preview

Sinews Of Peace Rhetorical Analysis

Better Essays

Introduction: Churchill & Reagan Winston Churchill and Ronald Reagan were both historical figures who impacted the Cold War. Winston Churchill, a British Prime minister in 1940 and avid soldier and salesman, spoke to support an idea that had crossed many minds before his: isolationism. He was in favor of staying out of foreign affairs and joining the strongest powers in the world to create Ronald Reagan. He was the president of the United States from 1981-1989, he instated impactful changes into the U.S. government and overall performed well as president of the United States. Reagan endorsed anti-communist parties and acted fairly brutally in times of war, which is why many believe the economy did as well as it did during the end of the Cold …show more content…

He uses parts of the rhetoric to further push his message and provide the audience with a better understanding of what he’s trying to say. Specific examples of rhetoric are used from page 2 to better understand the general scope of how Churchill uses rhetoric. For example, the phrase “at this time” is used to place weight on the present. Churchill is saying that the United States might not always have this status unless they enact change. The word pinnacle stands out largely in this phrase as it's used in a way that supplies the reader with the grand-ness of the situation, the word pinnacle is also used in a way that suggests that there is no going up from there. By stating they are at the pinnacle of power, they can no longer gain any more power, at least if they continue as they are now. Churchill often uses subtle phrases that often imply a committee, for example, the use of “you” indicates an informal tone. To assume Churchill writes his speech with the utmost purpose in each word, then “you” refers to the communities Churchill is attempting to bridge between Britain and the United States. By sneaking in subtle references to the great alliance he plans to create, it also surrounds the speech with this feeling of community. This is also supported in the next line “...for both …show more content…

The speech was a commentary and reflection of the Soviet Union and their attempt at communism on the eastern side of Berlin. The people of East Berlin were starving and poor under communism and Regan not only used this to his advantage to spread the word about the danger of the spread of communism but also the eradication of the Berlin wall which trapped many civilians behind closed doors. Reagan used his title, along with a comparison of the two sides of Berlin, to evoke the response he wanted from the public. He additionally uses parallels between communism and capitalism to describe the benefits of capitalism, repetition, and logic to provide his listeners with a compelling argument. Firstly, his credibility is used heavily in his speech, not only in the writing of the speech but in the performance as well. Reagan's use of complex sentences combined with a formal use of simple sentences creates a formal tone throughout the entire text. For example, “a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history”, prosperity and unprecedented are used here, giving the simple sentence a sense of urgency and importance, although it's a pretty straightforward line in context to the rest of the paragraph. His credibility plays with this strategy since he wouldn't be

Get Access