Should Creationism Be Taught In Public Schools Essay

Throughout the class discussion I found it appalling that around 15% of my classmates were believers in Creationism. Whether their beliefs were due to religion, or a lack of schooling in biology an underlying factor such

Creationism has long been ruled out of public education and science. Creationists reject most of modern science in favor of a literal reading of the Bible. They believe that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old and God created everything fully formed (including humans). People in opposition against Intelligent Design think that in the eyes of creationists, the so called “intelligent designer” is God. Meanwhile, Darwin's Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor. Once Darwin had proposed that the natural processes could have produced every species on this planet, including humans, the creationists felt that this theory took God out of the picture. Centuries later, like many people in Dover, many people in the US agree. Somewhere between a third and half the US population doesn’t accept

In the United States, the theory of evolution and creationism has been strictly debated as far as which method if any should be taught in science classes across the globe. How was the earth created? Where did humans come from? These are questions that arise in most science classes. Many students require an explanation to why humans exist. There are those who would oppose evolution, and there are those who oppose creationism. Is there a significant difference between these methods? Several states have passed regulations that allow schools to teach both methods. The Louisiana Science Education Act, in particular, is an extremely controversial debate. The act allows teachers to teach adscititious materials in the classroom. Many opponents are looking to repeal this law. The Louisiana Science Education Act should not be repealed as it allows the student to engage in critical thinking skills, acknowledge both theories and ultimately decide which theory they believe in.

Thesis: It is patently absurd to argue that creationism and / or intelligent design deserve a place in public school textbooks in the "science" chapter or in any way near to the chapter on evolution. The United States Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and freedom of expression, so all faiths and denominations have the absolute right to worship and believe as they

I think if science continues to advance, there will never be peace between it, and creationism. I believe so because it will continually defy each other and never become something that can be taught together and make sense. I also believe that the tax-payers should be the ones to make the decision of what curriculum should be taught in schools. Their money is being sent to these schools and many of them send their children to them. Therefore, I feel they should have a say in what their children should be taught outside of their

The question as to whether or not creationism should be taught in public schools is a very emotional and complex question. It can be looked at from several different angles, its validity being one of them. Despite the lack of evidence to support the fundamentalist idea of creationism, that in itself is not enough to warrant its exclusion from the curriculum of public schools in the United States. The question is far more involved and complex.

Creationism is a religious based theory that God created heaven and earth in six days, created man in his own image, and on the seventh day he rested. If this theory is true, that would be quite an accomplishment. This could be the reason why people that believe in creationism believe that God is all powerful. Yet, God is the reason that creationism is not allowed to be taught in public schools. The First Amendment to the

I believe that the state should not tell people what to believe. Everyone has their own mind and they have the right to believe what they want to believe. I see nothing wrong with teachers teaching about Darwinism or Creationism. I think that everyone should be educated on both matters. There is nothing wrong with knowing information about both subjects, and believing or not believing in them. It is the job of teachers to educate the students on people’s ideas and findings from their research. Once a teacher is telling students what they should or shouldn't do then it is a problem. In the movie, Inherit the Wind, there are many instances where I believe that Bert Cates should not have been found guilty for educating his students on the

One of the major conflicts in creationism is the teaching of a set religion as well. People argue that creationism should not be taught in public schools because it includes Christianity. However, creationism can be taught in schools with as much validity as evolution without including religion at all. It is true the theory leads to a creator, but it

Despite great efforts to convince the opposing side, a battle still brews amongst creationists and evolutionists over the beginning of life and the universe, but neither opinions’ palpability can be firmly upheld through scientific manners. Since science can only prove hypotheses that are testable and based on current observations, neither creation nor evolutionary concepts can be proven with irrefutable evidence. However, regardless of the inability to prove either concept, most public school systems promote evolution as a scientific fact. Many students who lack firm beliefs about the origin of life believe what they are taught without giving any personal thought to the matter. Instead of robotically absorbing biased information,

Evolution has been taught in all public schools for as long as many can recall. Though the process of evolution is not the only theory, schools have been teaching it as if it is the complete truth, ignoring other aspects and only focusing and targeting on Darwin's theory of Evolution. However, there are still many other ideas that the students should be informed of as well because all are theories, all are hypothetic. Teaching of the evolution theory have yet to be proven reliable and confirmed by all scientists, thus it should not be taught in schools and should be left for students to wonder and discover by themselves.

The theory of evolution was created by Charles Darwin. It is the theory that everything was made by the Big Bang and so, life began. From there, life began to evolve. Charles Darwin also believes that we humans evolved from homo sapiens, which are apes. Intelligent design and creationism are the opposite of the theory of evolution. They are the theory that life and everything along with it, was created by a higher intelligence(Intelligent Design Network). Half of all Americans believe in creationism, but U.S courts still rule against teaching creationism in school(Adler). How is that fair if Darwinians are allowed to teach the theory of evolution in school? It goes against many religions and should not be allowed to be taught at schools, just as creationism is not allowed to be taught at schools. The theory of evolution should not be taught at public schools because it is a matter of religion, it is

This shows that the theory is shaky and the theory that the education system rely on is solely based on opinion. As what happened before and after they set to rely their beliefs on the evolution theory, the opinion of the scientific community with regard to theories has a great propensity to change with time. An American molecular biologist, Wells (2009) said that “Darwinism is false, it persists in spite of the evidence, and the eagerness of Darwin and his followers to defend it with theological arguments about creation and design suggests that its persistence has nothing to do with science at all.” Even the science community have doubts and criticism, so why wouldn’t the education system let the students to be informed and balanced by the appearance of two controversial theory rather than only one. Maybe the educators need some support from the community that have their children at

In an article published in the New York times, by Laurie Goodstein, she revealed that a poll conducted by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, revealed that 64 percent said they were open to the idea of teaching creationism in addition to evolution, while 38 percent favored replacing evolution with creationism. It is important to note by this poll that the idea of teaching our children other theories of how this world was created was supported by more than half of the polled population. It needs to be understood that when these teachings are given the opportunity to be introduced in the public school settings, teachers must maintain a very bias approach as to not sway their students into believing one side or the other but, rather let them decide for themselves through research and study what they will believe in.

When Charles Darwin first explained the theory of evolution 143 years ago, the scientists of the time wouldn’t accept it as the truth. The amount of evidence that has proven the theory outweighs any evidence of creationism, from palaeontology, genetics and zoology. But sadly in the 21st century, we are the most scientifically advanced race we know of but people still believe in creationism. If 200,000 people can say they are Jedi or followers of the flying spaghetti monster, which is actually a real religion. Any person in this room can create a religion if they want. We can barely call the theory of evolution a theory anymore, the evidence is too abundant because