The Historical Accounts of the New World from John Smith and William Bradford In colonizing the New World, Captain John Smith and William Bradford were both significant figures. Smith was an explorer and solider known for establishing the first permanent English colony in the New World at Jamestown, Virginia. Bradford was a Puritan who was fixed on setting up a colony where people could practice their religion freely. What makes them so alike and different? John Smith and William Bradford writings were intended for different reasons, but ended up having a few things in common. They both were leaders who established colonies. Smith and Bradford both tried to persuade people to join them in the New World. So, through their writing they hoped
Throughout time there has been people who for some reason or another cannot get along, Thomas Morton and William Bradford are no different. Thomas Morton’s and William Bradford’s had a contentious relationship fueled their narratives New English Cannon and Of Plymouth Plantation. Both Morton and Bradford attempt to soil the other’s name by writing about their contradictory experiences with each other. But who comes out of this situation the true hero, Morton or Bradford? William Bradford’s emotional outbursts and irrational thinking regarding Thomas Morton overshadows any good he has done in Plymouth, making William Bradford the anti- colonial hero.
Religion was a very important aspect of everyday life, and majority the travelers to the new world had strong beliefs. This powerful faith is shown by puritans, William Bradford and Mary Rowlandson. These two characters in both of their stories showed their strong relationship with God. They tended to be more dependent on God to show them the way, instead of them making their own decisions. Every little thing that would happen they believed was apart of God's plan, and it had some sort of significance. This helped them get through hardships and over obstacles, because they believed God was doing what was best for them. Others were more independent and believed in logic and reason, one person being the slave Equiano. Equiano didn’t have a strong
The author John Smith, a pilgrim who arrived to the Americas, wrote a description of the new land in his book “ A Description of New England ”. In this book Smith shows a wonderful world of vast food and pleasure. Also, William Bradford another pilgrim who arrived to Plymouth on the coast of Massachusetts, wrote a book called “ Of Plymouth Plantation ” in which he describes what really happened, how the pilgrims actually lived. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast both authors and their books. John Smith wrote about the wonderful place the New World was, on the other hand, William Bradford wrote about the realities and difficulties of the New World.
Thomas Morton was a lawyer, who in 1624 left England and settled in Massachusetts in a region he called Ma-re Mount (a hill by the sea). This area became an active fur trading site for New England and is where many afflictions/conflicts occurred between himself and the pilgrims (Separatist Puritans) of the Plymouth Community. Morton and William Bradford (the governor of the pilgrims) both made accounts of their lives in Massachusetts. Each of their tales was different from one another's, especially their perspectives of the Indians and religious values.
Some similarities that Henry and Franklin share are they both want to gain independence from New England. They both wanted to be free and have a united society. They both agree that they must speak out against England in order to gain independence like they want.
Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin were similar and different. What makes them similar is the way that they handled politics. They both were willing to anything for the better good, and they both want you to to become more patriotic and have wisdom.
Both men managed to assign each colonist their own task which would support the colony. What they thought of the colonists, however, was very disparate. John Smith believed that he was superior to all of the colonists, and that was why he accredited that he should be the ruling colonist. In John Smith’s book, The Generall Historie of Virginia, Smith expresses rancor on the colonists. In return, the colonists did not cherish Smith at all, and they did whatever they could to take him out of power. His vanity led to a negative relationship with the colonists. On the other hand, Bradford was a transcendent leader of Plymouth, and had a concrete relationship with his people. This led to Bradford being re-elected governor of Plymouth thirty
They both lived in the same time period and helped each other with writings on the colonies freedom. They both wrote persuasive writings. Both had a cause to help free the colonies from England. Beyond that they both wrote amazing writings in their times. One of Thomas Paineś writings was The American Crisis. This writing helped inspire American Troops who were going to battle with England. These two men were the faces of their time. They both wrote to help inspire and influence. In many of Benjamin Franklin's writings, he used pseudonyms but was so well known that people knew it was him who was writing.
To many Europeans in the early 17th century the Americas seemed as a new land of opportunity. John Smith and William Bradford were two of the first men who left England seeking adventure and freedom in the New World. Both groups had difficulties while trying to form their colonies and Smith and Bradford were both elected to lead. While they were both great leaders they had very different lives before their journey from England. While starting their new colonies they also took different approaches to making the land habitable. One of the most notable differences between John Smith and William Bradford was their writing style. John Smith and William Bradford were very different people in
As there are similarities between these two great writers there are also differences. One difference is their cultural background. In 1761, Wheatley came into America as a young slave girl stolen
The first difference between John Smith and William Bradford journals was their writing styles and point of view, since they had different audiences and purposes. John Smith would write about his
When the first American settlement on Roanoke Island was established in 1585 it’s primary force, Sir Walter Raleigh, had no idea that this “New World” would evolve into one of the most powerful voices in the modern world. But before it developed it would have to shaped by it’s founders from the Western world. Two of the largest voices in America’s early development are John Smith, who with a group of English merchants, hoped to get rich in this new land, and William Bradford, a puritan farmer who was one of the most influential men involved with the Mayflower compact. In their two pieces they both convey America as a place to escape but
There are times where you want to have a fresh start in a new place for many different reasons. John Smith and William Bradford were originally from England and came to settle in America and were very successful in their own ways but also had challenges. They both came to the new world for opportunities. William Bradford and his people were trying to look for religious freedom away from England and, they believed in God and predestination. Smith came to Jamestown in Virginia and was looking for land and many riches to make more money and to take back to his home land and, at the time tobacco was a big thing.
John Winthrop and Benjamin Franklin both played pivotal roles in their structuring government, yet were very different in their philosophical views. Winthrop, a Puritan, founded his ideals based on a firm belief in one almighty God. Whereas Franklin, also a believer in a supreme being, founded his ideals on a more scientific ideal. Both men had different visions of government along with a different view of humanity.
John Smith and William Bradford use divine guidance as an explanation for the reasons of