preview

Steroids and Drug Testing among Athletes

Good Essays

The primary difference between athletes taking steroids and assembly line workers taking opioids is that the latter could be directly endangering those around them in an immediate way. Whereas athletes do serve as role models for young people and should not be normalizing the use of steroids, their choice to dope is one that has little direct impact on other people. Therefore, the argument can be made that certain jobs and certain tasks do not warrant aggressive drug policies to curtail the use of substances by employers.
Oakland Athletics pitcher Brandon McCarthy "lives in fear," because his employer has become aggressive with random drug testing (cited by McCauley, 2012). McCarthy is clean; he says he is "legitimately nervous knowing you're 100 per cent clean," because of the possibility of sabotage or a freak false positive (cited by McCauley, 2012). Surely, a personal rights-based ethical framework needs to be taken into consideration when applying anti-drug policies universally to every profession. The right to privacy also needs to be taken into account, especially with regards to employees like Sue Bates, who was fired from her job with no consultation or warning. Her employer, Dura Automotive Systems, suddenly altered their policy of drug testing to include prescription drugs legitimately prescribed by doctors and not bought off the street for recreational use (Zezima & Goodnough, 2010).
The problem with the hard-lined policy currently being practiced is that it

Get Access