Australia is the smallest continent however 6th largest country. Australia has a population of approximately 20 million people and we spend approximately 13 million dollars on the Security and Defence of our country. Whilst The United States of America has a larger population of approximately 300 million people and spends excessive amounts in the tune of approximately 400 billion to secure the Safety of its country. When is comes to labeling the Defence and Security of countries around the world America is know as having the world’s only “Superpower” whilst Australia is known as “Middle Power” when is comes to defence resources and military reinforcements.
Description of the Links and Treaties
A treaty was initially established in San Francisco in 1951 however it came into force on the 29 April 1952 between Australia, New Zealand and the United States of America, which is referred to as the ANZUS Treaty. This was created to reinforce Australia and New Zealand’s National Security and increase Australia’s ability to protect itself and its interests. Since the Treaty the defence interactions have always remained solid with Australia however interactions with New Zealand had change in 1985 when New Zealand refused access to the USA to use its ports with nuclear weapons and the USA suspending its Treaty
…show more content…
Throughout the years the Treaty has existed the alliance has been questioned, “In the 2005 Australia and United States at Ministerial Consultations, both sides emphatically affirmed the enduring significance and relevance of the alliance and its firm basis in shared values, interests and sacrifice”. The alliance is very important as it provides Australia with access to world leading defence hardware and technologies without this Australia could become very vulnerable to security
Another major aspect this limb deals with is that of Australia’s relationship with the United Nations and other major international organisations .
Australia’s presence in the ANZUS and SEATO alliances has been very important in our past. The ANZUS agreement which involved Australia, New Zealand and The United States said that they would “*come to one another’s aid in the event of an attack*” (Retro Active 2 p166 paragraph 1). This was formed in 1951. The SEATO alliance (South-East Asia Collective Defense Treaty), which was the one our involvement in Vietnam was based around involved Australia, Britain, United States, France and New Zealand. They all agreed that they would help protect Laos, Cambodia,
Though Australia is a powerful country and is considered a main player in the surrounding area yet it is does not hold a primary rank in the global environment. Australia's contribution in military interventions beyond the Asia Pacific is smaller and follows the lead of another country such as the United States. The Australian Defense Force (ADF) has the capability to tackle with the crises in its neighborhood, because of emergence of security concerns constantly from Indonesia and many other smaller states. Australia has adopted a strategy to support and strengthen the presence of United States in the region. This mutual cooperation is very important for Australia as regards economy and security. Its alliance with United States has been due to many reasons.
These alliances included Australia’s close relationship with the US and the SEATO treaty in which Australia signed in 1965 with countries in the South East Asian region that haven’t fallen under the influence of communism, which includes; New Zealand, Australia, the Philippines, Thailand and Pakistan, as well as USA, Britain and France. This treaty was formed so that each member would come to the member’s aid if they were ever attacked by communist troops. Therefore, Menzies sent troops to fight in Vietnam due to our close relationship with the United States and helping them whenever there needed help, as well as, fighting against the communist in countries that were being
The ANZUS treaty (Australian, New Zealand United States) was an agreement signed by all three treaties in 1951 to protect the pacific if another attacks like the Japanese were to occur. This treaty was very important for Australia's defence, as in WW2 the Japanese almost invaded Australia but the United States saved Australia from being invaded. Australia was willing to send troops to support America because Australian politicians believed if they helped now the US would help if Australia were ever to be attacked as this idea is shown in Allan Renouf’s letter; “To achieve such a habitual closeness of relations with the United states and sense of mutual alliance that in our time and need, after we have shown all reasonable restraint and good sense, the United States would have little option but to respond as we would want.” In 1954 the SEATO treaty was signed to block further communism in SEA. This treaty was used by the United States to keep fighting and to gain further support from other Southeast Asian countries and Australia as SEATO was like a Tiger without teeth this shown in this quote by Diplomat Sir James Cable; "a fig leaf for the nakedness of American
During the Cold War Australia’s culture had been renewed by the many American troops that came to Australia. This factor influenced and strengthened Australia’s bond with the US. Similarly, during the Cold War Australia and New Zealand were geographically isolated meaning both countries were in need of support, at the same time the US needed help with the financial burden of the war. This meant both nations would benefit each other during this certain period. Also Australia as a whole wanted to guarantee the Americans support in the future. The Prime Minister at the time thought that by supporting the Americans, Australia would have stronger ties with the US, on the economic, political and military fronts. This played a vital role in impacting Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam
The US-Australian alliance requires some explanation. At its basis, it pertains to the ANZUS treaty signed between Australia, New Zealand, and the
Bipartisan support for the deepening security relationship is an important factor in its growth. Despite several changes of ruling party or prime minister in each country between 2007 and 2014, the two Governments have maintained a strong commitment to the high-level security relationship.13 The relationship in 2015 is extremely strong, demonstrated by a recent defence technology treaty and discussion of potential Australian acquisition of a Japanese submarine, with strong personal ties between national
In this essay I will be talking about the impact of the fall of Singapore on Australia’s immediate security, and also be giving a brief background of important events during that time.
