preview

Soggy Disintegration Case Summary

Decent Essays

I would like to Thank you for allowing Silver & Gold LLP represent you in the potential personal injury claim that James and Carina Malone may have against you. You can be assured that you are in well capable hands and we will figure out if there could be any claims brought up against you and if so where we will go from there as far as the best defenses. From the facts that I have gathered I understand James and Carina Malone has brought a personal injury suit against you, due to an injury their eleven year old daughter Maria Malone received by slipping on a piece of artwork, which you refer to as "Soggy Disintegration" located in the pond while on your property uninvited. Your question for us is whether the Malones have a viable personal injury claim against you under the attractive nuisance doctrine. The attractive nuisance doctrine states that a landowner is subject to liability to a physically injured trespassing child if the injury is caused by an artificial condition. Therefore before we can determine if the Malone's will have a personal injury claim against you under the attractive nuisance doctrine, we must first determine if the artwork Maria Malone slipped on is considered a natural or an artificial condition. We understand that the pond involved in the …show more content…

Ms. Herrera named the area "Soggy Disintegration". Ms. Herrera received $30,000 to create " Soggy Disintegration". You also stated that the land had originally been a pond when you moved there. The original size of the pond was eight feet by twelve feet and four inches deep. However, you hired workers to make the pond twenty by thirty feet with some deeper parts. In addition, you also added special touches to the pond by collecting rocks from the surrounding desert and a quarry. You used these rock pieces that you gathered to create rock towers in the

Get Access