Corey Turner’s article describes how a fairly new Securities and Exchange Commission rule puts minority business owners at a disadvantage. The rule, which makes paying for finder’s services against the law, puts minority and small business owners at a disadvantage by preventing the use of finders to connect to investors, partners, and new customer groups. Finders are middle men in business transactions that help to facilitate and connect businesses and their operations. Finders are known to be an important impetus for businesses, especially small businesses and start-ups, who lack the resources and connections to find investors and assets for the business. However, finders do not work for free. Many of which are businessmen and businesswomen themselves, finders get compensated for their help by collecting fees, what we all know as finder’s fees. Thus, the SEC making finder’s fees …show more content…
Since its enabling act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the SEC has passed numerous rules and regulations that impact business. Many of these have been very beneficial in protecting consumers, business owners, and organizations. The SEC’s stance may seem to be counterproductive to helping businesses, but they are doing so to keep them protected. The SEC takes issue with finders and finders fees because some finders may charge extremely high fees and also use their connections to leverage the businesses that are in need of help. The SEC does allow some finder services to be provided, but only by licensed broker-dealers. Broker-dealers however must go through a lengthy licensing process in addition to paying yearly brokerage fees. The SEC has to walk this fine-line between hindering finders with too much red-tape or loosening their stance and exposing business owner’s to corrupt practices that can easily be adopted by
Overview of the Case: The Securities and Exchange Commission claims Mark D. Begelman misused proprietary information regarding the merger of Bluegreen Corporation with BFC Financial Corporation. Mr. Begelman allegedly learned of the acquisition through a network of professional connections known as the World Presidents’ Organization (Maglich). Members of this organization freely share non-public business information with other members in confidence; however, Mr. Begelman allegedly did not abide by the organization’s mandate of secrecy and leveraged private information into a lucrative security transaction. As stated in the summary of the case by the SEC, “Mark D. Begelman, a member of the World Presidents’ Organization (“WPO”), abused
“Instead, prior research claims to show that younger, nonminority consumers with relatively high incomes and educational levels are more likely to take advantage of services from third-party agencies, like the BBB” (Garret & Toumanoff, 2010, p. 3). Therefore, the organization created, Council of the BBB (CBBB), changed point system to eliminate points awarded for accreditation, streamlined its processes for receiving complaints, implemented additional procedures for investigating complaints, begun a thorough investigation into its Los Angeles bureau, agreed to review its processes into accrediting businesses, and instituted a procedure requiring an independent third party to help in the review process. Hopefully, these changes will give this organization the ability to regain its reputation with consumers. Since this organization is mainly funded by businesses and accredited membership, one should be confused as to whether these standards will be adhered to by BBB
Accreditation provides a competitive advantage in the health care industry and strengthens community confidence in safety of care and treatment. Accredited hospitals provide higher quality of care to patients. It improves risk management and risk reduction and helps in organizing and strengthens patient safety efforts. It enhances recruitment and staff education and provides education on god practices to improve healthcare operations. The paper discusses how The Joint Commission assists in having better outcomes in terms of safety in Western Medical Center Hospital. In today’s society, every health care organization should provide a proof of accreditation and are subject to a three-year accreditation cycle. The Commission develops performance standards that address some of the important elements of operation, such as patient care, infection control, medication safety, and patient rights.
