Should We Stop Animal Testing Necessary?

To begin with, navs.org tells us that humans differ from animals in various ways, animal models will never be able to accurately recapitulate what happens in the human condition. Due to humans differing animals in various ways, the results aren't always effective. Animals being tested on things that humans and animals differ from in basically just killing animals for no reason. Besides, articles.baltimoresun.com states that 90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing were later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials. As a result, 90 percent of the tests done are ineffective and harmful to humans so there’s no point of doing animal tests. You could save thousands of animals by not doing tests on them. Since animal tests aren’t always effective, people should stop doing them and save the

How would you feel if millions of humans were tested on? Millions of animals are testing on yearly to see if your everyday products are safe for humans. Animal testing happens on mice, rats, dogs, cats, and many other animals. By testing on the animals it causes the animals pain, suffering, distress, harm, and even death. Testing produces on animals needs to be stopped because it causes harm to animals, it's a bad way to see if the produce actually works, and it's unnecessary.

After all, the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry prove that animal testing in drugs used by humans is unreliable. According to the FDA, 92% of drugs tested fail to meet the standards for human use. Animals do not share the same body system or physiological responses as humans, so why test these medication drugs on them? The National Anti-Vivisection Society states that it can be dangerous to apply animal-derived data to humans. Drugs that may be effective in animals may not be safe or effective in humans and vice versa. There are many examples where medications that worked on animals have proven to be dangerous to humans’ health. For example, the antibiotic, penicillin, was ineffective at treating infected rabbits and was toxic to guinea

Experimentation of animals may be horrible. But if they do continue the experimentation of animals than that would have evermore excellent results. First, It means that they do not have to test the experiments on themselves. Second, it goes against the laws of science to test it on humans first. And third, It is easier to test and observe the reaction of a mouse or smaller creature than it is to see on a human. And so for these reasons they should continue the experimentation of animals before humans.

Some people argue against testing because it kills animals. Scientists hold them captive, experiment on them and then they kill them. However, scientists have had a lot of success in finding drugs that work on humans. The medications they have found have saved millions of lives, and we now have many vaccines to prevent people from getting sick and possibly dying. Animal testing should be allowed to continue because it is very beneficial to humans and has saved many lives.

Animal testing should end because its harms the animals, other things can be tested instead of animals, it costs more to test animals, and the results in animals can be different then the results in humans which can be really bad and it can harm humans. It also can cause birth defects to babies who are born and people think it will work on babies because it works on animal babies.

“We know that animals can experience pain and distress in experiments and that this can be severe. The way that animals are bred, transported, housed and handled may also cause suffering.”(RSPCA) Animal testing is an issue that has existed since the early 1900s. Some countries have passed laws to ban the use of animals in cosmetic testing, but the United States has not. This is important because over 100 million animals are tested on each year across the world. “Europe, the world’s largest cosmetic market, Israel and India have already banned animal testing for cosmetics, and the sale or import of newly animal-tested beauty products.”(dosomething.org) Animal testing needs to be banned from the United States.

Since the Victorian Era ‘make-up’ now a commonly used term has evolved for the women of modern civilization. It symbolized a social hierarchy within the Victorian era, a level of class and grace established to disembody the sophisticated ladies form the lower class. The make-up industry today is now open for all types of people, cultures, and genders. Although it has made great human advancements, the cosmetic industry now faces the consequences of their growth due to their inhumane treatment of animals. Whereas it benefits humans, animals should not be used for testing because it causes distress and anguish to the experimental animals, we should not treat them as means to further our own advancements but as another living part in our ecosystem, animal testing violates the rights of animals since they have the power to think, to feel and taking part in an experiment as a tool is not moral towards them.

A big epidemic in testing is that drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe for human consumption. In the 1950s the sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities, was tested on animals prior to its release. There was also the drug Vioxx for arthritis when tested it had positive response on the heart of mice, when the drug was released to humans there were more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market. (Medical Articles and Infographics, 2014)

Animals are different than humans in their genetic makeup, and often don’t mimic the same reactions as a humans cells would when testing products. This is why the majority of these tests result in failure. There has been years of research on other methods that can serve as an alternative to animal testing that have come to be more effective. In recent years, Wyss Institute at Harvard University discovered “organs-on-chips,” where human cells are grown on chips in order to mimic human functions. This method of study was proven to be more effective than animal testing, and is more affordable and safer (www.peta.org). Even though this process is not fully developed, products like these can greatly impact how further drugs are tested, and it also ensures our safety. This is why we should invest on other methods of testing, to decrease costs in research, save wildlife, and make our products safer for us to

Around the world, animal testing has been a controversy for many years. In the cosmetic and medical industry, doctors claim that animal testing is essential for life and solves many issues. Although animal testing may have helped the cosmetics industry and has provided opportunities, this form of experimenting has not been imperative to humanity. Even though animal testing has been helpful, it is no longer necessary due to the development of science, which provides humans with accurate and safer forms of testing that exclude cruelty.

In 2016, 71,370 animals suffered from pain during experiments without anesthesia. Over the years, animals have been tortured or even diseased just to see if a shampoo doesn’t kill you. Would people like it if 50 animals suffered just so that you can use a certain cosmetic product? Society shouldn’t be allowing this hate towards animals. Animal testing should be prohibited because it is cruel and inhumane, there are alternative methods, and animals are genetically different from humans.

Although large companies and those for animal testing might think that animal testing is essential for products to be declared safe for human use, that is entirely untrue. Animals are not humans, so testing is not accurate. They are also genetically modified and subjected to abnormal stress. According to the FDA, only 5-25% of animal tests and human tests agree, so there is little relevance to humans. Furthermore, only 9% of products tested on animals make it to market. This questions how safe the products really are. What is effective in animals isn’t effective for humans. For example, drugs such as Vioxx, Phenactin, and E-Ferol were not effective in 92% of humans. That is

I believe that animal testing within Colorado should be reduced as much as possible. First of all, many people use cosmetic and haircare products and do not realize how many animals had to suffer through testing in order to make that product.Additionally, the 3 animals that are mainly used in these tests are mice,dogs, and cats and that is why I chose this topic. As a child I have 4 small puppies, I have 1 white purrsian cat and I used to have 5 mice. The fact that these animals are being tested on it hit home for me and that is why I feel so passionate about the subject. Of the 3 animals I mentioned 65,000 of them are tested on and only 3% of that 65000 are said to actually survive! That means that out of 65000 animals only 1,950 of them

Do you agree with animal testing? Animal testing has been studied and experimented with for a long time. Many studies and new data have been found from the process of these testing’s. There are different types of animal testing that approach different matters in the world. Some testing’s made on animals are not just for medical reasons, but also for cosmetics. Experiments on animals are performed by scientists who want to further their knowledge on specific topics and procedures. There are many steps into observing an animal and the possible relations between animal and humans. Although there are great benefits to animal testing, many individuals believe that it is a cruel matter towards the animals.