Special Victims Unit Vs. CSI: Crime Scene Investigation

Not all primetime crime shows are created equal; some bend forensic realities at different degrees than others depending on sub-genre. According to Hon

1630 – 1770 A mound of sand in the Hudson River Michael Paauw obtains the Island Known as Gibbet Island 1775 – 1865 The Island is purchased by Samuel Ellis New York State buys the Island from his family Used as a military fortification 1865 – 1892 The island is vacant after the Civil War Government starts to construct an immigration station on the Island Total cost of construction on the Island was $75,000 1892 First immigration station on Ellis Island opens January 1, 1892

In Season 1 of CSI: NY, “Three Generations is Enough” focuses on two murders that happen to be connected. The episode starts in a stock trading building where a suitcase is found unattended. The room is cleared and investigators analyze the suitcase, matching the fingerprint on the suitcase to a database. When they get to the apartment, they find it has been ransacked, presence of metal shavings, a degasser, and a computer that has a missing hard drive. Later, another detective finds a suspected suicide in front of a church. Next to the body, three cigarette buttswere found, and when they search the church, they find a candlestick, part of a tooth that came from the victim, and a letter. After questioning potential witnesses, detectives eventually find a burned car that has the body of the stockbroker inside of it. They also find a gun, the missing hard drive and a burned piece of paper. When they analyze the hard drive, they find an email from the victim from another person, Charles, about an argument right before the death took place. The piece of paper in the car indicated where the car had been prior, and they search the location, finding money and a device used to make bullets, linking the location to the metal shavings found in the apartment.

One major difference I noticed about CSI on T.V. compared to real life is the way that things always seem to be fast and easy when in reality it takes a long time and can be complicated. For instance in many shows such CSI Miami, Bones, etc. when they test blood samples, DNA, fingerprints or other things it seems to only take minutes, when in reality it can take weeks or months to get the actual results. Another thing would be the amount of education and training needed. You must be able to perform many things such as drug analysis, trace evidence and much more. Forensics isn't as easy as just taking pictures and bagging evidence. It requires years of education and months of training which is rarely mentioned in the shows. Some T.V. shows rarely

The CSI impact can best be portrayed as a wonder where TV "taught" members of the jury will probably not convict somebody who is blameworthy on the grounds that strategies and strategies they saw from the anecdotal TV program were not connected for the situation. Max Houck, Director of the Legal Science Initiative at West Virginia University, says "The CSI impact is essentially the impression of the close dependability of legal science in light of the TV appear". The CSI impact is a late marvel that can be ascribed to the impact of broad communications. The term began showing up in legitimate vocabulary in 2003; around 3 years after the show and its twist offs turned out to be uncontrollably well known TV alternatives for the American open.

The definition of forensic science is any scientific research, method, or theory used to analyze evidence in an attempt to solve legal cases (Cho). In recent years, there has been growing public interest in forensic science, arguably because of the numerous television programs that glamorize its practices. This phenomenon is part of what is known as the CSI effect, or the process through which devoted fans of popular crime dramas develop unrealistic notions of forensic science methods, practices, and their applications in real life cases (Mancini 544; Stevens 37; Ley, Jankowski, and Brewer 52). The CSI effect has had more negative impacts on forensic science and society than positive impacts, especially in regards to what goes on in the

Law & Order: Special Victims Unit series premiered on the NBC network in the fall of 1999 as the first spin-off of the successful crime drama, Law & Order. Law &

You use some math in this job. You have to go over forensics such as calculating how far the gunman was from a gunshot victim. To be a detective for that unit you would work as a regular police officer and after time you would be able to transfer. They mostly use schematics to process crimes scenes.

The main reason for the CSI effect being bad is simply because the jury expects high level of evidence to be brought forth when in many cases all that evidence is not available to them and many of the science that they show in shows such as CSI, criminal Minds, NCIS, Law and Order and many more does not even exist. These jurors have unrealistic demands for physical

There is a lot of distorted information when it comes to watching the televisions shows on television such as CSI, Dexter, Criminal Minds, and Law and Order. In real life situations, usually the person that is investigating the crime is not the same person that does the crime lab. On televisions shows, they will only work one crime scene at a time and not many crimes that have been committed. As well the show will not show the numerous amounts of crimes that an investigator has to deal with on a day to day basis.

Serial murder involves victims that are strangers with no relationship to each other. Since serial murder investigations lack obvious connections between the suspect and victim, investigators attempt to determine the motivations behind the murders, in order to narrow their investigative focus. The behavior of a serial killer may evolve throughout the series of crimes committed. There are three main types of serial killers including; the medical killer, the organized killer, and the disorganized killer. The medical killer is rare to find and they are usually highly intelligent and know how to cleverly conceal their murders.

As someone who absolutely loves to watch any sort of crime show CSI: NY and Criminal Minds: Beyond Borders and 48 Hours; it makes sense that the realities of law enforcement officials can be distorted. It would be highly boring to watch law enforcement officials just sitting at their desks doing paperwork. These shows are designed to engage the viewers and keep them wanting to watch the shows. Truth be told, it is part of the reason I became interested in adding the criminal justice minor to my educational background. There’s an actual term for this called the “CSI Effect, in which any of several ways in which the exaggerated portrayal of forensic science on crime television shows”.

Some crimes are obvious, and can be solved via a simple investigation, perhaps with a chain of custody, or with an item they left behind. But what about the crimes that aren’t? What about the crimes made by careful criminals, the crimes with evidence that can only be found in ways other than the naked eye? These crimes must be solved by a CSI, or Crime Scene Investigator, who is normally part of a Crime Scene Investigation(CSI) unit. However, these are still not completely standardized in a police unit. Some areas, such as Chicago Heights, do not have a CSI unit. How, then, do these areas solve these types of crimes? Most police members have basic CSI training, such as blood detection or cordoning off areas, but they don’t know how to use the machines in a lab such as a CSI.

Since the time that the scientific science dramatization "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" turned into a tremendous hit and generated its fans, reporters have been worried about what they instituted the "CSI Effect." The hypothesis behind the effect is that fans of the well-known show disguise misguided judgments about the law that they bring with them into the court as jurors. In this way, the trepidation is that the TV show is at last influencing the results of trials - and not in a great manner. Criminal justice researchers have started to study the inquiry of whether nationals who are called to serve on juries bring unreasonable desires and convictions to the court as a consequence of TV projects. The impact that these projects may have on the jurors, their desires, and their choices is known as the CSI effect.

The term “serial killer” was derived from a man named Robert K. Ressler, who, in the 1970’s deemed this term because of the term the English used; “crimes in a series” and because of the serial films he grew up watching. (Freeman, 2007) Prior to the term serial killer, people would use the terms, mass murders and stranger-on-stranger crime. The definition of a serial killer, according to dictionary.com is; “a person who attacks and kills victims one by one in a series of incidents.” Obviously, we understand that a serial killer commits murder more than once, and on different occasions, but what helps police and investigators differ between stand alone murders compared to a serial murder case? What techniques