China’s population is 1.3 billion people, which is 18.8% of the world’s population of 7.2 billion people (“United States Census Bureau”). The streets of China are flooded with people, cars, and bikes because of the massive population. Everywhere there are people shoulder to shoulder and cars bumper to bumper. Due to the rapid growth of people, the Chinese government had to pass a one child only law (“China”). In contrast, Australia has a relatively small population especially given the size of its’ land mass. Australia and China are very diverse countries in their government, education system, and recreation.
While Australia and China each are controlled by a form of government, the structure of each are drastically different. The Chinese
…show more content…
The Chinese education system is the largest in the world and always wants the best higher education for the academically gifted. It takes twelve years to complete primary and secondary school. In 1986, an education law was passed stated that 9 years of education was mandatory for Chinese children (“China Education Center”). Only the brightest students are allowed to continue their education at a higher level. Because all Chinese students want the best education, it is difficult to get into high schools. There are a limited amount of students that are admitted into the best high schools which provides them a better opportunity to get into a university. Student have to take college entrance exams to be able to get into universities. Students and their families put great emphasis on the student’s education often resulting in great stress for the student. Depending on the region, children go to school five to six days a week. After school, students spend hours on homework each night; usually two hours for primary students, four hours for middle school students, and four or five hours for high school students (“China”). Depending on the school, the more homework is assigned. In contrast to the Chinese educational system, Australia holds a more relaxed view in their educational goals for students. Australian students wear uniforms to school; the boys are required to wear ties and both boys and girls wear blazers and hats. Students are required to attend school from ages six through fifteen. However, after age fifteen, students have a choice as to if they want to continue their education. Australians have the freedom to choose what higher education path they want to pursue either vocationally or at a university. Each university, or uni as Australians call it, has an area of specialty. Schools do not have a limited amount of students that can attend there but are encouraged to go to the school nearby. “With
China has, for a sustained period of time, been one of Australia's most important trade and economic partners. But this has not always been the case. Since the late 1970s China has moved from a closed, internal focused economy to more of a global market oriented one that plays a major part in other nations economies, like Australia's. Although China is technically a Socialist nation, market capitalism is actively encouraged, much the same as in Australia. In 2010 China became the world's largest exporter, with exports ranging from natural resources to manufactured goods. (CIA-World fact book) Australia's economy, in this sense, differs from that of China's. As Australia is simply too expensive to manufacture goods ("Holden, Ford,
The first obvious difference in the education system between Canada and China is in the subjects that are offered for study. In China, there are two systems for students to choose in
Australia and China adopt very different economic systems in order to cater the best for their society. However, Australia's economic system is more successful than China's and, due to the writer's right-wing value system, will be measured in terms of environmental efficiency, labour and entrepreneurial resource efficiency and the standard of living.
The Chinese and Australia economies have many similarities and differences, including the size of the economies, growth rates, unemployment, inequality, standard of living, environmental issues and the roles the different governments have in influencing and modifying these factors of the economy.
Australia and China both benefit if Australia makes iron ore and resource goods and China makes manufactured goods
With more than 1.3 billion people, China has to think about a solution and find ways to deal with its population explosion. In order to have control over population, in 1970, a policy named China’s One Child Policy was introduced. Mingliang argues that, “China, through the one-child policy, has instituted the most aggressive, comprehensive population policy in the world” (1). This policy limits all families in the Republic of China to have only one child, regardless of the sex: however, within this policy there are some exceptions. It is possible to have two children only if the first child is born with a disability, if parents work in a high risk job, if the couple lives in villages, or if the family is a non- Han, otherwise you are
Australia, as a more advanced and industrialised country, has a more developed education system. This is reflected in the mean years of schooling which is 12.6 for Australia, compared to 7.5 years in Indonesia (2013: Human Development Report). This once again is due to the level of fiscal spending by the government. In Australia, $31.8b is spent on school, vocational and higher education (2015-16 budget) and this makes up 7.3% of total expenditure. The government thus has been able to provide a minimum standard of education, primary and secondary.
China’s One Child policy is a policy that the Chinese government introduced in 1979 to try and solve the problem of overpopulation. The Policy’s main purpose was to make sure that China could support its large population with facilities such as healthcare, education, housing, good jobs and most importantly, food. The aim was to reduce poverty and to improve overall quality of life for the people. China’s one-child policy has led to unintended and negative consequences, such as a diminishing labor force, an aging population, the neglect of basic human rights, and an unbalanced sex ratio gender population. To improve China’s situation, the policy should be reversed.
There has been a long history of China’s one child policy, since it was first introduces in 1979 by a Chinese Leader Deng Xiaoping (Rosenberg n.p). The law was meant to be temporary and used to control the population; however it is still in use today (Rosenberg n.p). When the policy was first enforced, it only
I believe that this individualistic ideal is indeed a consideration in why such a great emphasis is placed on study and academic success both in ancient and modern China. But whilst looking into the topic, I discovered that there was an underlying model of communitarianism with their ethos on study. Chinese people believe that a sound education does not only ensure the future of the individual, but also the future and the development of the family and country on the whole. What this means is the Chinese people believe that that only through study, will China be able to ensure the longevity of its people and nation. The maxim from the Three-Character Scripture (an ancient Chinese writing) states, “if no proper education is given to children, their nature will go bad.” I believe the word “nature” can easily be substituted for the overall health of the future of the nation.
When comparing the communist nation of China with the democratic nation of Australia many differences are apparent. The application of the legislative (law making and modifying function), executive (administrative function) and judiciary (law enforcing and dispute resolving function) is vastly different between the two nations as can see when we compare and contrast the underlying principles of each system of government. Firstly, both nations claim to uphold the concept of the rule of law, although due to corruptive forces surrounding the Chinese court system, this concept is often thwarted and equality before the law is not upheld. Within the constitutions of both nations the basic principles of separation of powers have been applied;
Australia boasts one of the world's most multicultural societies. Therefore, it can be difficult to pinpoint what being "Australian" really is, or to define Australian culture. The best way to approach an analysis of Australian culture may be to compare it with another culture. Chinese culture is equally as complex and diverse as Australian culture, as both countries have a large variety of ethnic groups within their borders. However, in terms of the many aspects of culture such as meaning, language, human activity, lifestyle, works of art, and leisure activities, Australian and Chinese cultures differ from one another. Some of the aspects of culture that differ the most between Australian and Chinese societies include gender, lifestyle, and language.
The Chinese government set up a wide system of primary schools. For the first time in all of China’s history the majority of the population received a complete basic education. Even though the government’s “Great Leap Forward” program didn’t put
In China there are 1.376 billion people, in 1982 they hit 1 billion people. China’s growth rate is 0.87% witch isn’t anywhere near Papua New Guinea or Congo but, in the late 1970s and early 80s Chinese government introduced a one child policy, so if you were caught with more than one child you were fined. This was because the Chinese were worried about population growth. When they dropped the idea in ____ a lot of people wanted a second child, so that would have definitely helped the population growth. In ten years’ time there will be around 1.458 billion people living in china if the population growth stays the same. That’s the most populated country in the world, I wouldn’t be surprised if they brought the one child policy
The differences that exist between the Chinese and American education systems are great and obvious. However, some of these differences don’t play to the strengths of the representative country. American schools allow for greater freedom of movement and choice, while Chinese schools decide the “what”, “where”, and “how” of educational circumstance for the students (Bush, tony, and Qiang Haiyan). These differences in structure should lead to a greater educational standard being held by China, but that isn’t always the case. This paper will examine the differences in education system in the two countries and show that the Chinese system, while