preview

Seeget And Larraga Case Summary

Good Essays

Larraga then started conversing with Mr. Seeget and Larraga could smell alcohol and it appeared Mr. Seeget was intoxicated. During this time Larraga did not see Hamilton in the work area and Larraga did not call for Hamilton to respond for the investigation. While Mr. Seeget was seated in the chair and waiting for Hamilton to arrive, Corporal Jesus Garcia did not have any interaction with Mr. Seeget. Larraga believes that a supervisor called Hamilton to assist because Hamilton arrived approximately five to ten minutes later. Once Hamilton arrived, Larraga did not see any conversation between Tucker and Hamilton. Larraga did not recall if Mr. Seeget told Hamilton that he was the son of an LAPD officer when he started his investigation. Hamilton then attempted to conduct field sobriety tests while Larraga was assisting. Larraga did not recall Mr. Seeget’s attitude or performance during the attempted tests. At some point later during the investigation, Larraga was told by another officer that Mr. Seeget was the son of an LAPD …show more content…

Seeget’s vehicle storage after PEO Graham completed the CHP form 180 and provided it for approval. Garcia was asked to review the form for this interview and he noted that by looking at the form he believes Hamilton was the arresting officer and Graham completed the form. After Mr. Seeget’s arrest, Garcia did not approve the arrest report but Garcia did approve Tucker’s supplemental report. Garcia was not subpoenaed to appear at the DMV hearing and he did not receive any request to produce documents or evidence. Garcia did not testify at the DMV hearing but Garcia testified at the criminal DUI trial. Garcia believes that if he was requested to produce documents under a subpoena that it would be fulfilled by Records. Garcia noted that Records also sends out notices regarding the storage of vehicles and the Traffic Bureau or its employees are not involved. SUMMARY OF INTERVIEW WITH LIEUTENANT CHRISTIAN

Get Access