Should Art Education Be Funded In Public Schools

Among each State California has the sturdiest policy when it comes to Art Education. The State has severally cut the arts education for Schools in areas particular which serve children from low-income families. The curriculum has and already hard standard for the students to work up to and the already cut from the budget are rarely reestablished. Some school districts do not have much meat left to cut from arts programs that had already been reduced to bare bones after repeated funding shortfalls over many years.

How would you feel if one of your favorite subjects was cut from school? You would feel disappointed or sad right? That is how I would feel if fine arts programs were cut from my school. For me, the arts are an outlet of my soul where I can explore my passion, and express my creativity. There are some school officials that say cutting arts funding would save money that could go towards better funding, but some neuroscientists say cutting arts funding might be a bad idea, since the arts have some very important benefits such as, improved motor skills and better language development. Also with cut funding, we would have more unemployed workers since all the teachers who taught those programs would be laid off and would lose their jobs. There are many disadvantages and advantages of cutting the arts, but I believe fine arts programs should not be cut from schools.

Greek philosopher Aristotle defines the arts ¨as the realization in external form of a true idea, and is traced back to that natural love of imitation which characterizes humans, and to the pleasure which we feel in recognizing likenesses.¨(IEP). The fine arts which have been a part of human history for 30,000 years have played an essential role in the development and advancement of our societies. As of today, the fine arts are facing the danger of vanishing in the education system of the United States Schools in places like Minnesota, Michigan and Philadelphia struggle to obtain arts programs within their schools. Districts like the Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan district, have been struggling with raising student’s academic scores in courses

Art is a subject that lets kids be creative and use their imagination or skill. Art is a subject that only a few are truly talented at it. Therefore, why make kids that are not going to be successful at it take it. It should be a choice not so much a mandatory class. The state board of education should not add art to the high school curriculum, but rather as an elective.

Lets paint a picture together. Blank walls, silent rooms, and shy students are what is brushed on the canvas. Our picture is a result of the limitations put on the powers of artistry. Staci Maiers validates that “the school play, the marching band, the drama club, the student art show - they’re usually highlights of a student’s education” (1). “. . . [Fine Arts] can connect people more deeply to the world and open them to new ways of seeing, creating the foundation to forge social bonds and community cohesion,” (qtd in Smith 2). Maiers expresses, “Because fine arts education typically is not considered core curriculum or included on high-stakes standardized test mandated by federal requirements, music, art, theater, and dance usually

Since the nation issued financial cuts, Fine Arts programs have been reduced or completely abolished. This reduction instigates the controversy on how to deal with prioritizing funding from the federal government. Students, parents, teachers, taxpayers, schools, and the federal government are all directly involved in this controversy. People that value arts education tend to be more anxious about the possible outcomes. The stakeholders are divided on whether or not the fine arts should be funded in schools. Stakeholders worried about their non-fine arts programs want the funding priority to be in their favor. However, people associated with fine arts want to see funding in their programs. Pro-Fine arts education stakeholders mostly point to the values of the outcomes that derive from the arts as their prime support for their argument.

Fine arts are one of the first things that get cut when school budgets are getting tight. Administrators even question why we have a fine arts program if it’s not beneficial to the curriculum. You need fine arts to improve creativity and mindset for whatever you may want to do, and help kids see a way to have a place to belong and get in where they may feel left out or otherwise rejected. Research shows that low poverty areas that have fine arts programs keep kids occupied and out of trouble. Fine arts should be kept in schools because it keeps kids out of trouble, improved school results, and the outcome of fine arts involvement.

