The 100 is the first book in a trilogy by Kass Morgan. It was published in 2013 and the following two books were published in 2014 and 2015 (Day 21 1). The TV show The 100 premiered in 2014, before the second book was published (The 100 TV Series 1). Therefore, one would think that season one would be very similar to the first book, and the same goes for the next two seasons and books. The books would always be published before filming for the next season so the directors could follow the books. However, the books and TV show have more differences than similarities, and those differences are major. One thing that has stayed the same is the overall idea of the plot. Both of science fiction works that take place after a nuclear explosion that …show more content…
The first difference is that the books take place 300 years after the nuclear bombs (The 100 Novel 1), whereas the TV show takes place 97 years after the bombs (The 100 TV Series 1). I find it interesting that the producers and directors decided to change how long after the bombings. Maybe the producers found it more believable for the colony to start to run out of resources after 97 years, instead of 300. However, the similarities and differences I’m more concerned about are the characters in both works, the characters only in the TV show, and the characters only in the books. The main characters that are in both works include: Clarke Griffin, Bellamy Blake, Octavia Blake, Wells Jaha and Chancellor Jaha (Wilken 1-3). Out of those, The Jahas have changed the most. In both works, Wells Jaha is Chancellor Jaha’s son. However, Chancellor Jaha is a lot colder and more callous toward his son in the books. And the biggest difference is their importance in the story in each work. In the book, we find out in the second book that Chancellor Jaha is dead (Day 21 4). In the TV show, not only is Chancellor Jaha no longer the chancellor, but he is well and alive, even three seasons in. Wells …show more content…
However, some of the character’s characteristics have been passed on to characters in the TV show. For example, Glass and Wells are best friends, whereas, Clarke and Wells were best friends in the show. Another example is that Luke sky walked in the book, and in the show, it was Raven to do that. Lastly, Rhodes showed characteristics of a character named Pike, who was just introduced in third season. Both of them have the same mindset and rules like they did on the colony and not very tolerant of Grounders or Earthbounds, or those who go against them. I find the character Glass really interesting and I’m shocked they didn’t include her in the show. She was originally apart of the 100, but managed to escape the dropship before it was sent to earth. The reason for her delinquency was because she had an unauthorized pregnancy with her boyfriend, Luke. However, she did lose the baby. Along with that, when asked who the father was, she lied and said it was Luke’s roommate. Luke did not know any of this or why she was detained. I think that would have been an interesting aspect to add to the show. They eventually get to the ground, and I feel like they have several characteristics that could have been beneficial to the show. Thaila was a short lived character, similar to Finn. She was Clarke’s best friend and soon after getting to earth, died. Clarke and
Aside from her high voice and sarcastic acting, there is not much difference from the novel.
The characters aren't the same in both stories, but they both share common characteristics and can be compared to each other. Some of the things that happen to them are also similar. The first characters that are alike compared were Mrs. Peacock and Emily Brent. They are both older women, wealthy, and think they are superior to others. The next set of characters that share characteristics are Mr. Body and Justice Wargrave. Both characters were the ones who came up with the murder plan and invited everyone to the mansions. They are overall alike in the way that they all received a letter, went to a random island, and had to solve a
Besides sound effects and visuals in a movie, descriptive language in a book, both are usually very similar. Specifically, between the book and the movie Fahrenheit 451, the two share many of the main ideas, but have multiple differences. A couple of the top major differences in the movie are that Clarisse doesn’t die and they omit to tell or mention that there is a war going on. Some similarities are the characters personalities and looks. All of these things have impact on how the movie and book contrast and compare to each other.
Some things are different in the book and movie. Like Sunset Towers and Money in both versions. Sunset towers is luxurious in the book but a bad place to live downtown. The money the will was worth 200 million but in the movie it is worth 20 million. Another difference is that the Wexlers moved to Sunset Towers because they had no money, but in the book they moved because they had money. In the movie Jake Wexler is paying off his debt though they have money in the book. Jake Wexler is a
Moreover, in the book George is shown to really hate Curley, whereas in the movie, George doesn’t seem to like Curley too much but he definitely doesn’t hate him. Apart from these characters, all the others are pretty much very similar in both the book and the movie.
A huge difference between the two is that Hannah is old enough to drive in the movie, but in the book she is only thirteen years old. This change makes her a little more bossy with her personality. One of the biggest changes is that in the movie Grace is not a character, but in the book she has a strong influence on Hannah. There are also only two people that are Hannah's age in the movie, but in the book Hannah meets four people that are her age. One major thing the movie changed is that Hannah starts to have a love life with another person. In the when Hannah returns to her normal world she wakes up in a bed, but in the book when she returns she is standing and closing the
There is a big difference between the book and the series or movie. We did a little research and came out with these differences.
These novels had some differences in plot as well, but not too many. One main difference is that the societies view dead places differently. Waknuk views dead places as a place of the devil in comparison to
The book differed greatly from the movie. Fernand Mondego changed in the book because, In the book Fernand meets Edmond in Merce. Edmond Dantes goes to find the treasure by himself and in the movie he goes with Jacopo. Danglar turns in Edmond to the chief of Prosecutor, but in the movie
The characters are similar; however, they are built entirely different. In the stories you can see that their background shows who they are and what type of person they are. "Won't be here till tomorrow. Seems to me I've got to stay her a while. Anyway, I'm the same man-with or without this" (Foreman
Structure of both, the movie and the book is complex to understand. Now, what happens with characters? Are they pretty similar from each version? An accurate answer would be: “Not entirely”. Some of these features can be because of some actions that are different in both versions. For instance, the scene when Carla Jean, Lewelis’ wife, meets Chigurh. In the movie, this is what they talk:
Well, I'll consider anything. At this moment, I'm not planning to write any more in that series. And as far as that impacts the TV show, amazingly, we got through the entire first season, and we haven't even finished book one. So we've got a long way to go before we would empty out the coffers of the books. That's why I certainly hope it goes on 'cause we've got lots of characters I hope we get to. There are little bits from books two and three that got pulled into the first season. The TV show also allows us to dig deeper into storylines that are in the background of the books. Just an example, we know Abby works in this company in New York and she makes her decision to come back to Chesapeake Shores. But that whole story of her life in New York is a story that we can explore a little bit more. So that's one thing about the TV show that is kind of exciting that it allows us to take a deeper look as opposed to a more superficial look at certain aspects of the book and kind of enrich it. And certainly, as I said before, it goes off
Well, the differences between the book and movie range from small, nitpicky details to important aspects of the book. For one, on assignment day everyone who got a job was supposed to be twelve, but in the movie Doon was seventeen and there were little five year olds running around with jobs. Also another age-related fault in the movie was when they made Looper look like he was forty, not fifteen, and dating Lizzie. Besides age, the movie also cut out important scenes to show just how severe the power outages and supply scarcities were, such as the part when Lina was buying color pencils and Poppy got lost during a blackout. The movie also made Ember look like it had more futuristic things than it should have had.
One difference is the appeal and image of the characters. For example, in the book Andy has blond hair and lives with her boyfriend named Alex Fineman. Later in the story, Alex breaks up with Andy. In contrast, Andy has brown hair in the movie. Also the boyfriend’s name is Nate Cooper, instead of Alex Fineman. Another difference in characters is
The movate is different in the book because show made the murder a genius that want to do it support his family because he dying. While the book it was revenge that he did it for. Rache in the book was key to figure the motivate