preview

Should The Government Monitor Internet Activity?

Decent Essays

"Who would have imagined in 1990 that social media and the internet would have such a profound impact on all areas of life: human relationships, domestic and global trade, education, entertainment? Now it is nearly impossible to live outside of the technological empire of Apple, Samsung, Microsoft, Google, or other tech companies. The pervasive nature of technology has influenced the political world as well, involving recent events such as Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, Net Neutrality, or President Trump’s spontaneous and often ridiculous Tweets. The Technological Age has caused a new debate: the government’s role in monitoring internet activity. Constitutional ideals suggest that the federal, state, and local government should monitor the internet activity of its officials, but it should not monitor the activity of its citizens. …show more content…

This is why the government should monitor and regulate its officials’ internet activity. Marbury v. Madison, which occurred shortly after the Constitution’s ratification, established the concept of judicial review, enabling the judicial branch to determine whether the actions of the executive branch are constitutional. In the present, judicial review means that the Supreme Court can hold the executive branch accountable for its actions. The government ought to monitor the internet activity of executive officials, especially the president, to ensure that they consistently adhere to the Constitution’s regulations. This lowers the risk of treasonous, offensive, or inappropriate transactions or statements made by government officials. This, in turn, establishes a balance of powers in the government, so that no branch or official exercises complete control and answers for his or her own

Get Access