Sokoll V. Feuer Summary

Judge Reibman held a hearing in Oct. 2014 on contempt charges against Dr. Kolecki for not showing up at the evaluation, but the charges were later dropped. Dr. Kolecki thought there was ex parte communication between the judge and Mrs. Kolecki’s attorney, Waldron, but later agreed that wasn’t the case.

The case complaint cited violations of Milich’s First Amendment rights, violations to the federal Family and Educational Rights and Privacy Act and violations of the state’s Sunshine Laws, according to court documents.

Facts: On Sunday, July 13th, near Canton North Carolina in 1930 an undercover federal agent befriended the defendant Sorrells during the Prohibition. Martin, a Prohibition agent posed as a tourist and visited the defendant’s residence accompanied with three other residents of the county that were familiar with the defendant. While at the defendants home the Prohibition agent ascertained that Sorrells was a veteran of the World War and a member of the 30th Division, the agent apprised that he was also a veteran and member of the same Division. Agent Martin then, on multiple occasions requested for the defendant to acquire liquor for him that he would later take back to Charlotte for an acquaintance.

As you are aware, this office represents Gerry and Mary Goldman in this matter. Please note that our clients have informed us that you have contacted them directly without this office’s permission by serving them with your Notice of Videotaped Discovery Depositions, which you signed. As you are also aware, your direct contact with our clients is improper. Please do not contact my client directly unless you receive instruction from this office to do so.

The Government has a system in place, laws to abide by to protect everyone that will be involved. Mr. Green is Houston’s city controller that is responsible for approving and directing the city’s money to future projects. Currently, he is blocking the City Councils vote on contracts worth $1.5 billion and this is not the first time he has blocked it. Before he pushes the contract for a vote he wants to review the bids, while digging deeper than anticipated or what everyone expected. Is it within his right to to look how the bid went and how the employees scored the bid? Is he wasting the city’s money just to push this off onto the next controller? What’s the requirement for contracts, bids and what the city requires?

Bar counsel has requested that Solomon explain where the funds for the cash deposit came from, as well as how his payment benefited the Elmore Desvigne estate. To date Solomon has not provided answers to these questions. Due to Solomon’s lack of response bar counsel has sent a subpoena requesting that he appear at the Office of the Bar Counsel on March 31, 2016. The subpoena was sent via certified mailed on March 8, 2016, to his home, his P.O. Box, and his counsel Arnold Rosenfeld’s office. Based on the evidence already obtained, bar counsel believes there is sufficient evidence to file a Petition for Discipline

Vladislav Skobelev filed a complaint on September 16, 2014, against Attorney Yuri Levintoff. Levintoff allegedly offered to handle Skobelev’s legal matters for “free” in turn for two separate loans of $3,000 and $10,000. When Skobolev attempted to collect repayment of the loan, Levintoff decided he changed his mind and would be charging a fee for the handling of Skobolev’s legal matters. Levintoff has allegedly violated Mass.R.Prof.C. 8.4(c).

You recently wrote me about the Commission’s Complaint filed upon my behalf. After careful review of your drafted complaint, I conclude that there were eight errors in comparison to my original complaint filed with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.

Sometime in October, I asked you for help, to please find out about this particular attorney disciplinary record, this was with respect to my son's accident. You expressed that you were going to inquire, look into more about the attorney in question once you return to work on Tuesday from your Columbus holiday. I was looking forward for your info. to explore into the possibilities of attaining and secure a good attorney to represent my son in the event of filing a law suit against the person who hit my son on his bike. But to my bad luck, lo and behold, Gina NEVER followed suit on her promise.

which ended in a plea. As the case continues to take hold, particular statues, like client-attorney

Pursuant to the email request concerning Ms. Kathleen Niederhofer’s case on August 5, 2015; Neblett, Beard & Arsenault has enclosed an electronic copy of the client’s file.

Do you know how to save time and money by preparing for a meeting with an Oregon attorney? Here are some questions you could ask Stewart Sokol & Larkin at the first meeting: “What are my rights and obligations?”, “If I go to court, what will happen if I lose?” and “Can all lawyers advise me on services related to justice?” Also, write the names and addresses of potential witnesses, if any, and make a list of questions for them.

The United States Supreme Court case Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011), full case name: Edmund Brown; Governor of the State of California and Kamala Harris; Attorney General of the State of California v. Entertainment Merchants Association and Entertainment Software Association, was a landmark Supreme Court case dealing with the constitutionality and technicality of California’s Assembly Bill 1179 (2005).

The opposing party issued a request for production of documents of Ticket Booker’s files which they later agreed to narrowed in scope. In response to the request our firm had to review over one million pages of potentially responsive documents. Our firm first had to locate these

At this time, I want to thank you for the interest shown towards Bishop, Dickinson & Plath law firm. I also wish to set forth our agreement as to payment. I ask for a security retainer of $500 U.S. dollars. My firm will hold these funds in the Lawyer’s Trust Account until they are applied to future charges for services rendered. You will be billed approximately every month depending on the amount of work. The firm will refund any unused fees and there will be no charge for the initial consultation that we had. It is difficult to estimate the amount of time and expense that will be necessary to adequately represent you. I will advise you of any procedures that will substantially increase the amount of fees.