preview

Similarities Between V For Vendetta And The Crucible

Decent Essays

Both Alan Moore in the novel ‘V for Vendetta’ and Arthur Miller in the play ‘The Crucible’ utilise stylistic and language features to explore the central themes of power, rebellion, and justice that consequently develop the idea of mass hysteria as a social construct. The portrayed power in both texts regards the exploitation an erroneous degradation of civilians rendered defenceless by the overwhelming hysteria of their counterparts. However, the context and depiction of power within both texts varies, as Moore presents power as a fascist government whilst Miller presents power as the exploitation of fear derived from religious ideologies. While both portray rebellion through the characterisation of the protagonists, Miller presents rebellion subtly through the protagonist’s mannerisms and cognition whereas Moore, a self-proclaimed anarchist (Moore, 2009), characterises the protagonist as a rebel intent …show more content…

The presence of justice within both texts is evident, ‘The Crucible’ displays a corrupt justice system that is influenced by religion and thrives off the exploitation of fear. Contrastingly, the justice within ‘V for Vendetta’ is executed by anarchist vigilantes in aims to improve the authoritative constraints on the civilians, consequently, deconstructing the government’s control due to the minimisation of mass hysteria. The literary techniques utilised by both Miller and Moore varies, however, both texts demonstrate the influence mass hysteria has on the behaviour of civilians’, despite differences in audience, culture and context. The apparent difference in socio-cultural context, target audience, and form further reiterates the idea of mass hysteria, as both Miller’s and Moore’s varied perception of hysteria is developed alternatively through different perspectives, structures, and context. However, both develop mass hysteria through the

Get Access