Writing Project-Accounting 757
Professor Stevens
December 17th 2012
In the United States today there are millions of corporations in many different industries. All of them must abide by the current taxation rules and regulations that have been set by IRS and congress. The Internal Revenue Code, which was originally founded in 1939, set the foundation for the codification that we have in place today. The code arranged all Federal Tax provisions in a logical order and placed them in a separate part of the federal status. Over the years, congress has updated and amended the tax code in 1954, in 1986 Tax Reform Act, and is constantly updating the code due to its importance in assessing judicial and administrative decisions. The
…show more content…
During the transaction, if the transferor receives boot, section 351(b) requires them to recognize the gain (capital, long-term, or short-term) equal to the lessor of the gain that would be recognized under section 1001 if the transferor were treated as selling property transferred and the fair market value of the boot received. Under section 351(b)(2), no such loss of any realized loss to be recognized (4)(8). There are situations where once the 351(a) factors are met, a transferor will transfer stock received to someone outside of the control group, and then the requirement after might not be met. A transferor might distribute some of the control received to the shareholders after the requirement based on 351(c). This type of distribution can be taxable to both the shareholders and the distributing corporation. Section 351(c) also relates to situations where there has been a transfer of stock to a corporation in a section 355 transactions (7). Section 351(c)(2) allows shareholders to dispose of all or part of the transfers stock without preventing the corporations Section 351 transaction from satisfying the “ control immediate after” requirement (4). Section 351(d) states that there are times when services, certain indebtedness, and accrued interest not treated as property as per James v. Commissioner, 53 T.C. 63 (1969); cf. Hospital Corporation of America v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 520
* b. Further allocation of amounts allocated to repurchased shares to various components of stockholder equity upon formal or constructive retirement.
While the IRS allows investment transactions to be treated as income or loss generators by some active traders, fund managers don’t have the same flexibility when it comes to treating assets as long-term capital gains, according to the Salt Lake City, UT-based professional hedge fund firm Capital Fund Law Group. This is the case when the transactions are recognized as ordinary income.
For corporations and individual tax filers alike, filing one’s taxes is no small feat due to the tax code’s complexity and volume. The number of laws, exclusions, exemptions, credits, taxes, deductions, and revisions are more than any one person
Round Table, Inc. and Avalon Corporation have agreed on a straight B-type reorganization, which will be signed on November 1st, 2015. However, it will not close and take effect until December 31st, 2016, where Round Table will acquire 90% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Avalon in exchange for common stock in Round Table. Avalon currently has 1,000 shares outstanding, all of which are voting common stock, that makeup a $40,000,000 market value ($40,000/share). In addition to the stock for stock agreement, the two entities have engaged in talks of other transactions that could have an effect on the tax-free makeup of a B-type reorganization.
The tax code, officially known as the Internal Revenue Code, is a major issue in today’s American society. There are many proponents of reforming our tax code who make the argument that we cannot just keep raising the “debt ceiling” and call it good. The opponents of tax reform argue that more and more taxes are needed to run the country. This paper will be looking at what elements of the American political system have influenced and shaped the tax code, and how changes in the tax code can compromise some of our constitutional ideals.
Did you know that the last major tax reform, the 1986 Tax Reform Law, was signed by President Reagan? At that time, the tax code was approximately 30,000 pages. Changes instituted by congress since 1986 have brought our tax code to over 70,000 pages. Tax regulations, in its current state, are minimally understood in their current form by the public that they apply to. Before congress, we now have a major overhaul of our tax regulations that have many tax payers questioning how these changes may impact their tax situations. H&R Block, as the industry leader, will see clients who are looking for answers on how these changes will impact them now and in the future. How we address these concerns will have an impact on our clients’ intent
Mimi’s continued involvement in the business is simple as she can maintain ownership and freely transfer assets; however, it is imperative that Mimi derives a Last and Will and Testament or a Shareholder’s Agreement to explicitly detail Mimi’s transferability of shares in Mimi’s Cupcakes Inc. Other concerns to discuss is the dissolution and liquidation of the corporation and the tax implication on the shareholders; for example, the dissolution of the corporation requires to file a notice of dissolution with the state. The assets of the corporation are liquidated by selling all its assets to the shareholders based upon liquid their shares of stock. Shareholders are required to recognize a gain or loss according to Section 336 on property
The code enumerates properties to be attached and sold in execution of a decree.[3] Likewise, it also specific properties which are not liable to be attached or sold.[4] It also prescribes the procedure where the same property is attached in execution of decrees by more than one court.[5] The code also declares that a private alienation of property after attachment is void.
The issue is not only a foreign consideration, it is a tax problem in general. The problem with substance-over-form doctrine goes back to Gregory v. Helvering 293 U.S. 465 (1935). This case was of a taxpayer who wanted to remove appreciated securities from her corporation which was wholly-owned in a manner which avoided the dividends to be taxed. The distribution of securities took place in six days and all three steps were complied with. The formation of a new capitalized subsidiary with securities that has appreciated. The taxpayer had a spin-off of the new subsidiary. And lastly the liquidation of the new subsidiary. The taxpayer should have recognized the capital from the liquidation for the subsidiary, had the form of this transaction been respected. The court did not respect the transaction, and deemed it was taxable as ordinary income.
Some legislative history to tax exemption organizations began between 1894 and 1969, the development of legislation led the structure of the current tax exemptions granted to charitable and voluntary sectors outlined in the United States Tax Code. The early tax regulations established around three major principles. First, organizations operating for charitable purposes were granted exemptions from Federal income tax. Second, charitable organizations were required to be free of private inurement. Third, an income tax deduction for contributions was developed and designed to encourage charitable giving for organizations. The Wilson-Gorham Tariff Act of 1884 provided an exemption for “corporations, companies, or associations organized and conducted solely for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, including fraternal beneficiary associations.” Ultimately this Act became famous for income tax provisions later found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The Underwood Tariff Act of 1913 established an income tax system with tax exemptions for certain organizations, most particularly for the Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber of Commerce appeared before the Senate Finance Committee during its deliberations because it was anxious that the existing tax exemptions would not protect nonprofit business groups. This Act also included an exemption for organizations dedicated to social welfare, the forerunner to today’s IRC 501(c)(4). Later, the Revenue Act of 1943 required
“Continuity of ownership interest – At least 50% of the consideration is acquirer stock (although transactions with as little as 40% stock consideration have qualified for tax-free treatment).
(2) received directly its proportionate share of the income of such other corporation (26 U.S.C. § 1297(c)).”
The new Republican tax bill Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, one of the biggest tax bill in decades, officially took effect in 2018. The bill will supposedly cut corporate and individual taxes by cutting income taxes, doubling the standard deduction, and eliminating personal exemptions. Trump promoted the bill, claiming that it would benefit the middle class Americans. However, new analysis by the Tax Policy Center shows that only the wealthy will benefit, as the major change is that corporate tax rate dropped from 35% to 21%, while the poor will pay more taxes unlike Trump’s proposal.
ii) Transfer: An investor is entitled to get the unit of shares certificates transferred with a period of 30 days from the date of lodgment of the offer.