State Of Texas Case Analysis

Although Etzewieler allegedly knew Bailey was intoxicated, he still allowed Bailey to use his vehicle while he

The Police of Harris County was informed of a weapons disturbance in a private residency. The officers found two individuals of the same sex engaging in sexual, (sodomy), behavior. However, the way the police officers enter the premises, was not at all questioned.

In 2000, the Arlington Police Department received information stating that Earnest Leon Voyles had exchanged emails that contained sexual content with a fifteen year old girl from London, England. According to this informant the fifteen year old girl, “Amy Chang”, had been solicited for sex by Voyles and had arranged to meet with her in London to engage in a sexual relationship. Sergeant James Crouch of the Arlington Police Department was unsuccessful in contacting “Amy Chang” to verify the arrangement but was not successful, however, he was successful in verifying that Voyles was working as a teacher at a junior high located in Arlington, Texas.

1.What were the Interstate Compact Statistics for TDCJ in 2015? Number of Texas probationers supervised out-of-state: 6,787

Within certain circumstances, liability is based on the accused 's action, which is also known as an act of omission or negative act. Regardless of the defendant 's motive, the failure to act supports a finding of criminal liability only when the s/he is under a binding legal duty, has the necessary knowledge to behave aptly and carrying out his or her responsibility is possible. Even so, there are instances when the issue of guilt results from a lack thereof. Each element must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and decided as a matter of law by the court. With regard to any crime, all criminal elements are distinguishable and identifiable for the careful analysis of each issue. Take for example the difference between points of dispute in Proctor v. State (1918) and People v. Newton (1973) when reading Criminal Law: Cases and Methods.

The state of Texas found out that “no Mexican ancestry person had served on a jury in 25 years ("Hernandez v. Texas.").” Furthermore, the lawyers disputed that it was unfair that they were no Mexican Americans that can support the equal protection of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The trial court judge denied their motion after listening to their arguments. After listening to this case in the District Court, and the Texas Court of Appeals, this case was now going to be reviewed by the U.S Supreme Court, which was Gus Garcia’s plan. It was expensive to go to trial in the Supreme Court but since every Mexican wanted all these injustices abolished, they were raising money so the lawyers can take the case to Washington (Carlos M.

Maria A. Cardona, write this opinion to support the majority opinion on the case of T.M v. State of Florida.

When selecting judges in Texas many first get their start when they are initially appointed by the Texas governor. Though this usually happens to fill up any vacancies that there may be on the bench (Champagne and Harpham 257). Aside from being appointed by the governor, most judges in Texas get selected to serve by Texas voters. These elections are known as partisan elections, meaning that the judicial candidates’ political affiliation is listed on the ballot. Party affiliation is one of the most important factors in judicial elections. Before 1978, most judges were Democrats due to the state being largely Democratic. In addition, the governor of the state was usually a Democrat and would usually end up appointing Democratic judges (Champagne

Hernandez V. Texas is based in the 6th amendment, “guarantees a defendant a right to counsel in all criminal prosecutions”. This case is a very well-known because there was too much of discrimination towards Hispanics. Pedro Hernandez is a resident at Edna, Texas, a Mexican guy who was accused of convicting the murder of Joe Espinosa who was also a resident of the same area. Hernandez was found guilty by an all-white jury going all the way to Supreme Court. Their lawyers argue that it wasn’t fair for them not having a Mexican American as a jury and there was only Americans, because in that way they would take advantage of a Mexican American to do whatever they wanted to do with him. In the 1950’s was when this case occurred and also there was a harsh discrimination to Mexican Americans from the white people at the United States. Mexicans and African Americans were just a “waste of time” for the white people, that’s how the white people thought about them. History, discrimination and how did this issue impact police, court, and corrections are essential things that will be cover.

In the State of Texas, we have a rather odd way of selecting which judges will and will not be able to have a job in the State of Texas. The way we select them is the same way that we decide who is going to be the governor of the State of Texas, we elected them. There are many flaws with choosing election as the way of picking who will be judges. Some of the flaws are that there will possibly be a lack of minority chosen, voters tend to know little to none information about the local election let alone the candidates up for judges, and finally people contributing to campaigns. While few people know that this how we elected judges in Texas, but even fewer realize the consequences the will continue to pile up if we do not do something to put an end to this ludicrous way of choosing an influential position of office.

About once a week I have to transfer a case to another Oklahoma County. I have to word process five letters and mail them to the correct county asking for permission to transfer the case. I also do judgement and sentences, which is the paperwork that is sent to the prisons for the inmates to do time in prison. These are very important and have to be correct because they are the proof of how much time the inmate will do and if they were incorrect, the inmate could do too much time or not enough time. My word processing and proofreading skills are very important and I use them daily.

In addition to African Americans, Texans had used a system of racial profiling to convicted Hispanics as criminals between the 1920s and 1950s. Historian Oscar Jaquez Martinez states that “many European Americans sustained the racist premise that since Indian blood ran through Mexicans vines, this made them naturally, irrational, confrontationally, prune to committing to crimes.” This proves that many American states including Texas believed that Hispanics like Mexicans caused trouble. As a result, the texas justice system along with many other states had persecuted many Hispanics through their justice system. According to Oscar Jaquez Martinez, “Mexican immigrants were more likely to face flag flagrant violations of civil rights, trumped-up

“According to estimates from the 2013 ACS, the U.S. immigrant population stood at more than 41.3 million, or 13 percent, of the total U.S. population of 316.1 million. Between 2012 and 2013, the foreign-born population increased by about 523,000, or 1.3 percent. U.S. immigrants and their U.S.-born children now number approximately 80 million persons, or one-quarter of the overall U.S. population.”People for in other countries that come to America are known as immigrants. They can be categorized as illegal or legal immigrants. Recently there has been a case (Texas v. United States) which corresponds with immigration in the United States of America. Now, it is seen as inhumane to break up families in the United sates, It’s illegal for states to sue the U.S., and the general public does not need time to react to the new program in motion.

In the case of Hernandez vs. Texas, which took place in the 1950s, an all white jury sentenced a man of Mexican American descent, named Pete Hernandez to life for murder. His attorney in accordance to LULAC, was assisted by none other than the brilliant civil rights lawyer of the time, Gustavo C. Garcia. The defense team went out of

The Texas judicial system has been called one of the most complex in the United States, if not the world. It features five layers of courts, several instances of overlapping jurisdiction, and a bifurcated appellate system at the top level. The structure of the system is laid out in Article 5 of the Texas Constitution.