preview

Slavery, The Compromise Of 1850

Decent Essays

The factors in the regional development of the United States from 1800 onward, such as the crusades against slavery, the Compromise of 1850, and the arguments involving the admission of several states, both free and slave states, corroborate that the Civil War was, indeed, inevitable. There was no way to predict the outcome of these events; however, looking back in history, it is easy to tell that the Civil War was a ticking time bomb. By the end of the eighteenth century, the antislavery movement had helped remove most of the slavery in the North and led to the legal obstruction of the international slave trade in 1808. At first the people who opposed slavery were calm and not very violent; they expressed their disapproval of human bondage. …show more content…

At Zachary Taylor's request California adopted a constitution that forbade slavery and in December 1849 he asked Congress to admit California as a free state. He also stated that New Mexico should be granted statehood, and they should have the chance to decide whether or not to be a slave state. Congress hesitated because of so many other altercations on slavery that were complicating the debate. One of these complications was that the anti-slavery forces wanted to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, a desire that was rancorously resisted by southerners. The biggest problem, however, was the South's fear that two new free states would add to the northern majority. In 1850, Henry Clay, the front man of the issue, tried to take separate proposals that were made at separate times and wrote a compromise. In the legislation, presented to the Senate on January 29, 1850, were the provisions that California was admitted as a state; the abolition of slave trade, but not slavery, in the District of Columbia; and a new and more effective fugitive slave law. This compromise, however did not solve anything and, in fact, it only made matters worse. After a long time of arguments and debates, the younger men of the Senate took the lead. The older men had basic broad ideas which made them unable to produce a compromise. This “temporary compromise” was made up of separate measure that were voted on one by one. That way representatives of different sections could support the elements of the compromise that they favored and oppose the ones that they didn't. The Compromise of 1850 ended up being a victory of bargaining and self- interest instead of being an agreement on common national ideals. So really, they didn't solve anything, they simply voted in their own

Get Access