A select team, representing our present is sent into our future through a time machine recently invented. These include two scientists, two ordinary citizens (man and woman), a senator, a judge and a priest. They will arrive in a land/air craft which doubles as a mission control, which after their expedition, they will return to, and return from the future to their present.
On their arrival to the future they fly over rolling green hills, but see no signs of civilization or life. They approximate that they are 1,000,000 years into the future. Their geographic computers informs them that they are where South America should be, but the land form is different and they can recognize no familiar landmarks or indications of cities. They decide to fly lower to get a
…show more content…
The priest amazingly has only sustained minor injuries, probably due to his position in the craft at the time of the accident. He was below deck while all the others were at their stations top side, which it was the top of the craft that received the initial impact... Those there were probably dead before the craft finally crashed landed.
The priest slowly wanders through the the wreckage and finds the other scientist, who has sustained life threatening injuries... He realizes the others are most certainly dead, even before discovering them, which he eventually does.
His most urgent task now is to save the life of the scientist, knowing that if he dies, he is all alone... He will need his expertise if he is to survive hear, not to mention returning to the present. He doesn't want to think the inevitable... This craft was their only way back to the present, and sadder still, nothing is working, no way of communication... It's demolished, beyond repair.
He tears his way through the wreckage, hunting for medical supplies, canteens of water, food and any thing he thought necessary for he and his sole companion's
He portrays scientific research as dangerous by declaring that a “single step can also take one of a cliff.” This further emphasizes the courage prerequisite to scientists and hearkens back to the fear of the unknown. The fact that all of one’s work may be dashed into pieces by a single finding in the laboratory conveys the tenacity of researchers. Barry’s description of the process by which a scientist decides which “tools” are appropriate to the task at hand, exemplifies the tedious and often inglorious labor involved in most scientific research. Barry finally predicts that if a scientist is successful a “flood” of colleagues and others will “pave roads” over the paths so painstakingly laid, taking one within minutes to the very place the scientist spent so long searching for. This suggests that in the wake of major discovery, the actual pioneer of this breakthrough may be forgotten. Countless researchers have made valuable contributions to the human understanding of the world, and faded into obscurity over the course of the history of science. Barry’s conceit conveys the fact that, like exploring uncharted wilderness, scientific research can be both treacherous and thankless, but all the more noble for
They arrive in a land called
Did you know that Africa is one of the most diverse languages speaking Continents in the world? Definitely, there are an estimated 1500-2000 languages spoken in Africa, all due to the fact of colonization, (Google,2018). While It could cause the mass deal of death, we should colonize South America because the standard of living and quality of life could ascend for all the countries in South America. Also, South America and North America could obtain new and better goods. Finally, when we colonize South America we could make it more industrialized.
It is really peaceful at the end of this story, however, the experimental process of how Dr. Abnesti and his group do in story reminds me of the affects brought through development of scientific technologies. I believe that, among so much findings in the recent years, artificial life form and nuclear energy issue are two major concerns in public. Again and again I have heard different opinions about these topics, though, even considering having an objective vision, I cannot distinguish whether these inventions are good or bad, potentially practical or risky. These are grey areas to me. Probably, the only method to see whether these kinds of inventions are pros or cons resulting from science is time and future history.
Strongly linked with civil society were the political institutions; the political institutions were more of a catalyst for change not based on what they accomplished, but rather what they failed to do. For one, their winner take all systems were flagrantly ineffective. While many thriving nations use the winner take all system, its implementation in South America was deplorable. This resulted in intense gridlock and difficulty in changing leadership and policies. Those in power abused this inaction and employed extralegal methods for carrying out their policies and agenda. With the technocrats and experts unable to enforce any real political change, the economic situation in Chile, Brazil, and Argentina continued to spiral downwards. This caused
In Africa during the 19th and 20th the British , French , Other European nations took over and accordly enslaved millions of Africans. Now in the year 2030 the United States should colonize South America to prevent those same countries from repeating Africa's bloody colonial history. South America has good resources that others want, but we want to peacefully work it out with the United States to avoid problems and we can make a good profit.
Sometimes nobody remember that eve can be harm. Everyone seems to ignore her, they called her when they were on the point of dying. She seems like a rough person and she do everything to reinforce that image. But, as everyone, she has weak spot and those were things for her impossible to admit. One of then was the fact of being ignored, to them to think she was useless.
Europe went to Africa to colonize and gain resources in return the people of Africa gained new technologies it's was a win-win for both sides. The people of america will be colonizing south america by the year 2030, the U.S. should colonize south america because They need to become more civilized so we don't have to hold their hands anymore so they need to establish public services. south america has an abundance of resources since they don't have the technology to harness these resources we will give them technology in return we get a percentage of the resources.
While trying to figure out what to do with the body they go have a look at the cook Mrs. Ho to find her murdered in the kitchen, with the knife in her back. On coming back to the study Mr. Boddy has vanished to be later found bleeding from the head in the washroom attacked with the candlestick.
The colonization of Africa began in the 1870’s and ended in 1900. During those times the were put through hard times. There were wars, military invasions, and imperialism because of the Europeans. South America is in a state of turmoil but they do not need to be colonized. South America never asked for America’s help in the first place. The United States should not colonize South America because the natives freedom would be taken away from them and it can cause cultural drifts, which may lead to wars.
It is the year 2030 everything is changing the governments globally are tearing apart. And so many countries are at war, America is willing to go on and help the people who are in need by colonizing countries/continents. But It’s now up to me as a member of the government committee to approve whether or not America as a nation should go in to colonizing the continent of South America. As a result of what happened in Africa between the 1870s and 1900, The United States should not colonize developing continents like South America because the citizens will their lose freedom, resources and traditional cultures
Scholars have referred to the South as “America with a difference”. This difference has tried to be defined by different historians, and it has produced various strains of the American South history. Therefore, the south has drawn various historians, novelists, and poets in the quest to define the central theme of the southern history. This has largely interested many scholars as the south was known to be settled by a different Englishman, its experience of poverty since it was a nation that only knew abundance and its loss in the civil war as it was known as a nation that always had success (Gerster and Cords 11). Some writers have tried to define the difference of southern America regarding its passion for agriculture and slavery.
America should not colonize South America because America could take away people’s home trying to get the resources they need and destroying their agriculture in the process. Over a period in time Africa's agriculture suffered as well as their trade because they didn’t have enough workers. (Things Fall Apart, 2012). The natives agriculture failed because of the Europeans being their and because they were getting killed by the British and the other tribes. When the natives started to stand up for themselves they got their villages destroyed. “Although they had some success, the British put down the movement by arresting its leaders and destroying their villages.” (McDougal Littell, 2009)
Introduction: “Colonization is the act of setting up a colony away from one's place of origin”(Colonization, 2016). Remember when the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock? That was the beginning of a period of colonization. South America has many helpful resources, tools, land and etc to improve America if they would colonize them but it would be a bad idea.
He is frightened and needs help. They all move inside the tent where a discussion takes place between the expedition