Social Regulation On Cigarettes

Should the government regulate E-cigarettes?E- Cigarettes are bad for you and cause harm to your body. E-cigarettes can kill you or you child if the get ahold of the “juice.” The E-cigarettes can last up to 72 hours and with one cigarette it will only up to five minutes or shorter. Even though some people may think that they are better for you but they are actually wrong the “Juice” makes people/kids think that they are not harmful because of the name of what the “juice” is called. Almost 480,00 died because of cigarettes/ one regular cigarette.

John Doe is an 18-year-old resident, Colorado. He’s active in his community and volunteers through the local public library, he’s a genuinely nice guy, and he’s a smoker. A few months ago, John Doe decided that he wanted to minimize his health risks from smoking cigarettes, so he switched to a new alternative: an e-cigarette. Electronic cigarettes contain no tobacco, and vaporize a vegetable glycerol fluid that contains nicotine, mimicking the feeling of smoking a burn cigarette without the tar, dangerous gases, and unpleasant smell (Block). In most states, smokers can “vape” in public places with their e-cigarettes, receiving the nicotine of a burn cigarette without complaint from others. Heavy smokers find that they can use e-cigarettes to gradually decrease nicotine and many use it as a gateway to quit smoking. Yet in the absence of regulation, sale of e-cigarettes to minors is only prohibited in twelve states (Lopes), and this is a definite problem. Adolescents may see vaping as a cool new thing to do and become addicted to nicotine. The lack of regulation in the e-cigarette industry especially contributes to this, as companies create appealing advertisements displaying a variety of new flavors. Furthermore, without Food and Drug Administration (FDA) screening, e-cigarette ingredients are unregulated and this could lead to unsafe or downright harmful products.

E-Cigarettes are battery-powered vaporizers that simulate the feeling of smoking, but without tobacco. Their use is commonly called vaping. Instead of cigarettes smoke, the user inhales an aerosol. Commonly called vapor, typically released by a heating element that atomizes a liquid solution known as a e-liquid, the user activates the e-cigarette by taking a puff or pressing a button.

I think e-cigs should be regulated by the FDA in the same way that regular cigarettes are. According to a new federal report in the short article, 1.78 million children and teens have tried the battery-powered devices. Studies show that children and teens that use this technology will most likely to use regular cigarettes. This seems to be the gateway to starting a bad habit. If the FDA knows this, then why aren’t they being regulated? It’s almost like the FDA and the tobacco companies are working together to turn a profit.

Cigarette Companies in Capitalism Tobacco is one of the largest industries contributing to the economy of US. As reported by The Tobacco Atlas, the revenue of global tobacco industry is about a half trillion US dollars annually. In 2010, the combined profit of Coca-Cola, Microsoft, and McDonaldswas 35.1 billion US dollars, equal to the combined profit of six leading tobacco companies.(Alday)Tobacco industry is now harmful than ever. Although people realize that tobacco is harmful to one's health through tobacco taxes, smoke-free public places, advertisement bans, mass media, and health warnings, many still smoke with the influence of propaganda that cigarette companies have made. These companiespromote young smokers through the use of

Cigarettes are poison this planet in several ways, the air with the toxic smoke, out lungs, causing cancer and not even just the ones smoking them, the streets with the buds leftover thrown out. Then there’s the fire hazard, of throwing them out without putting them out. Solution to ending this? Phase out sales.

If a product kills million of consumer would we keep it out in the market? If an industry is costing the federal government 955 billion dollars would we keep subsidizing it? If there is a group of the work force that could be using their skills to aid in the hundreds of other areaas that they could be helping why wouldn’t we take action already? In 1920 the United States Government decided that the consumption, production and transportation of alcohol had enough of a negative effect on the nation as a whole that they banned liquor all together. The same action should be taken with the consumption, faming, distribution and even the possession of tobacco and cigarettes. Cigarettes should be banned because they have a countless amount of health consequences, tobacco farmers cost the federal government billion to bail them out instead of reinvesting that money to aid in really any other are of farming that is struggling, and lastly because of the environmental impact and footprint that the growing of tobacco and manufacturing of cigarettes produces.

