Introduction: Churchill & Reagan Winston Churchill and Ronald Reagan were both historical figures who impacted the Cold War. Winston Churchill, a British Prime minister in 1940 and avid soldier and salesman, spoke to support an idea that had crossed many minds before his: isolationism. He was in favor of staying out of foreign affairs and joining the strongest powers in the world to create Ronald Reagan. He was the president of the United States from 1981-1989, he instated impactful changes into the U.S. government and overall performed well as president of the United States. Reagan endorsed anti-communist parties and acted fairly brutally in times of war, which is why many believe the economy did as well as it did during the end of the Cold …show more content…
He uses parts of the rhetoric to further push his message and provide the audience with a better understanding of what he’s trying to say. Specific examples of rhetoric are used from page 2 to better understand the general scope of how Churchill uses rhetoric. For example, the phrase “at this time” is used to place weight on the present. Churchill is saying that the United States might not always have this status unless they enact change. The word pinnacle stands out largely in this phrase as it's used in a way that supplies the reader with the grand-ness of the situation, the word pinnacle is also used in a way that suggests that there is no going up from there. By stating they are at the pinnacle of power, they can no longer gain any more power, at least if they continue as they are now. Churchill often uses subtle phrases that often imply a committee, for example, the use of “you” indicates an informal tone. To assume Churchill writes his speech with the utmost purpose in each word, then “you” refers to the communities Churchill is attempting to bridge between Britain and the United States. By sneaking in subtle references to the great alliance he plans to create, it also surrounds the speech with this feeling of community. This is also supported in the next line “...for both …show more content…
The speech was a commentary and reflection of the Soviet Union and their attempt at communism on the eastern side of Berlin. The people of East Berlin were starving and poor under communism and Regan not only used this to his advantage to spread the word about the danger of the spread of communism but also the eradication of the Berlin wall which trapped many civilians behind closed doors. Reagan used his title, along with a comparison of the two sides of Berlin, to evoke the response he wanted from the public. He additionally uses parallels between communism and capitalism to describe the benefits of capitalism, repetition, and logic to provide his listeners with a compelling argument. Firstly, his credibility is used heavily in his speech, not only in the writing of the speech but in the performance as well. Reagan's use of complex sentences combined with a formal use of simple sentences creates a formal tone throughout the entire text. For example, “a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history”, prosperity and unprecedented are used here, giving the simple sentence a sense of urgency and importance, although it's a pretty straightforward line in context to the rest of the paragraph. His credibility plays with this strategy since he wouldn't be
This speech is famous because of a powerful man who was genuine and honest to his listeners. Although at the time known as an actor, Reagan needed to provide an ethos for himself and he did so by stating “The sponsor has been identified, but unlike most television programs, the performer hasn't been provided with a script. As a matter of fact, I have been permitted to choose my own words and discuss my own ideas regarding the choice that we face in the next few weeks.” His speech continues on in the context of persuading, rather than recognizing, or inspiring, so there are not many comparisons or metaphors, he does however use the power of parallelism. The phrase “This is a man who”, is repeated several
Paul uses many tactics throughout his imprisonment in order to keep some control over his and Annie's alliance. One effective method he uses is flattery, complimenting Annie in order to keep her happy and her mood stable. His use of this move is demonstrated on page 60 in the novel, when he calls Annie his favorite nurse. He uses it again on page 107, telling Annie that she could not be old enough to remember the chapter plays, hinting at how she looks way younger than she actually is. Paul uses this strategy to lighten Annie's mood and keep her happy, which is vital to him because Annie can become very destructive and impatient when angry, consequently being the main source of Paul's pain throughout the book. In addition to flattery, Paul
He uses a lot of pronouns in the speech to include the audience, which brings together the tone of confidence and the purpose letting everyone know it will be okay and that we will get through it together as a nation. Reagan’s speech has a strong message he achieved that through the use of rhetorical
Maybe this would open the eyes about the war in Iraq, even if you ask people on the street they usually say that the war was wrong. It really surprised me that he won the next election, at maybe he shouldn't have, and he actually cheated like the movie says he does. A lot of these clips that Michael shows in his movie, had been shown in the news and I recognized some of them, and you have to admit that Bushes behavior has been very weird. Even though some people say that this is propaganda, all lies and is stupid just doesn't want to see the facts. A lot of these things are true, and can anyone actually stand up and tell me why a war where hundreds of thousand people have died? Was it to force democracy down on a middle eastern country, how
Quotations from the Text Commentary/Responses to the Text 1. “Everything at Devon slowly changed and slowly harmonized with what had gone before. So it was logical to hope that since the buildings and the Deans and the curriculum could achieve this, I could achieve, perhaps unknowingly already have achieved, this growth and harmony myself” (Knowles 12).