Australia 's US alliance is unquestionably its single most important security relationship. The security relationship between Australia and the U.S. was sealed with the introduction of the Australia New Zealand United States treaty (ANZUS) which was signed in 1951 (Taylor, 2016). The ANZUS treaty was instigated by the three nations to protect the security of the Pacific. Although New Zealand no longer holds security ties with U.S., the treaty is still in place and was the first of many formal alliances between Australia and the U.S. (Taylor, 2016).
The major event resulting in the USA becoming such a prominent figure relationship-wise to Australia is what is known as the Battle of the Coral Sea. In May 1942 Japan’s naval force tried to take Port Moresby, the last line of defence before Australia itself. However the United States naval force in conjunction with the Australian ships, Australia and Hobart, forced the
The ANZUS treaty provided Australia with a “protector” especially from communism as it states in article 4 of the ANZUS treaty, “Each Party recognizes that an armed attack in the Pacific Area on any of the Parties would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional processes.” This clearly states that if Australia or New Zealand, being in the Pacific were attacked the United States would come to their aid.
An additional advantage of aid is that it provides Australia with strengthened diplomatic, economic and political ties to the recipient countries. As Australia is a prominent aid donor in the Asia-Pacific region, it has strong diplomatic ties with the developing countries of that area, and can therefore receive the benefits from such a relationship with these countries. An example of such a relationship would be the free trade agreements Australia signed with Singapore in 2003 and Thailand in 2005, Australia diplomatic relationship with these nations played a large role in the securing of these two agreements. Australia can also benefit from such a good relationship politically as the recipient country of Australian aid can support Australia’s politics. A strong relationship with a recipient nation would also allow Australia to form economic bonds with the developing country, such as the agreement of tied aid money – were the recipient must spend some of the aid money provided by Australia on Australia’s goods and services, therefore strengthening Australia’s economy. Hence, creating and maintaining strong relationships with recipient nations of Australian aid is advantages as it
The Cold War era (1945-1989) was conflicted with the dominance of, overall, the two superpowers, the U.S.S.R and the U.S, with political and social ideology taking centre stage. Australia's involvement during this time, was paramount and reinstated its long term allegiance with the United States when entering South Vietnam. After WWII had finished, the Soviet Union showed aggression towards the U.S as the competition for world superiority began, and led to the capitalist/democratic nations particularly aligned with the United States fearing the spread of communism. Countries including Australia signed treaties and agreements to stop this regime and the only resolution, in the end, was war.Q
The foreign, military and economic policies of states, the intersections of these policies in areas of change or dispute, and the general structure of relations which they create, are all analysed in terms of aspirations to achieve national and/or international security. Security is most commonly associated with the alleviation of threats to cherished values (Williams; 2008). However this is a definition that is undesirably vague and a reflection of the inherent nature of security as an ‘essentially contested concept’ (Gallie; 1962). Security in the modern day context has many key concepts associated with it: uncertainty, war, terrorism, genocide and mass killing, ethnic conflict, coercion,