked at as a intricate ecology (Claiborne, Drewery, Paki, & Peters, 2014). This is where characteristics are not considered to have only a single source but can linked to a contribution of our genetic

The simple writing style and lightness of the somewhat delicate topic makes this book a fantastic read that can be enjoyed by a range of people. Experts in the subject field of biogenetics and curious high school kids can both appreciate this book for what it is; and insightful, fascinating, fresh look at the world of biogenetics and what it can mean for you personally. I say personally because scientists have com to

One of the most enduring debates in the field of psychology is the controversial idea of nature vs. nurture. Throughout the endless history of the debate, no clear conclusion has been met, only hypotheses have been formed. At the center of the debate, human behaviors, ideas, and feelings are being determined, whether they are learned or inherited. Determining physical traits, such as eye color or hair color, are simple because they are hereditary traits. The idea of having a certain personality, intelligence, or ability is under discussion because scientists cannot determine if these traits are learned, or predetermined by genes.

Dr. Moalem picks through them one by one, ultimately to suggest his thesis is not as far-fetched as much as it may initially seem. He then goes on to talk a little but about the concept of penetrance and epigenetics. There have undoubtedly been many advances in the field, but there is a good general platform that is set up as it is clearly mentioned that genetics is not black and white. In order to support his argument by using a study from Duke that involved baby

The lecture started off with Dr. Kitchens-Kintz discussing the importance of genes and what their functions are in the human body. For example, the fact that they are what contains the blueprints for proteins in our bodies. These proteins are then used for multiple important functions such as making up enzymes, hormones, and other materials such as collagen, which is an essential building block in hair, skin, nails, and bones. However, sometimes parts of genes get distorted throughout our life either from exposure to things such as sunlight or due to copying errors. These errors can can do one of three things: absolutely nothing, benefit, or hinder the individual. Furthermore, with the advancements in technology,

that genes and environment must be considered in conjunction during the analysis of traits and

The changing of Genetics has been around for awhile now, ever since the 20th century it is a set of beliefs and practice that aims at the improving the genetics quality of a human population . there was this mad scientist who stayed in a wooded house, that looked as if it was haunted , in the woods , he had been bullied all his life and once was even called “different and too ugly for society “, but when he got the head coaching job at YCHS every changed .

We think that Ms. McGonigal is much better speaker than Mr. Levitin. We delighted to watch how she delivers her message clearly and simply. Also, she involved humor through her talk in elegant ways that help her to connect with her audience. Her background slides were supportive and very simple to understand biological process that we are not familiar with. Above all, her talk was built logically in a brilliant, creative and interesting way. On the other hand, we didn't enjoy that much from Mr. Levitin talk, mainly because his monotone speech. He looked tired and had bad performance on the stage. We think that he should be more charismatic speaker and to be or look more passionate about his topic. Also, we don't think that he used good examples

The development of human being during the entire course of life, focus on biological and psychological growth (Berk, 2010). Human development hold several outcomes that are altered by both positive and negative influences. Genetic (nature) and environmental (nurture) influences place significant impact on human development. In fact, Pinker (2004) submits that behavior is the result of a complex collaboration among inheritance and environmental factors in human development, ultimately supporting that nature-nurture work collectively (Pinker, 2004).

TH Morgan concluded that chromosome play an important part in heredity and the passing on genetic traits

Human growth and development is an incredibly complex process, influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. At certain times and for certain developments, genetic influences dominate, whereas at other times, environmental influences are more powerful which emphasizes the fact that genetic and environmental forces are always working together (Sigelman and Rider, 2009).

Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by philosophers in the past and by scientists more recently. Philosophers such as Plato argued that all knowledge was inherited from your parents and when you were told something you didn’t learn it you were just reminded of it. Aristotle however argued that all humans were born with a blank slate and built on it with influence from there environment. In the 1700’s the empiricists and the internalists took over the argument. They fought through letters explaining there point of views and denouncing the others. This leads to Pavlov coming up with the idea of behaviorism in the early 1900‘s. Behaviorism became the new wave of Psychology and influenced a lean towards the nurture side. It was not

The classic debated topic of Nature versus Nurture has been and will always be a quarrelsome subject in the scientific world. Meaning, the issue of the level to which environment and heredity sway behavior and development in a person. Nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. This means the behaviors is based on the inherited makeup of an individual and is an influence of the growth and development of that individuals’ all through life. On the other hand nurture is causes of behaviors that are environmental. This Intel’s the influence is from the individual’s parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences that individual exposed to during life. However, these concept of ideas supports the inborn genetic framework,