We had to make the country from the “swamp” it was into something that others are envious of now or the “stars”. Reagan believes that our country is worth fighting for, but he is not sure that it a war that he would want to take part in. He believes it to be a “cheap demagoguery” and that we should be able to make agreements to live in peace without sacrificing the blood of our loved ones. He believes there is only one sure way to avoid war and that is to surrendering. He ask the rhetorical question of “APPEASEMENT OR COURAGE?” trying to urge each person in the room to think about the choices of going to war and the choice of staying home and building an even beautifuller
The purpose of Reagan's address was to inspire the people to revitalize the American government and rebuild the economy. Reagan emphasizes the importance of returning power to the people, and he motivates the people to take part in improving the economy by calling the everyday working man an "American hero." Reagan creates the argument that a better future is in the hands of the people, not in the hands of the federal government. He specifies that the people are the everyday heroes that keep the economy alive. Reagan builds unity and a sense of togetherness in the American people through the use of rhetorical strategies like Kairos, anaphora, and rhetorical questions. He also drives his argument home by directly addressing the people, and by
This emotional appeal is important because it stresses the influence he had on not only people, but entire nations. Arnold Bennett, an English writer, said Reagan embodied “‘the great cause of cheering us all up’”. Reagan fulfilled his presidential duties as well as working hard to make his people happy and cheerful. Reagan used the term “evil empire” to refer to the Soviet Union. Thatcher wrote, “His policies had a freshness and optimism that won converts from every class and every nation, and ultimately, from the very heart of the ‘evil empire’”.
The author has an overall defensive, but confident tone as he explains his viewpoint on war and its effects to his audience.
In a political snafu the Reagan administration sold arms to Iran so that they could secure the release of US hostages and also generate enough money to support Contra. This became known as the Iran-Contra Affair and steeply affected Reagan’s popularity with the people. (Mayer, Jane and Doyle McManus) Reagan’s willingness to use violence alarmed many, especially when he took up the position of the Soviet Union being purely evil. After Gorbachev became a chairman representing many soviet political parties and took on a position of negotiator, Reagan became less militant and more open to discussion, seeing Gorbachev as a good man who came out of an evil system. A significant event during this period was Reagan’s speech at the berlin wall, which urged Gorbachev to bring down the wall and reunite berlin. As tensions rapidly declined the Soviets declared that they would no longer interfere in allied affairs.
For the audience he gives them examples of how government interference hurts Americans and also allusions to past times such as the revolution and how the founding fathers did not want a big government. He shares that he has “an uncomfortable feeling that this prosperity isn’t something on which we base our hopes the future.” Reagan’s ability to connect with his audience was rare and unlike many of his colleagues. Whether the topics he spoke on were always relevant to that of the listener, it did not always matter.
As the situation seemed, “In each case, Reagan blocked Soviet influence, but the damage done to local communities and to the international reputation of the United States, as in Vietnam, was great” (Henretta 992). Reagan thought it was dangerous for the Soviet Union to keep growing as an influence around the world. Communism was influencing many countries and ruining their relations with the US. because they refused to help Communism grow. He saw this ideology as an evil, that oppressed the people.
Reagan called all the people in the Soviet Union, east Berlin, and even their capital city Moscow to search for a better way for their government. He told the leaders of the soviet union to tear down the wall, he told the people on each side of the wall that there was another better way of doing things. He blatantly told the prime minister of the soviet union to tear down the Berlin wall. Reagan negotiated that both sides would reduce the amount of nuclear arms. The amount of guts it took to stand toe to toe with one of the most powerful countries in the history of the world and dared them to defy him without demanding. Reagan was the John Wayne of the political world, he didn’t use fanciful language to deceive the people. He spoke plainly and openly about what he thought and didn’t need to please everyone, He was just a loved president and should be up there with George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. He knew what it was like to have to work for everything he owned. His use of the call to action was perfect and urged the people to search for
“You and I have a rendezvous with destiny” is perhaps the most famous line from the speech. People are inspired by the speech because Reagan gives the American people hope for their future and their children’s future. His use of repetition conveys to us that we “have the ability and the dignity and the right to make our own decisions and determine our own destiny”. Repetition is a powerful rhetorical technique that Reagan exercises to emphasize unity among the American people. Reagan kept his audience eager for more. He would expose an issue or problem and then create a solution. Exposing faults within the existing government Reagan is able to crack part of the “once believed” solid foundation of the U.S. government. He also exposes how the seediness and greediness of the government is leaking into the minds of other fellow Americans. He states situations where individuals are taking desperate measures such as divorce, in order to earn a higher salary so they can provide for their families. Reagan tells us that there are ways around this and that these issues are not individual but collective.
Sir Winston Churchill’s speech, ‘We Shall Fight on the Beaches’ was a wonderful piece of moving rhetoric. The diction that Churchill uses to deliver his message is not so advanced that one cannot understand him easily, but still manages to portray a sense of Churchill’s deeply intellectual status