We have decided to get rid of the Articles of Confederation, because it is causing problems throughout the country, by not enforcing any laws or regulations. We are suggesting a new stronger government that can support our growing country, by dividing the power over three branches of government, to avoid becoming like the king we have just escaped from.
The reason we are getting rid of the Articles of Confederations because we don’t have the power to collect taxes without permission, they couldn’t draft men into the army to protect our country from enemies, we couldn’t regulate tariffs, and we went minority instead of majority. These thing are some of the reason we have decided to get rid of the Articles. Along with these reason we have decided that we need a stronger more efficient government that works as a whole and goes with what the majority of the people say,
…show more content…
That is why we got rid of the Articles of Confederation, and that is why we are writing the constitution, to unify us as a whole under not just one branch of government but three so no one has enough power to take over and put us back were we started, when we were still under “our” power hungry king.
We created the three branches of government, so that each branch as a different power, but having them all work together to be able to function themself. Therefore not giving any of the branches enough power to overthrow one another. These branches consist of the Legislative branch, which is separated into two groups, The House of representative, which is in charge of originating spending bills. The we have the Senate, which is in charge of impeaching officials and approving treaties. But all together they have the power to pass laws, which is headed by
The United States left the Articles of Confederation behind for a new more adapted constitution in 1788 due to more than one reason, however a main reason for the switch had to do with the power of the federal government. There would be some Libertarians that would hold the Articles to be the symbol of American freedom at its peak, however there were those that would later be known as Federalists that saw the Articles as a failure due to the lack of strong central government powers within the articles. The many differences between the two documents were each important in there own respect, the first one that come to mind would be the power to levy taxes, under the articles Congress could request that States pay taxes, but under the
While the Articles of Confederation unified the American colonies for the first time, the individual states had a hard time allowing a central government to solely control their territory. Due to fear of an all powerful monarchy like the one they had experienced in England the colonies were wary of allowing a central government certain powers. These certain powers included control of commerce, ability to tax, and even the ability to act directly upon individual citizens of a state. While the Articles provided a loose confederation to unify the new country, they were only a temporary solution due to their obvious weaknesses in several areas. The Articles of Confederation were essentially
The government established by the Articles of Confederation lacked the coherence, strength, and cooperation needed to spur the young nation to success, instead wreaking havoc politically, defensively, and economically. For example, because there was neither a national currency nor regulation of commerce, the mid-1780s were stricken with inflation and economic depression. Moreover, due to the absence of a national legislature, laws varied from state to state; thus, Congress had difficulty passing and enforcing laws and taxes. Lastly, the nation lacked strong, solid leadership to guide decisions and head foreign affairs. In essence, at the time of America’s new-found independence from Britain, the Articles failed to provide a unified government
This may seem like a complete failure however, the Articles illuminated a clearer path to a democracy and that involves a central government. The Articles of Confederation showed that to have a successful democracy you need a strong central
During the era or time in which the Articles of Confederation were in place, the document had a lot of weakness; maybe too many weaknesses. These weaknesses included: It had created a struggling economy, had no Judiciary, only had a legislature (Congress), no executive (President), and gave too much power to the states or the people. A weakness that the Articles had been that the people thought that the government would help with the economy. This caused a struggling economy, and that had a lot of consequences like Continental Army marching against the government for
The Articles of Confederation were written and ratified in 1781 and the first thing it states is, “We the People”. This phrase was written because they were afraid of strong government. This first statement shows that we as a people have to stick together and not become separated by a higher power, being government. We need a strong State Government. We can’t repeat the same thing we revolted and fought for, independence, and a will for a perfect government without an exceeding amount of power. and we can't let the same thing happen again
The Articles of Confederation are weak. They allow each state to be strong, but each state cannot defend itself alone against other countries. All the states need to come together and create a new Constitution that will create a national government to help each other to protect themselves. The national government will not have all the power, like in a unitary system. It will be a federalist government, where the power will be divided between the national government and the states.
The effects of the Articles of Confederation only work in my favor partly. With the Articles of Confederation the government has power but, the Articles of Confederation also give the people power. The government gives the people power; I believe the government should take that power back for the people’s safety. The people have only shown the government they can’t be responsible citizens without a government to guide them. Personally the people should not have so much power. The
The Articles of Confederation was the United State’s first constitution, it was written in an effort to unite the states after the American Revolution and served as a blueprint for the modern constitution. In order for the Articles to become official, they had to be approved by all thirteen colonies. Although Congress sent the Articles of Confederation to the states around the end of 1777 to become ratified, they were not officially adopted until March 1, 1781. Under these Articles, the states remained sovereign and independent, with Congress serving as the last resort on appeal of disputes. The American people feared a strong national government and as a result of this, the Articles of Confederation were specifically designed to be weak in the sense that each state maintains its own sovereignty and all rights to govern themselves, with the except of the rights exclusively granted to Congress. Since the Articles lacked many necessary components to keep a nation properly structured, they were eventually revised into the constitution we recognize today. Although, the Articles of Confederation seemed as though it only contained weaknesses, within the document, many strengths and accomplishments were made. Overall, the Articles of Confederation were proven to be both efficient and non-efficient during the time period they were in effect.
The biggest fault in the Articles of Confederation was that it called for a confederacy, “each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled” (Articles of Confederation, 1777, p.1). This state sovereignty went against republicanism, which is more closely associated with popular sovereignty. The American people want the government’s authority to come from the representatives that they elect. This is easily seen as a crucial idea of the Constitution in its preamble, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union … do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of
The national government of the United States had many challenges under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles caused money problems and the most essential detail, a weak government. This also caused America conflicts among each of the 13 states. These problems greatly impacted the United States and it’s government as well.
Once America was free of British rule, U.S citizens were on their own. They had no form of government to keep them together. The Articles of Confederation were the American’s first attempt at their own government system.
“The Constitution devotes the national domain to union, to justice, to defense, to welfare and to liberty” (Maier 154). This quote, stated by William Henry Seward, displays the strength and stability that the Constitution had over the nation, and the liberty and justice it supplied for all of its citizens. Although the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation have similarities, they have many differences, which proved that the Articles of Confederation were a weaker document in comparison. It can be said that the Articles were the “rough draft” to the final living document, which significantly influenced and “ruled” our government, as it still does today.
The failure of the Articles of Confederation help the founders to create a more stable government system with the Constitution. The flaws in the Articles helped them make changes that made the new system very effective. Under the Constitution, Congress had a right to levy taxes (Feldmeth). This fixed the problem of the government always running short on funds because they could only request taxes from the government. They were also able to raise an army to deal with threats, something they were not able to do under the Articles. States are more evenly represented under the Constitution instead of being
The Articles of Confederation which was ratified in 1781 should not be replaced. The articles kept the states together in a “league of friendship” (O’Connor, Sabato, and Yanus 32). In a government like this, the states would be kept intact and