For years and years, there have been many cases that police officers use unnecessary force on citizens. Citizens have reported the incidents, taken the incidents to court, and as well as people starting protests because of this. Instead of people feeling safe that the police is around people fear them. There has been a solution that involves police officers now having to be required wear body cameras. The use of body cameras on officers will reduce the use of force and will reduce dishonesty on incident reports; however, officers should not wear body cameras as it is an invasion of their privacy. To start off, police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it will reduce dishonesty on incident reports. For example, the footage of a body camera could reveal the misconduct of what actions the officer committed and officers would look foolish if they decided to file dishonest reports on the incident. This could solve many cases in the future by the use of body cameras and will reduce the amount of complaints by citizens based on what the decision was by the jury and judge. Overall, police officers should wear body cameras because it will reduce dishonesty on incidents as it could reveal the misconduct of the officers actions. …show more content…
To illustrate, in the year 2014 in the state Missouri there was a shooting on an unarmed black teenager and which the case was taken to court; as a result, the jury did not indict the police officer. After the public heard about this, people started to protest across the United States demanding that every police officer needs to be equipped with a body camera. To sum it up, police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it will reduce the use of force such as an officer did in a shooting in Missouri killing an unarmed
There are people who think those police officers should wear their body cameras. Police officers need to wear their body camera for protection. People who are for it want the best for police officers. They do not want to see the officers suffering from rumors. For instance, a police officer could be in a situation that he or she has to excessive force on the suspect.
There are three main points supporters argue in this debate of why police should be mandated to wear body cameras. First, supporters state that police body cameras can help solve police brutality. The first police department in the United States to implement police body cameras was in Rialto, California, and according to Al Jazeera America, "The department saw an 88 percent decline in complaints against officers and use of force incidents plummeted to 60 percent" (Demetrius and Okwu 2). These supporters think if we were to implement police body cameras for all police departments in the United States, then these effects on police brutality could be attained nationwide. Second, supporters believe that body cameras will punish corrupt police
ATMS, cell phones, factories, parking lots, gas stations, supermarkets, and etc. all have cameras, however they do not catch everything. For instance the reality of what happened during the period of Ferguson. Police officers requiring to utilise body cameras should be a necessity. Everyday people are being examined at their profession by cameras. So why cannot police officers wear body cameras? The fact is they can and it will help in a decrease of deaths, crimes, unlawfully convicted people, and more. Body cameras need to be required on police
In the past couple years the media has been focusing a lot of its attention on police officers. Sadly they make police officers out to be horrible people who act solely on their hatred for certain races, but in reality police officers are there for the safety of the citizens. In any profession there will be people who are there for the wrong reasons, and this is true for police officers as well. Although most police officers focus on the safety and wellbeing of the citizens, some police officers are in for their own selfish and personal reasons. As a result they act immoral and unethical. These are what the media calls bad cops. Because of the misconduct of a few police officers, the public now proposes police officers wear body cameras. The use of body cameras proves to be a valuable asset in the incrimination of justice because of its many benefits, few downsides, and overall public approval.
The topic of police wearing body cameras has been heavily debated over recently, but the major spike in discussion occurred approximately a year ago, with the fatal shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed African-American eighteen year old in Ferguson, Missouri. There have been other shootings this past year, and many people have become outraged with the way police abuse their power and use excessive force, and now all those protesters want one thing: for all police to wear body cameras. I for one agree with them, it should be mandatory that police wear body cameras while on duty.
“We’re not anti-police, we’re anti-police brutality,” said Al Sharpton. It has to be understood that people fighting for justice are not against the police, they are against police brutality. Many cases that involve police using excessive force on civilians are occurring. There is not evidence being recorded because either officers do not have their body cameras or they are not turning them on. Innocent police officers and also innocent civilians are being charged guilty without proof of what actually happened in the encounter. Some officers are using their authority to pin everything on the civilian by using fake eyewitnesses and testimonies. Because of this, the public is having a hard time trusting authorities. It should be mandatory for police officers to have body cameras because it eliminates chances of them using excessive force, clears the confusion, and helps gain the public’s trust in them.
Police brutality has become a major issue in the United States causing people to believe that officers do not protect and serve. There has been many questions of how we can solve this problem. One of the many questions people ask is “Should all police officers wear body cameras?” By police officers wearing body cameras it can make poor communities become safer and help communities have trust with the police. Also, body cameras can protect police officer when they get into bad confrontation.
Police officers should wear body cameras because it will decrease hostility. Body cameras will help to encourage civilians to be less abusive if they are stopped by a cop for any reason. “Everyone is on their best behavior when cameras are running (Ron miller, chief of police, Topeka, Kansas police Department). For example, Keith Scott was shot by the police in North Carolina because the police said he had a gun. However, his wife and other people said he had a book, not a gun. If the police had been wearing body cameras it would have brought up the truth about the
Police should be required to wear body cams because sometimes or often the police and/or the suspect would lie about the crime that happened. Police may lie about the crime because they don’t want to get in trouble because of something that they did wrong. Also the suspect may be telling the truth and the police is just
This is an important debate to many people, because it can change crime rates and rate of police brutality dramatically. If a police officer is wearing a body camera it could save their life because the offender will know they are being watched and probably won’t try to attack the officer. As with any positives, there are negatives, like the expence of the cameras per officer as large. Also, don 't forget that they are an invasion of privacy.
Police officers should have to be required to wear body cameras to ensure the safety of the citizens and to provide evidence for a court case. Many times the police have gotten away with too many things and commit crimes that go unnoticed It’s time we put a stop to that and we make a change. With the use of body cameras that police force would be more trustworthy, they wouldn’t commit crimes, and they would be able to supply the court with undisputable evidence.
Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give
First, police officers should be required to wear body cameras because of increased police brutality. According to several websites, police brutality has gone up 25% since 2001.That number is staggering considering the number of violent crimes dropped 4% in the past year alone, bringing the number of crimes to the lowest it's been in forty years. Some people claim that police brutality hasn't gone up, and the media just started covering it more. Those claims, however, become smothered by hard facts. Some people just can’t seem to face the truth. The media must be covering more because of more frequent occurances.
Police officers should wear body cameras at all times on duty because it creates more evidence. Body cameras document everything from witnesses,victims,and suspects. “Perceived benefits that body-worn cameras offer—capturing a video recording of critical incidents and encounters with the public, strengthening police accountability, and providing a valuable new type of evidence—largely outweigh the potential drawbacks. (Ziv). This supports the argument because body cameras will be able to record any incidents and report them with the public. This quote support my big argument because only the officers and the victims knows what going on in a situation. This quote supports the position because now there will be clear evidence in certain
I believe that Police Officers should always be required to wear Body Cameras. The reason i believe that Police should wear Body cameras is because for months and months on end there have been multiple case's of Police killing innocent civilians for unnecessary following the shooting death of unarmed black teenager in Ferguson,Missouri, in August 24 2014. The grand jury's decision was to not indict the officer of the shooting of the unarmed black teenager. Because of that happening the people began to riot in the streets because the police officer was not charged with anything after he had murdered a unarmed black teenager so in order for these riot's to be stopped community leaders suggested Police Officers should always have body camera's on them while they are doing their daily duties just in case another conflict happens between the officer and another person. Our former president of the united states was also informed that this situation was occurring through out different states so had funded a lot of money into help state's and local police departments so they would be able to purchase these body cameras and for new police training just to improve the police community.