Should Students Grade Their Teachers? Essay

The article "What? I failed? But I paid for those credits! Problems of student evaluating faculty" written by Thomas Lord discusses the problems of students taking advantage when providing feedback on a professor's performance. Students use evaluations assessments on teachers to work in their favor in hopes of receiving better grades and easier exams. This left teachers with the issue of reforming their style of teaching to comply to a much lower standard for better reviews or to remain firm with the expectation of their students and their work. Through a demonstration by a young journalism instructor, it appeared to be true that faculty reviews were more about a student's satisfaction than how a teacher could improve his effectiveness in

First of all, continual feedback allows teachers to self-reflect on best practices. For example, a teacher can target his/her areas of weakness in order to grow professionally and gain further insight of best practices. Another benefit, of teacher evaluations is higher student success rates. These, for example, are measurable through district assessments and state standardized assessments. If a teachers success rate has significantly improved through modification of practices, T-TESS has served its intended purpose. Finally, yet another benefit of teacher evaluations is the fact that the educator is an active participant in his/her evaluation process. For example, through goal setting, the educator is allowed the opportunity to decide where he/she want to grow. Through the evaluation cycle and the communication therein, the appraiser and educator both take greater responsibility in understanding and meeting established goals. Finally, at the end of the process, student growth is an indicator of a well-developed and integrated evaluation system. These are but a few of the many benefits reaped from an evaluation systems such as T-TESS (TEA,

There has been a lot of ideas on how students should be graded yet it always seems to be the same. Tests, tests, and more tests. There are so many issues with this due to so many variables. Everyone has a different life and some students do more than others outside of school. Why can’t students be graded based on how they perform on their personality, how much they are involved outside of school, and their home life? Is not everyone different?

Education reform takes on different forms depending on the goals of reformers. However, most will agree their ultimate goal is to positively impact student achievement. Changes in public education continues to increase teacher accountability, as well as, update curriculum standards and standardized tests. The teacher evaluation system is one focus of recent initiatives. While district implement new teacher evaluation methods, skepticism surrounds its effectiveness, in improving teaching, and comprehensiveness, in assessing the multi-faceted role a teacher plays in the lives of students. I have experienced the good, bad, and ugly of the teacher evaluation system of Shelby County.

The argument that's brought up more often then not concerning the subject is the, "wouldn't it be fair" argument. This argument states that students should be able to rate their teachers because it lowers the chance that students will be taken advantage of. It forces teachers and professors alike to perform at the top of their capabilities and provide a fair learning environment for their students. One where the students will be punished for their wrong doings and so will teachers. It keeps things fair

Teachers should still grade homework. If they did not grade homework kids would not do it. Kids would also not learn or remember it as much. Homework also gives us a reminder of what we previously did. Kids would also lose some responsibility.

One reason why kids couldn’t grade teachers is that the school system can’t trust a bunch of middle schoolers to seriously grade their teacher and not make it a joke. Many students would abuse their right, and ask for less homework or more recess, which would hurt the kids trying to actually learn.

Do you think that teachers should make an effort to make sure that other teachers of the same subject are grading/teaching

Across the United States, policymakers determine evaluation systems for public school educators. Used as a tool for increasing teacher effectiveness and accountability, teacher evaluation systems vary from state to state as determined by individual state departments of Education. According to Sergiovanni & Starrat (2002), the role of the evaluation process is important in developing teachers’ instruction, which should contribute to academic achievement of students. Evaluation should provide meaningful feedback to teachers, to improve instructional practices and support learning (Kelley and Maslow, 2012).

A teacher is one of the noblest professions there are. It is also very well one of the most criticized professions there are. If we are talking about a school teacher, then evaluating their effectiveness becomes, sadly, a fairly narrow scale. Because of standardization, the results of students test scores is the primary evaluation of the teacher’s effectiveness. It has also been said that test scores do not equal intelligence, so other more important characteristics

I heard there is a new rule going around that we might be graded by our conduct. In my opinion I don’t think this should be done. I think our grades don’t necessarily go hand to hand with our behavior. These are the reasons I don’t think we should be graded by our behavior.

Parents what if you paid your children for doing well in school? If you paid your kids for getting good grades it will make students actually work harder and listen more if they know they are getting rewarded. Kids should get paid for good grades because, it gives them a chance to understand money and how it works, they can save that money up and won’t have to ask you for money all the time, wouldn’t that be nice, and finally it causes them to do well in school.

I agree with your thinking here; there must be a more effective way to assess teacher effectiveness than based mostly on how students perform on a test. I had not considered that teachers are not seen as true professionals I wonder if that may be a part of the push to use student test scores as an evaluative tool for professionalism. Playing the devil's advocate, I can understand how the general public, who have not stepped into the classroom and experienced the demands of teaching would see a benefit in using the test scores as an evaluative tool. From their worldview and limited knowledge test scores appear to be tangible assessment-if students score high this means the teachers and schools are doing their job. However,

Imagine you are in an important meeting of school education, you are chosen to make the last decision of how should students be graded. Would you choose to be graded on skills or effort? An issue that teachers have is how should students be graded. Many schools all over the world are choosing to be graded on their skills and not effort. Dr. Francis Underwood is an educational expert. He believes that students should be graded on their skills rather than effort. This issue affects the world by grading students with different choices. Some people agree that students should be graded on skills others believe they should be graded on effort. Underwood opinion that students should be graded on their academic skills, rather than effort, is correct because it is hard to grade effort and if students cannot show their skills then they don’t understand.

In America, not enough information is considered when evaluating our educators. Current evaluations involve assessing teacher performance in the classroom and analyzing student performance on standardized tests. To assess teacher performance, a principle takes notes during a sit-in on a teacher 's class. This may only happen once a