While Quakers and Puritans may just seem like two simple yet mundane religions, there’s a lot more to them than meets the eye. For instance, their varying views on righteousness are truly remarkable. This can be displayed by the Puritans' behavior concerning their stern beliefs relating to the biblical teachings on righteousness. Additionally, evidence can be shown by the Quaker's morality regarding equity along with how it influences their actions. Moreover, authentication is visible in the contrast between the Quakers and Puritans relating to righteousness. Lastly, documentation refers to the Quakers and the Bible’s beliefs about righteousness. In this essay, I will explain the two very influential religions: Quakerism and Puritanism. Studies have indicated that the Puritans' demeanor was shaped …show more content…
As you can see, both religions have similar yet different beliefs based on righteousness. Interestingly, both the Bible and the Quakers possess a lot of beliefs regarding righteousness. The Quakers believed in interacting with peace and justice towards others. (Richard Tuckett, University of Birmingham) Similarly, the Bible emphasizes the importance of interacting with everyone with love and equality. (NIV, Leviticus 19:18, Galatians 3:26-29) Supplementary, the Bible states that to be ethical you should obey and adhere to God’s commandments and do what is right. (1 John 2:3-11) Therefore, as demonstrated, the Quakers and the Bible have closely related morals regarding treating others. The Quakers and Puritans have strikingly similar beliefs, while still having differences related to righteousness. It is evident that both of their beliefs regarding righteousness deeply affected their conduct. These were shown through the Puritan's actions influenced by their firm beliefs, regarding teachings on righteousness, which opposed the Quaker's conviction in fairness shaping their
As the Quakers branched out from England in the 1650s, they brought with them to the Massachusetts Bay Colony an engrained eschatological belief of millennialism that was only further strengthened as they faced increasing religious persecution while in the Colony. Yet just a few years after the persecution, and cases of martyrdom, the Quakers began to shift their dogmatic principles from those emphasizing the impending end times, to messages of pacifism and peace. The wars of the Three Kingdoms in the mid-seventeenth century and religious intolerance of the Massachusetts Bay Colony served the Quakers’ claims of an eschatological end. This emphasis was then foregone with the intervention of British Imperial authorities forced religious tolerance in the colonies after 1660, which then gave an authoritative support for an emerging emphasis on pacifism by the Quaker witnesses in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. This shifting religious emphases of Quaker doctrine can be illustrated as having been directly affected by the role British imperial authorities in the North American Colonies.
In 1676, Robert Barclay wrote the Apology for the True Christian Divinity in response to the reiglious and political persecution that the Quakers were receiving from non-Quakers.1 In the apology, Barclay seeks to explain fifteen propositions that make up the Quaker faith in hopes that King Charles II and his people will see that the Quakers do not deserve the persecution they are receiving because of their beliefs. He also explains how their beliefs were sound and could be explained with scripture.2 Even though some of the Quaker beliefs may go against the other Christian denominations that were present or were forming at the time, Barclay’s apology was well received by its audience, and becomes a classic that both Quakers and non-Quakers can use as a reliable source that summarizes helps to better understand the Quaker faith.3
In today’s modern society, not many people around the world practice their religion as much as people used to in the older days. There may be certain exceptions, but generally religion in most places around the world is not as strict on its people as it used to be. Looking back on the Puritans in this book shows how religion was used to shape people and society itself.
There is no doubt that writings of Jonathan Edward’s and John Winthrop had a tremendous influence in the Puritan movement in the new world. They helped set values and establish order in the new communities. Both writings deliver on puritan principles and had a critical role in shaping much of the puritan religious beliefs, but granting all this they are tremendously different. The reason why these writings have so little in common, despite both being puritan doctrines, is because of the different situations each was written in. “A Model of Christian Charity” and “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” were written about one hundred years apart, in two different centuries, and most importantly at two different stages of the puritan movement.
The Quakers believed that God wanted a separation in the church and the state. On the other hand, Quaker fined people who missed sundays. Due to some debt that king Charles owed, The Quaker founder, William Penn, got some land. He immediately knew that he wanted to use the land for the Quaker colony. His dream of making the colony was a success. This colony had some great outcomes- for example, Some notable People that cane out of the Quaker colony included Thomas Paine ,Arthur Eddington, and Walt Whitman. They also strongly believed in self worship over a congregation. The Quakers were quirky people, but they did have a very good moral stance about tolerance. They accepted all people. The catalyst is to inform (purpose) scholarly students or someone looking for information about the Quakers(audience). The genre of this article is a religious research study. The context of this article is relatively the same as the audience because it is most looked at among scholars. This article appeals to logos because all through the article the author make statements that suggest that the Quakers were better than any other religion at that time.This article uses division to separate the main points. He divides up the main aspects of the Quakers transformation between the England persecutions to the Quaker establishment after religious tolerance was established. This article is extremely
Puritans were a group of heretics who immigrated to the New World under the Massachusetts Bay Company for religious freedom. On unsettled land, the Puritans were able to develop their utopia, built on similar beliefs and values. The Puritans value system was centered on family, the community, and relationship with God. These common commitments fueled the Puritan’s pious and hardworking lives, and ultimately, influenced the political, economic, and social development of the New England colonies. The values of the Puritan body influenced the political development of New England colonies.
