The main purpose of this experiment was to show that single displacement reactions between metals according to their reactivity, with more reactive elements having the power to displace less reactive elements and take their place in a chemical compound (Beran, 2014). This was supported by the results of the experiment, where solid metals were combined with aqueous solutions that contained another element, and reactions only took place when the solid metal was more reactive than the other element in the compound. Only three attempted trials resulted in a failure to produce a reaction, namely the combinations of copper with hydrochloric acid, and copper with nickel sulfate. The outcomes of these trials are justifiably reasonable because copper is ranked lower in the …show more content…
Part A.1. Sodium metal is also readily oxidized by oxygen. If the product of the reaction were dissolved in water, what would be the color of the litmus for a litmus test? Explain. What is the product?
Sodium metal is extremely reactive in comparison to hydrogen due to its ranking in the activity series, and when combined with water, it would displace one of the hydrogens in a water molecule, forming NaOH, also known as sodium hydroxide (Beran, 2014). This compound is known to be basic because it can donate a hydroxide ion, and all basic substances turn litmus paper blue (Beran, 2014).
5. Part B.1. Eliseo couldn't find the 6 M HCl and so used 6 M HNO3 for testing the metals instead. His logic? Both are strong acids. Explain how the results of the experiment would have been different.
When one looks back at the procedure of the experiment, trials 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 all use 6 M HCl for their reactions, and if this were to be substituted for 6 M HNO3, then these reactions would have still taken place, except in trial 2 because copper is less reactive than hydrogen in all cases, but their final observations may yield different colored solids and solutions (Beran,
The penny sample is next. Initaly three pennies were picked out, observed, weighed, and recorded. Then placed into the fune hood were three beakers with 25mL of 6M HNO_3 and one penny each. The reaction made by this process
In the experiment, What Goes Around Comes Around, the element copper was put through a series of chemical changes to observe whether or not the final copper precipitate had the same mass as the initial mass of the copper. The purpose of this lab is to prove the Law of Conservation of Mass, which states that mass cannot be created nor destroyed. In the experiment, if the final mass of the copper precipitate is equal to the initial mass of copper, this law is proven because the copper was not destroyed in the chemical reactions nor was it created. Copper was first combined with the compounds nitric acid(HNO3), water(H2O), and sodium hydroxide(NaOH). This mixture was first chemically separated using heat to boil out the water. The aqueous solution
5. NaCl, sodium chloride, is a common salt and it burns in the flame test.
The Cu Later lab experiment is designed to allow you to practice lab skills in implementing and performing a series of reactions. Specifically, four types of chemical reactions will occur: oxidation/reduction; double replacement; single replacement; and decomposition. You will begin with a known amount of copper metal, which, after progressing through several steps, is reproduced. In this experiment you will observe and record the various changes such as heat, color changes, and production that occur. This procedure is used to observe some chemical reactions of copper and its compounds while also performing the lab appropriately as to retain the copper as much as
When the red Co(NO3)2*6H2O crystal was added to the white NH4 crystal, and water was added to dissolve, the solution turned blue in color. As the solution was nixed, the color changed to that of a blue-purple and a blue precipitate formed. When the 6 M NH3 began to be added, the color shifted to dark purple color after 15 mL of ammonia and the amount of the precipitate was less. After 20 mL of ammonia, the solution became a red brown with very little of the blue precipitate. After 30 mL of ammonia, the solution was similar in color to an iodine solution, a dark brown-red, almost black in color. At this point there was no visible precipitate on the surface of the solution. After 40 mL of the ammonia had been added, the solution was the same iodine like color as before. When closely examined, there was a black precipitate that had settled on the bottom of the beaker. At this point, hydrogen peroxide, 3% H2O2, was added to solution. After 4 mL of the H2O2 was added, the solution was the same color and the precipitate had not changes. After 8 mL of the H2O2, there was not noticeable change. After 12 mL of the H2O2, the solution was slightly redder in color but the precipitate had not changed. After 15 mL of H2O2, the solution was the same color and no changes had occurred to the precipitate. At 17 mL, the solution began to effervesce slightly, though there
3. Carefully felt the sides of the test tube and observed the resulted chemical reaction for about 30 seconds.
this experiment had a similar scenario to part A except the metals were switched and replaced with
5. Was there any evidence that some of the copper (II) chloride was left in the beaker? Explain.
The Copper Cycle is a popular experiment used to determine if an element, in this instance, copper, reverts to its elemental form after a chain of reactions. This experiment is very dangerous because of the reactions between the strong acids and bases. In this experiment I performed a series of reactions starting with copper metal and nitric acid to form copper (II) nitrate. Then I reacted copper and several other solutions such as, sodium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, ammonium hydroxide, and hydrochloric acid to form precipitates. In conclusion my percent recovery
1. Using the information provided in the Introduction and your observations from Part 1, hypothesize as to the type of electrolyte the following solutions would be. Justify the hypothesis from a chemical standpoint.
The purpose of the experiment is to cycle solid copper through a series of five reactions. At different stages of the cycle, copper was present in different forms. First reaction involves reaction between the copper and nitric acid, and copper changed from elemental state to an aqueous. The second reaction converted the aqueous Cu2+ into the solid copper (2) hydroxide. In the third reaction Cu(OH)2 decomposed into copper 2 oxide and water when heated. When solid CuO reacted with sulfuric acid, the copper returned to solution as an ion (Cu2+). The cycle of reactions was completed with the reaction where elemental copper was regenerated by Zn and Cu
Experimental approach: In the first reaction, copper metal turnings oxidize when put in contact with nitric acid and become copper nitrate.
These reactions can be seen from just a little bit of reaction all the way up to a complete change of the entire sample tested. Some samples of those tested in this experiment which showed the chemical reaction were the baking soda/ammonia mixture, the Epson salt and baking soda mixture as well as the food coloring mixed with the baking soda and bleach. 2. Which reactions, if any, do you believe showed no evidence of chemical change? Justify your reasoning.
For the displacement reaction, an excess amount of zinc powder is added to the measured amount of aqueous copper (II) sulphate. The temperature change over a period of time has to be measured and thus, the enthalpy change for the reaction can be measured.
The main objective of this experiment is to carry out qualitative analysis to identify metal cations in unknown solution 1.