1. The SEC is often called the “watchdog” of corporate America. How does it assist in preventing fraud?
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was passed by congress to strengthen the government’s control of the financial markets. It was preceded by the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 which was enacted during the Great Depression in hopes that the stock market crash of 1929 would not be repeated. The basic difference between the two acts was that the 1933 Act was to govern the original sales of securities by requiring that the issuers, the companies offering the securities, offer up sufficient information about themselves and the securities so that the potential buyers could make informed decisions. The 1934 Act was
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was created in 1914 primarily as a way for the government to “trust bust” or apply regulations ensuring a free marketplace for U.S. consumers and business enterprises. In this regard, the FTC enforces antitrust viola- tions that could hamper consumer interests, as well as federal consumer protection laws against fraud, deception, and unfair business practices. The commission’s primary enforcement mechanism is the Bureau of Consumer Protection, which is divided into seven divisions: (1) enforcement, (2) advertising practices, (3) financial practices, (4) marketing practices, (5) planning and information, (6) consumer and business educa- tion programs, and (7) privacy and identity protection.21 As the federal
Prior to the financial crisis, the overall responsibility for financial oversight was divided among several different agencies. These agencies and their “varying rules and standards led to certain entities not being regulated at all, with others subject to less oversight than their peer
The land of capitalism where business comes to thrive because when businesses can make or break the economic the government revolve around it. In fact, 6 percent of companies in America makes about 50 percent of American profit, this shows how much power comes with having and building a business America. In the early 2000s before the recession started, black-owned small businesses established 8.2 percent of all loan money from the Small Business Administration (SBA). That number is now depressed to 1.7 percent, per an analysis by the Wall Street Journal. The total volume of loans they are at this time getting is similarly low: 2.3 percent of the roughly 54,000 doled out through the agency, down from 11 percent in 2008. “(Covert, Bryce. Black Small Business Owners Get Left Out Of Loans)”
According to Black Enterprise, most other sectors of the business community have been able to access the money needed to grow their businesses over the last eight years. African American businesses, however, have not had this same benefit. In quantifiable numbers, African American businesses account for less than 2 percent of all Small Business Association Loans, even though Black-owned businesses comprise over 7 percent of the country's non-farm businesses.
seen to bring forth monetary gain. The profit margins should be a concern to most minorities as it
The FedBizOpps website was developed to provide information to minority-owned and small businesses on federal contracting opportunities. This website was developed because of the recognition that minority-owned and small businesses must play a critical role in the government's efforts to restore economic growth ("Obama Administration Increases Contract Opportunities", n.d.). The provision of maximum practicable opportunities for the involvement of small businesses in Federal Government contracting is essential because these businesses employ 50
The problem to be investigated is looking into shades of gray when it comes to ethical behavior. For years, companies have been operating within the law yet displayed very questionable behavior. Companies like Goldman and Sachs utilizing questionable trading techniques in order to gain a financial profit while leaving behind companies in the dust and eliminating hundreds if not thousands of jobs in the process. Ethics is more than doing what’s right or wrong. It’s a way of life and how we can have an effect on others.
Wall Street is known as the financial center of the world; its foundation is cemented with modern ideas. Its innovation of capitalism has driven the country’s economy to a whole new level. Not only is Wall Street the economic modernization benchmark for the United States but the whole world. It is fair to say that most of world’s economy revolves around the occurrences that take place on Wall Street. However, even with great technological and economic reforms, the culture of Wall Street lacks the order of emphasizing diversity amongst its financial hub. The nature of Wall Street exemplifies the racial and gender bias restrictions faced by many Americans and corrupts the basis of equal opportunity, which is a pillar of America’s economical heritage.
Chapter 2 Harvard Press Book (2006). Performance management: Measure and improve the effectiveness of your employees. (Chapter 2) Motivation: The Not-So-Secret Ingredient of High Performance. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Lynn, I., Hodge, Y. & Yemen G. (2007). Teamwork turmoil. University of Virginia Darden School Foundation. Beamish, P. & Jiang, R. & (2011). The Chinese fireworks industry. Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation. Kaplan, R.S. (2010). Leading change with strategy execution system. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Karkhardt, D. & Hanson, J. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the charts. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Katzenbach, J. & Smith, D. (1993). The discipline of team. Harvard Business Review. President and Fellows of Harvard College. Kerr, S. (1995). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive. 9 (1), 7-14 Download on class site Kramer, R.M. (2003). The harder they fall. Harvard Business School Publishing. Cambridge, MA. Montgomery, C.A. (2005). Newell Company: Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business School Press.
If the firm remains a partnership could the firm continue to compete on an equal footing with its competitors, would they be able to retain key employees? How would tangible as well as intangible assets be valued in its stock price as a public firm?