Electronic cigarettes, also known as e-cigs or vape pens are so often negatively looked upon as sources of addiction, rather than the health cigarette substitute they really are. E-cigarettes allow the delivery of nicotine to the blood without the nasty side effects caused by tars and carcinogens in traditional cigarettes. The electronic cigarette was patented by Herbert A. Gilbert in 1963, who lived in a society where smoking was generally accepted or even the norm but he saw the dangers of smoking tobacco and was one of the first to try to innovate alternate intake methods. 40 years later Han Lik, a chinese businessman, began to further expand on Herbert A. Gilberts idea of delivery of nicotine without the plethora of harmful chemicals in a lit cigarette. An electronic cigarette is a battery powered device often designed to look like a regular cigarette, inside the e-cig is an atomizer which heats up a liquid containing nicotine. When heated up the liquid becomes a vapor that can be inhaled, similar to cigarette smoke.

The above graph shows that at the original price level(P), the marginal private benefit(MPB) of cigarette is greater than the marginal social cost (MSC). This means that cigarette is over-consumed and the green triangle between MSB and MPB shows the welfare loss. The government may decide to increase the indirect tax to cigarette as the cost of cigarette(healthcare) outstrip the taxation it collects. The supply curve shifts to the left from S=MPC=MSC to S+tax. The quantity consumed will decreases from Q to Q1 and the problem of over-consumed will be solved as the yellow triangle that represents the decrease in consumption is equal to the original welfare loss triangle.

Health concerns are the primary issue for nearly all of the stakeholders. Employees care about their job security and integrity for their occupations. The government is responsible for ensuring the safety and overall welfare of its community. If tobacco is known as a health hazard to the citizens, then it is the responsibility of the government to act on it. The customers of the tobacco industry are another huge factor. Of course, they care about their health, the ingredients of the product, the quality, the cost, etc. Then there are the owners and shareholders who, while they may also care about the reputation of the business, they are mainly concerned with the continuation of the corporation and the profits from it.

It seems the majority of eighth graders in this study have not tried cigarettes and the majority of them believe their friends would strongly disapprove of them smoking cigarettes occasionally. According to the research, adolescents who come from lower socio economic households have more of a risk when it comes to tobacco use. Since the socio economic status of the respondents is not known, this causes an implication to the researcher. Because of this, additional research needs to be conducted to determine the socioeconomic status of the respondents and doing a cross analysis on tobacco use within 8th

Cigarettes are the number one cause of death in the U.S. and yet they are still on the shelves. People know the damage tobacco does to the body, and yet they still continue to smoke, chew, and sniff it. Cigarettes and tobacco products needs to be criminalized. Smoking is the number one cause of cancer in the United States. About 50 million people smoke cigarettes in the United States.

10 Really Bad Things the Tobacco Industry Has Done to Entice Kids to Start Smoking. (2016.). Retrieved April 12, 2016, from http://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/tobacco/reports-resources/sotc/by-the-numbers/10-really-bad-things-the.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/

few states have implemented laws that make it illegal to smoke in the car when there is a child within the car. Should this become a federal law where it is enforced in all states? What about making it illegal for a pregnant mother to smoke? Or parents smoking in a house with children, should this be illegal too? How far should lawmakers go with the creation of anti-smoking laws for the protection of the unborn, infants and children to an individual's personal freedom?

In the UK, smoking persists as the leading cause of avoidable death and disability and a key modifiable risk factor for the development of a range of diseases including cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive airways disease and some cancers (WHO, 2008; Murray et al., 2013). However, despite a reported decline in smoking prevalence in the UK (ONS, 2016), levels of smoking in prisoner groups are two to three times greater than in the general population and have remained intractably high (Singleton et al., 1999; Lester et al., 2003; Papadodima at al., 2009). As a consequence, prison populations experience far worse health outcomes than in the general population (Biswanger et al., 2014) and subsequently tobacco control policy in prisons