Personally I think that the art schould be taught in public schools. The art is surrounding us from every side. The art is helping many people to assimilate knowledge. For example pictures connect the explanations of mathematics with the equations. Images are also helping learn history. Thanks to that what they are showing we can get to know the past and events which changed the life of our ancestors. The music similarly to images is developing the logical thinking. The art is combining with school subjects. Therefore pupils should at school only to listen to the teacher and read, but also enter a role of authors. They schould get to know the smell of paints and clays, the effort of writing pieces, or playing the instruments. Classes in which

Curiosity seems to be one of the greatest assists possessed by human kind, there seldom seems to be a child who doesn't ask the question "why?" frequently, but so often school as the innate ability to limit children's curiosity. Public education tends to be overlooked, most people don't see it for what it is, a way of nourishing and expanding the developing minds of youth, and a way of passing down culture and traditions. The education children receive is a toolkit to help them solve problems later in life, but the majority of the time students do not obtain the well-rounded education they need to prosper. Due to a multitude of different reasons, mostly attributed to budget, art programs are being cut out of curriculum. The reduction of budget

The fine arts are a very important aspect in everyday life. The building you are sitting in, the music you listen to, and even the car you drive were created by some sort of artist. When school districts begin to cut art classes, they are taking away the opportunity for kids to become interested in these arts. If children don’t become acquainted with fine arts, then most likely none will go into that job field. The fine arts are essential for a developing brain and essential for everyday life. Cutting art and music classes will be detrimental to the youth today because it is necessary for a well-rounded education.

“It has become a mantra in education that No Child Left Behind, with its pressure to raise test scores, has reduced classroom time devoted to the arts.” This

Many students believe classes in the arts are an experience for every student . Art class is not required at John I. Burton unless the students do not join Spanish class. John I. Burton does not have any classes in the arts that are required other than art, which is still up to the student to accept or not. The courses in the arts classes should not be a required in school whereas electives are not necessary for everyone to take, and classes in the arts are no exception. School already has the required classes for the students to take and they are . Especially if the students are going for an advanced diploma. I believe classes in the arts should not be required because students are already busy enough, not everyone enjoys them, and there are enough required classes in high school.

Music, dance, drama, painting and drawing teachers try to incorporate academic lessons into their art classes. Students can be learning both art and academic topics at the same time. This can benefit the students extremely because it will not only engage the students in helpful activities, but it will keep them interested in learning the different topics. For example, schools may play music in the halls to introduce the students to culture that may help them to be open to learning new things in all of their classes. The painting teacher may have her student’s paint a picture of a historical event they learned about in their history class and discuss it in front of the class. The music teacher may ask the students to pick a certain song that reminds them of a book they read in their English class and explain to the class why the song reminds them of that certain book. The dance teacher might assign a dance to the students that will get them thinking of a subject to write their paper on for writing class. The possibilities are endless as to how to mix academics into the arts. It is important to do so to keep the creative juices flowing in the young minds of the students in public schools. By participating in an arts course, students are fueling their cognitive developments and are

Located on the Americans for the Arts main webpage are featured access points such as its public awareness campaign, facts about effects art education has on students, success stories and testimonials from those who lead better lives because of the arts, ways to get involved in the effort, and government policies that have been put into action concerning the deterioration of arts in public schools. A letter posted on the website, written by President George W. Bush, to the first joint meeting of the National Assembly of State Arts Agencies and Americans for the Arts, states the following:

“Art, while being an incredible asset in developing minds, is not prioritized in public schooling, and alternate options aren’t necessarily widely known or affordable” (Furster). Why is it important to improve the art programs in the school? Art Programs or not, Rory Pullens, The District arts director for the Los Angeles Unified School District, enlightens the idea. “When you look at the disparity between those schools that were ranked exemplary with A’s and those schools that were C’s and D’s, it was staggering to see that in a district of this size only 35 schools were ranked as an A in the arts, given all this criteria” (Torres). In many cases, Art is the first thing that schools cut from the budget. Many students in the country do not have access to art, and in the state of California, that is a violation of state law. Art is a phenomenal asset that develops minds. It’s not always the school’s fault. The art program is considered more of an option to school districts, which results in a lot of people not having the ability to access art classes. School Districts should consider avoiding cutting the art programs from their budgets because separate institutions are expensive, VAPA (Visual And Performing Arts) Programs are required by law in some states, and the reason communities are so eager to cut art programs.