In “Something Instead of Nothing”, Klosterman quests what motivations make people to talk, specifically in a formal interview setting. Some parts of the book write about the famous interviewers to gather their thoughts on the art of the interview. Errol Morris says, “I don’t think we have any idea who we are. I think we’re engaged in a constant battle to figure out who we are.”(Klosterman) From her answer, I think is about determining ourselves. But it’s also about representing the desired image. As Klosterman writes, “If you make a mistake while being interviewed — if you admit something you’d prefer to keep secret, or if you flippantly answer a legitimately serious question, or if you thoughtlessly disparage a peer you barely know, or if …show more content…
But why do we talk? First, I think we talked because we need to explain, we need to answer, and we need to let people know what we think about. When we make mistakes and we did not explain to people, then people will think about you in their ways. If we did not talk and say it loud to let people know, no one will know what you think about, how much sorry you want to say, and also how much grievance you have. Therefore people will misunderstand each other. At the end, people will think everyone is a bad person, also lead to this world become very darkness and evil. Second, I think we talk not only to get to know each other, also have a chance to know ourselves. While we talking to other people, we can know the person from their words because people always add their own thoughts in their conversation unconsciously. Sometimes we are not what we think we are. So we can know what they think about us from their conversation. We can keep our advantage and get rid of our disadvantage to become the perfect person. Third, I think we talk because to communicate. Communicating is very important in our life. It means that people can express their own needs and concerns. We also can learn from the lessons we have learned and be a more effective communicator right out of the gate. If happen anything, people know how to calm down and communicate to each other. At that point this world will be more peace, everyone can be
Do traffic signals make a difference when drivers are conducting their vehicles? In U.K. the roads have less signs and are smaller roads than in the United States. The United States has great amounts of traffic signals and symbols all over the road to make the driver more aware. In the U.K. accidents do occur but not that often has in the United States. In the Unites States every second there is huge amounts of accidents going on over the nation. John Staddon in his magazine article “Distracting Miss Daisy” tries to persuade that traffic control is making traffic more dangerous because we do not pay attention to the road, but to the signals.
Being able to communicate effectively with others will help them understand us. Our conversations should be clear and with proper dialogues. Communication should be fluent, direct and specific that way we don’t get lost in a river of words. I do agree with you that we should always get answers for our questions. Also the fact that since we are in an online campus effective communication is the key to help ourselves learn everything better.
It has also come to mind, should I interview someone I do not know very well rather than a close friend. I begin to question if I or my friend will be comfortable with the questions. Therefore, I am almost certain that I will interview someone that I do not know very well. I believe this will give me a realistic picture of what to expect.
Larry Karson, of the University of Houston’s Department of criminal justice, wrote his article about how a Grand Jury gets put together in the state of Texas. He clearly explains the process of picking the members for the Grand and Petit Jury and compares these processes with each other. Like two of the other articles I have mentioned, this article also explains the historical background and how Grand juries first started. It goes into depth of how racial discrimination in the Texas juries plays a roll with the proper functioning of the juries and how this problem can be averted.
2.1 People communicate to let other people know their needs and wishes. They also need to tell others if they are in pain and how they are feeling, and to put their anxieties at ease.
In Bj Gallagher’s article “Donald Trump Is the Epitome of Everything the World Detests -- And Admires -- About America”(Sep.2, 2015), She Implies the positive and negative attributes in Donald Trump, and whether you should vote for him or not. Gallagher first demonstrates by showing the negatives of Donald Trump and his “arrogance” in an article written by Paul Thomas; Gallagher then argued the positive, admirable side of him by comparing his life to one we would all like to live, and to conclude she suggests that Trump is a “fresh breath of air” for millions of Americans by demonstrate that he is unique compared to past presidential leaders. Her purpose is to surpass his brash ego in order to to show he is worth putting your trust in.
In the article, “ Get the Name of the Dog” written by Justin Willett it explains how interviewing is such an important skill. Willett explains that being a reporter has been just like journalism. Quality is key to writing a captivating content. By interviewing you get more solid information. The most important thing is having good interviewing techniques. These skills will allow you to insights and knowledge from different people. All these interviewing techniques will help get your superior stories which helps in content making. In the text it states” ”.Interviewing overall helps build a better story and gets many different people more interested. It’s such an important skill to be able to do a good interview, it gives more knowledge to
Nat Turner: Mr. Garrison I do wish I could agree, but few of these men (looking down at Fitzhugh and calhoun) have shown no respect for god.
In “Bring Back Flogging”, Jeff Jacoby addresses the problems within America 's criminal justice system. He gives many reasons why imprisonment simply does not work, and suggests that corporal punishment should be used as an alternative. Published in the Boston Globe, a newspaper well known for being liberal, Jacoby provides a conservative view and directs his argument towards those who strongly support imprisonment and view corporal punishment to be highly barbaric and inhumane. However, in order to shed light on our current situation, Jacoby discusses the dangers that we face though our criminal justice system a nd shows concern that imprisonment is doing more harm than good. In effect, Jacoby looks to the past for solutions, and
A rhetorical analysis assignment is to see how an author tries to present his work to a certain group of people. There is present certain meaning in all the texts and it is up to the author to communicate it in the required way. The purpose of this assignment was to review the article and see how the author made use of different strategies. It appears that a major aim that the author had was trying to convince the readers about revenue based financing. The author made use of several strategies as they will be discussed further down. There are many examples of rhetorical writing strategies that an author can use to make the writing all the more powerful. There is a very crucial reason why writers actually go for this sort of writing. The simplest answer would be to have their writing be more powerful and effective on the reader. The document that will be analyzed today is an n article written by Verne Kopytoff. The title of writing basically talks about how revenue-based financing is a good solution for business. The title itself sheds positive light on the article and states that the better the business does, the faster you will pay. The author of the article is Verne Kopytoff who is a technology journalist. He is alum of the San Francisco Chronicle and the New York Times. The article was written on February 05 2013.
People communicate in order to establish and maintain relationships with others, to give and receive information and instructions, to understand and be understood, to share opinions, knowledge, feelings, and emotions, to give encouragement and show others they are valued.
Charles Nordhoff noted, blacks “will tell you precisely what you want to hear.” Interviewers’ questions, though unconsciously, “constantly communicated with their subjects the kind of evidence they want, the length of answers and even the manner in which answers ought to be offered” (Davidson 181). The personal relationships also created an interesting dynamic during an interview. Interviewees often knew interviewers personally and said, “I don’t want to tell you nothin’ but what to please you” (Davidson 183).
Everyone communicates through behaviour whether good or bad, we should try on a regular basis to reflect on our own behaviour as this could contribute to the behaviour we are observing or being subjected to.
When we talk to each other it shouldn’t be because we want to hurt each other's feelings and trying to put people down just so we can we can feel better then them. We should want to make people feel good and it shouldn’t be because they are the
Chapter 5: Make It Safe: How to Make It Safe to Talk about Almost Anything When things go wrong in crucial conversations, we assume the content of our message is the problem, so we begin to water it down or avoid it altogether. But, as long as your intent is pure and you learn how to make it safe for others, you can talk to almost anyone about almost anything. The key is to make the other person feel safe. To do this, there are two things the person needs to know. First, they need to know that you care about their best interests and goals. This is called mutual purpose. Second, they need to know that you care about them. This is called mutual respect. When people believe both of these things, they relax and can absorb what you’re saying; they feel safe. The instant they don’t believe them (and it can happen instantaneously – even with those we have long and loving relationships with), safety breaks down and silence or violence follows. To restore safety in the face of silence or violence, you must restore mutual purpose and respect.