1. Espionage is the act of spying on a person or organization by gaining unauthorized access to information about that person or organization. a. Provide at least five examples of organizations that have been or might be targets of espionage. Why would they be targeted? Who would want to steal their information? According to NY Times, in 1993, Volkswagen was accused of spying on General Motor’s German division named Opel. Several executives moved to Volkswagen and took trade secrets with them. This resulted in a large settlement where Volkswagen had to repay 100 million dollars and buy 1 billion dollars in car parts from GM. The ability to gain future concepts to improve their auto market enticed VW into possibly stealing secrets to gain an edge. http://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/10/business/vw-agrees-to-pay-gm-100-million-in-espionage-suit.html In the Washington Post there was also a story about Hilton and Starwood Hotels in a corporate spying situation. This included Hilton finding a lot of Starwood’s confidential information at Hilton and in the homes of Hilton employees. Hilton’s release of a new hotel brand Denizen and use of the documents to upgrade other luxury hotels resulted in litigation, but no settlement has been made yet. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/22/AR2010122205827_2.html After reading The Guardian’s article on Chinese’s company Green Dam stealing over 3000 lines of code from Cybersitter to enforce an anti-pornography
With a longtime fascination with history, I decided to write my essay on a topic not usually discussed in history classes, the role of spies during America’s war of independence. I was interested in the ways spies played various roles in major events during the revolution and their uniquely complex ways of gathering intelligence, given the many limitations in the 18th century. Fighting against the British army, a superpower in its time, I’m hoping to discuss the significance
Espionage, the use of spying to obtain secret information regarding the intentions and capabilities of other persons, groups, organizations, or states is largely seen as a modern twentieth-century phenomenon (Burds, 2012). In reality, it is one of the oldest political and military acts, appearing in historical and literary accounts since the beginning of recorded history. A vital tool of statecraft, espionage shapes foreign policy and changes how wars proceed. Unbeknownst to many Americans, subterfuge and secrecy would play an important role in the Revolutionary War. George Washington, commander of the Continental Army, was well aware that he needed reliable intelligence to triumph over British forces which outmatched and often outnumbered his own. To achieve this, Washington would establish numerous spy networks over the course of the war, the most successful being the Culper Spy Ring.
Espionage at the commencement of the American Civil War was not an organized system; however the war necessitated the development of more structured intelligence systems for both the Union and the Confederacy. By the middle of the war the dimensions of the espionage system had augmented significantly. Thus espionage came to play a critically important role that affected general’s decisions in both the North and the South, ultimately affecting the outcome of the Civil War as a whole.
Before World War One, people were allowed to watch, write, or say anything they wanted to as long as they weren’t harming anyone. However, the Republicans and Democrats were arguing over whether or not we should have more censorship. The Democrats wanted more censorship, but Republicans didn’t want more censorship. As it was stated in document 1, they didn’t want the president to be able to block himself from getting criticism. The Espionage and Sedition Acts were put in place so that people couldn’t interfere with the success of the army, it was to help find people who were disloyal to the army.
Counterintelligence is one of the most vital areas of the United States intelligence system, and is heavily intertwined with our history, laws and ethics. According to the National Security Act of 1947, counterintelligence (CI) is defined as “information gathered and activities conducted to protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations conducted by or on behalf of foreign governments or elements thereof, foreign organizations or foreign persons, or international terrorist activities.” It consists of five activities and functions: operations, investigations, collection, analysis and production, and functional services. In this aspect, CI is unique in that it is both an activity and its product. U.S. intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) collect and analyze both CI information and foreign intelligence. There are many counterintelligence activities that the United States is involved in, as both CI and foreign intelligence play an important role in countering threats to our country’s national security. Among these most controversial and misunderstood activities are counterespionage and disinformation.
When you think of the Civil War you think of bloody battles, muskets exploding, bayonets sinking into enemy soldiers, and people giving their lives for the sake of either the Union or Confederate States and what they believed in. But most people do not think of one very important factor in the Civil War. Espionage. Throughout this paper we will be exploring the secretive world of espionage in the Civil War from both of the opposing sides.
Espionage is “the practice of spying or of using spies, typically by governments to obtain political and military information” (source 5). The art of Espionage played an important role in the Civil War for both sides because leaders would send out committed men and women to gather intelligence and scout the actions of the opposing troops. Both sides worked extremely hard to figure out how to spy on their enemies in order to seek out and send top-secret, valuable information back to their governments. These armies were dependent on spies because they didn’t have any other military intelligence assets available during the war that could that could serve as the means to provide them with this crucial information. During the War Between the States,
The Espionage Act of 1917 was a federal law passed after World War I to ensure nobody had the choice to voice their opinion on what the Military was doing to “protect themselves” against what the german military was giving them. This is historical as if it was not enacted the world would probably be a lot worse off than it is now.
In 1917 the United States government enacted a much disputed law entitled the Espionage Act. It had been debated in the years leading up to the United States involvement in World War I. Faced with outspoken citizens who were critical of any direct participation in the war and with a growing fear that any public dissent would make it difficult to conscript the needed man power for U.S. involvement, President Woodrow Wilson’s administration looked to make such actions criminal. Throughout the almost 100 year history of the Espionage Act it has come to blows with the United States Constitution, particularly the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech, on many occasions. Thousands of American’s have been charged under the Espionage Act’s
The United States has the most capable intelligence apparatus of any country in the world. The information produced by various agencies gives the United States a substantial advantage when it comes to understanding world events, predicting and preparing for unsettled times, fielding military forces, and making a host of other political and economic decisions. From an ethical perspective, it means that the United States Intelligences information can create the risk of security for the United
The term “Covert Action” brings with it a connotation of shadowy figures wrapped in secrecy and intrigue. It also brings with it a substantial amount of moral questions as to “what is right.” The use of covert action has been widely publicized since the early seventies, but trying to find out the truth to these events has been difficult to say the least. What is even more difficult, is historically recording these events into categories of successes or failures. These operations are difficult to dissect because of their secrecy and although events have been recorded, some facts simply aren’t apparent. This paper will seek to identify the complex issues associated with covert operations.
It is not hard to see that the scandal would cause a horrid blow to VW’s image. Until the incident, VW had, like many other German companies, the reputation of “German engineering” (Robertson, 2013). However, instead of using that innovation to develop diesel-fueled cars compliant with U.S. standards, it decided to try to scam its way in the market. Not only did the company admit to having 11 million cars with software intended to cheat tests (Gates, Ewing, Russell & Watkins, 2017), it also plead guilty to “destroying evidence in an elaborate cover-up” (VW Admits Emissions Cheating and Cover-up, 2017); building further distrust among its consumers.
Counterintelligence: exposing, preventing, and investigating intelligence activities on U.S. soil; foreign espionage strikes at the heart of national security, impacting political, military, and economic strengths.
Data can be collected through human sources, satellites, wiretapping, signals, and internet traffic. However, intelligence organizations must be in compliance with the law to ensure that they are not illegally collecting information (Chesney, 2012). Collection occurs because a threat is likely to occur or agencies are trying to find out what information our foreign adversaries possess about the nation’s assets. Intelligence collection occurs in both domestic and foreign territories. Intelligence agencies collect information about foreign adversaries in order to exploit their weaknesses or vulnerabilities (Gentry, 2008). Furthermore, government agencies and political leaders want to discover which of the nation’s assets are seen as vulnerable to the enemy (Gentry, 2008).
The “Red Scare” is very prevalent in the United States, especially with allegations of Soviet infiltration in the government from Senator McCarthy. As a result, a fear of espionage has risen. Politicians and the general public has internalized the fear of espionage to the extent that propaganda has been released and