Focusing on some of the most well known and taught settlers of the Americas, the Pilgrims, we see how they created their society. Both document one and three of this chapter along with the first essay talk about the structure of their society. Along with this the highlight the religious intolerance and tolerance and how it was incorporated in daily life. When referring to these texts we see the idea that Puritan society
This is shown greatly in John Winthrop’s city upon a hill speech because during this he states that the Puritans are above every other country and colony by saying, “For we must consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. So that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause Him to withdraw His present help from us, we shall be made a story and a by-word through the world” (Winthrop, 1630). In other words, what Winthrop is saying is that if the Puritans as a colony failed it would not only be an embarrassment but also because they believed that God was upholding their colony they were being watched by every other country and colony. This clearly shows that the Puritans wished to not only isolate themselves from the rest of the world but also it shows that the Puritans thought of themselves as a higher caliber than others. This is very contrasting to the Quakers for several reasons. This is because the Quakers were accepting of all into their community unlike the Puritans and wished to not isolate themselves from other countries and colonies but wanted to connect with them. For example, in William Penn's letter to the Native Americans he states that it would
They had their own reform from the Catholic Church with a minister. They believed that they were the only group to go to heaven and that they were the best. The Puritans even banished, tortured and killed Quakers who chose to preach. Quakers were a part of the Religious
The Pilgrim and the Puritan settlers was both diverged from the English Reformation. The Origination and beliefs of both is similar and different in many ways. The Explanation the origination and beliefs of Puritans and the Pilgrims gives a better understanding their differences. There was difficulty for the Protestants to establish themselves in the sixteenth century. King Henry VIII was considered the monarch, who introduced Protestantism to England, though he was committed to Catholics in the beginning of the English Reformation (L.Stokes).
There were several Christian religions evolving at the time, but Puritan society in the late 17th and early 18th centuries was dominant and focused on social and economic status unlike the Quakers who believed that God lived in everyone and evoked a more positive outlook on life. These two important identifying characteristics of people went hand in hand and constituted what
John Winthrop wrote A Model of Christian Charity in 1630 aboard the Arabella. Winthrop was a firm believer in the Puritan faith and is known to have spoken this sermon on board the ship to help inspire passengers to go forth and create a “new society” focused on God “in a perilous environment” (Beardsley 1). Winthrop and his fellow Puritans were determined to establish a new society in America that was focused on doing justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly with God (9). In A Model of Christian Charity, Winthrop uses theological and biblical references to define justice as loving and respecting all those around you, despite any differences, and as living out actions God wants his people to do; this exemplifies Winthrop’s Puritan religious beliefs which focus on creating a close-knit society.
Religion had a powerful impact on Puritans lives. Many Puritan people had faith in a supreme being, God, and the teachings of his Divine Son, Jesus Christ. They’d assume that if you weren’t a good Christian they would suffer in hell, but if you were one would be saved by god. An example would be in the sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” the speaker strongly describes about how being a bad Christian has its consequences and the good things that come of being a good Christian. “Many that were very lately in the same miserable condition that you are in are now in a happy state, with their hearts filled with love to him who has loved them, and washed them from their sins in his own blood, and rejoicing in hope of the glory of God.”(152)This explains how they had a strong feeling towards god’s ways. By being concerned about their religious life and being good Christians.
Religion: In The Colonial Era The first chapter examines religion during the early foundation times of the British colonies, which would eventually become The United States of America. It was at this time in history that the New England Puritans and Pilgrims were considered to be the main focus of America’s religious foundations. It is sad and unbelievable that the Puritans and pilgrims were forced to leave their homes in England and mostly Western European countries to obtain the right to practice their religious beliefs freely. In Europe religious freedom was non-existent, you could be jailed or hanged if you did not follow the rules of the British crown.
The puritans believed in the doctrine of a “calling” to do God’s work on Earth. One could only be a part of the church clergy if they had experienced a conversion and followed the doctrine of the “calling”. However, Puritans were not tolerant to others that did not share the same religion or beliefs as them.