Similarities Between Memi And Sabu

This pair figures represent Yuny and his wife, Renenutet seated with rigidly formal posture next to him. This statue depicts a powerful couple that looks straight ahead, with their heads held up and blank eyes widely open. The form of their features and

INTRODUCTION The statue of The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu is from Egypt ca. 2575-2465 B.C, and the Statue of Gudea is from Mesopotamia of the Neo-Sumerian culture ca. 2090 B.C, however there are similarities and differences between the two.(StatueofGudea|WorkofArt|HeilbrunnTimelineofArtHistory|TheMetropolitanMuseumofArt)(TheRoyalAcquaintancesMemiandSabu|WorkofArt|HeilbrunTimelineofArtHistory|TheMetropolitanMuseumofArt.) In comparison, each statue is from a society which believed in multiple gods, and they both represent real people, with a constructed serene look to their faces. Both statues are inscribed, as well.

This sculpture represents Bodhisattva Maitreya. Bodhisattvas are knowledgeable characters who defer their sanctification to support all sentient individuals (Rambelli, 207). Unlike other Buddha statues the Bodhisattva is an invented character, not a replica of an exact character to Buddha. Bodhisattvas have several of those attributes of Christian benefactors (Gresham and Dunham, 400). They are sympathetic characters who assist congregants. Contrary to saints; nonetheless, they are not affiliated with historical individuals, hagiographies, or suffering.

Memi and Sabu sculpture is made out of limestone and white paint, and Menkaure and Wife is made out of greywacke with traces of red and black paint. Menkaure is taller than his wife, and Memi’s is the same height as his wife. Menkaure has large ears, small nipples, his arms are down to his side, and his left leg is extended forward. Menkaure has on a headdress that is around up top, and comes down in a shape of a triangular on both side on his neck. Menkaure has a beard, his hand is gripping two rods, and he has on a pattern skirt with one square in the middle and two rectangles on the side, with more cut up patterns.

The most basic similarity is that both statues are carved out of rock that was regionally local. The Statue of Gudea is craved in Diorite, an igneous rock that is also known as granite today (Diorite, n.d). The Royal Acquaintances is carved out of Limestone, a sedentary rock that forms in shallow marine waters (Limestone, n.d), and then painted. Both of these sculptures show people of royalty in the culture. They both appear very pious or serene.

This statue is indicative of Egyptian art and how they worshiped their royalty. Although

The former statue is made of limestone, which says something about the purpose of its creation. It was a stature created for a non-noble Egyptian couple. This is apparent in its unsophistication and the materials used. Limestone is a softer stone material and the statue itself is less sophisticated. The writing is brief and only tells of who the couple were in the sculpture. The details

www.metmuseum.org) “Statue of Gudea” (Gudea) is a sculpture carved from diorite, produced around 2090 BCE in Mesopotamia. This sculpture is about 17 inches tall and about eight inches wide. (2016. www.metmuseum.org)

This research paper is based on a combination of architecture and sculpture, precisely the gargoyle. The inspiration for topic was grasped from a past production paper question which requested that one create a gargoyle spout inspired by a Caribbean cultural aspect. This question deeply intrigued me, providing themes for both a sculpture piece and my research paper.

First of all, the sculpture will fill our lives with the beauty of art as citizens. For example, “the History of Public Art” article gives a background on ancient greek statues and temples, and it states that the “structures helped unite the citizens of the communities of which they stood by providing a concrete focus for national identity and pride” (The History of Public Art). For

I am originally form Egypt , so I am familiar little bit with these kind of sculptures. So effectively, The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu was Egyptian in the dynasty 4 of the old kingdom. It was discovered in 1948 by Rogers Fund. The sculpture statue shows husband and wife in the hidden statue chamber which often found in nonroyal tomb of the Old Kingdom. From my point of view, that sculpture was an indication of the social status and large wealth in the Old Egyptian Kingdom. Actually, that piece was not originally created for a purpose of royalty however this was effectively made obvious by resting place in the non-royal tombs. There would be other evidence that hints at the level of wealth of its owner. Another important point that made

Our world is full of so many grandiose monuments, eye-catching sculptures, and stunning statues, each having an individual story to tell. Thousands of them have been created however, only a small number of them are actually extraordinary and picture-worthy. This paper will compare and contrast two of those picture-worthy sculptures. Furthermore, I will examine the aspects of each of these sculptures. I will compare and contrast what each of them represents, the differences in texture, their size and their tone.

Today we will be comparing and contrasting two works of art. The first work is a statue called “The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu" (The Met, n.d.). The second statue is called the “Statue of Gudea” (The Met, n.d.). Both statues share a number of similarities and differences between each other. We will discuss the comparisons and then the contrasts while identifying the the purpose behind each one.

Sculptures came in a variety of shapes and sizes. They were often made of wood, metal, cloth, or clay. These sculptures served as personal protection figures, symbols for supernatural powers, and representation of ancestors. Most sculptures were made to represent the human body, but some cultures never carve human faces so it resembled any individual in fear of accusations of witch craft. A great example of one such sculpture is Cango and Zaire.

In the photo you will see a boy drinking from a water-whose with a bucket in his hand while the girl is patting his back. In this picture, I observed a women making sure the man is taking care of since he is the provider for the family. Also, I see a man being selfish. My view has the being selfish is displaying although the women may not been outside or something the woman deserves the respect since she is home doing domestic chores. Furthermore, I see the man has being selfish considering it is respectful for the woman to get the first drink considering she is the “woman” of the house. The picture plays both was. I was shocked in seeing statues like this in