Scientific Liability Of The Creation Story In Genesis

In Creation Science is not Science, Michael Ruse argues that Creation science is not science and in Science at the Bar- Causes for Concern, Larry Laudan opposes this view by arguing that Creation Science is science, but that it is false. In this paper, I argue that Michael Ruse had the better argument and that Creation Science is not science. First, I explain Ruse’s argument for why creation science does not meet the criteria for science. Second, I consider and explain Larry Laudan’s opposing view that creation science is false science. I then argue why I believe Ruse has the better argument.

The Christian Post, 11 May 2017, www.christianpost.com/news/does-science-confirm-the-bible-183181/. Morris, Henry M., and John David Morris. Scripture and Creation. Arkansas: Master Books, 1996. Morris, Henry M. “The Case Against Evolution.” Third Millennium Ministries, thirdmill.org/newfiles/hen_morris/hen_morris.AgainstEvolution.html.

The Dawkins chapter speaks about the debate between religion and science and how religious people refuse to even give science teachers and professors the time of day. Most of the time people will refuse to listen to what has been proven due to their religious beliefs. Evolution professors have even been threatened with the loss of their jobs. Even though, many professors have tried to explain that evolution is a fact and one of the greatest of God’s works, still their time is wasted. The pope and educated priests and professors of theology have been known to no longer have a problem with evolution because they understand that evolution is a fact and not intended to be an anti-religious study.

Based on biblical knowledge, life on earth began in approximately 5.000 B.C. In the bible when you read Genesis 1, it is called “The Beginning.” The very first verse in the bible says, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” As you read further along into Genesis, we are told that God created water, light, day and night, animals, and humans. In Genesis 1:27, it says, “So God created human beings in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” All of God’s creations were made over a span of 6 days. In the beginning, God created the first man, Adam, and the first woman, Eve. Adam and Eve were created for specific purposes and were the only Humans. Life on earth was simple. God gave Adam

We all know that our mothers and fathers gave us birth, and grandmothers and grandfathers gave our parents birth. However, what about the beginning? What does the beginning look like? Who created the sky, the earth, the mountains and rivers, the plants, the animals, and the human beings? How was the world created? What happened to the creator? These questions have puzzled and are asked by every people. However, no one has yet found the answers, and I have heard people saying that the creation of life is as impossible as the natural creation of an airplane from a stack of waste. With the willingness of knowing the self, ancient people tried to create mythological stories

"Muslim creation stories" and Genesis 2:4-3:8, these two passages are similar because they both speak about the creation of Adam, the naming of nature, the warning of not eating from the forbidden tree, and the mentioning of God creating the earth. The differences between these two passages is that in Genesis, it went into more detail about the creation of a woman (Eve), using the serpent to encourage Eve to eat from the forbidden tree and went into detail about the react after Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit. In "Muslim creation stories" it went into detail about God being Allah and emphasizing the use of the angels during the creation of this world. This passage also showed the consequences God has put upon Adam and Eve.

Biology professor Kenneth Miller’s central argument is that science should not undermine one’s faith in God. “Science itself does not contradict the hypothesis of God.” He makes this argument by stating that science explains the things that God has made and in doing so, trying to prove the existence of God through natural or scientific means does not make sense. Once the supernatural is introduced, there is no way to use nature, thus science, to prove or disprove its existence. Miller argues that science gives us the window to the dynamic and creative universe that increases our appreciation of God’s work. The central point of his argument is evolution. Creationists, of the intelligent design movement, argue that nature has irreducible complex systems that could have only arisen from a creature or designer. This theory is widely supported among devout believers in the Bible and God. Miller argues that if they truly believe this, completely ignoring hard facts and theories, then they are seeking their God in the darkness. Miller, a Christian himself, believes that this “flow of logic is depressing”; to fear the acquisition of knowledge and suggest that the creator dwells in the shadows of science and understanding is taking us back to the Middle Ages, where people used God as an explanation for something they have yet to or want

Due to the "highly subjective nature of most scientific theorizing... [we should] let the Bible speak for itself and modify our scientific view of origins accordingly." (as cited in Downey, D., & Porter, S., 2009).

Throughout Genesis 1-11, one of the main subjects covered is the natural world. Genesis 1 in particular provides crucial information for understanding the origin of the natural world. In the first verse of the entire Bible (Genesis 1:1), the reader is immediately told that “God created the heavens and the earth.” Additionally, the reader is informed that “there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day” (Genesis 1:31), showing that God’s work of creation took six days. Because I believe that God created the world in six literal days, the foundation of my worldview is entirely different than the foundation of an atheist’s worldview. When I look at the world around me, I do not view everything around me as the product of random chance and evolution; instead, I see everything around me as the handiwork of God.

Biases are one of the biggest roadblocks when reading the Bible. When one comes in with beliefs that are already established and engrained in your mind,) whether it is from the church one grew up in, or a school attended) it causes blind spots. “ In my experience most Christians and readers of the Bible come to Genesis 1 with many of their beliefs already in hand.” Realizing that there is a lot more that goes into reading the Bible than any other book may help you keep an open mind. The Bible is a translation of a translation; it’s like playing a gigantic game of telephone, where only some people speak the same language. This all points to the thought that reading Genesis should not be read as a literal defense against science but to prove

Man was created to keep the earth but we have failed at that, we have not listened to the Genesis myth about being the caretakers, we have destroyed and pillaged the land. The creation myth was supposed to keep the earth pure but we justified it as a way to do what we want with it(Earth) and therefor have had a negative effect on the earth due to the genesis creation myth.

If ten bystanders were to witness the same crime, how many different interpretations of the scene would there be? All the opinions and viewpoints that arise from one scenario are very dependant on different variables. The same can be applied when analyzing the book of Genesis. One controversial topic is whether to take it literally or figuratively. Some of the different arguments supporting and opposing either side include; the original beliefs of the interpreter, the historical time frame, the different genres of writing in the book, and more. There are many perceptions of the book of Genesis being literal or figurative.

Understanding the bible, both in its inspiration and authority, shapes how we decipher the stories in the bible and how we receive messages and revelations from God. Fundamentalists and Contextualists have profoundly different assumptions and perspectives when reading bible stories which impacts the messages they receive. In this essay I will address the point of views taken from a Fundamentalists and Contextualist in regards to the world and the human creation accounts, the miracle stories told in the Gospel writings and the story of Mary near the cross at Jesus’ crucifixion.

Throughout the many years I have attended High Point, I have been taught that the Bible is the absolute truth and authority in this fallen world. This includes the Biblical teaching of Creationism, which is the belief that the universe and life originated from the acts of a divine creator. Furthermore, this opposes evolution, which teaches that life originated naturally through the changes of heritable characteristics over multiple generations. Personally, I have fully accepted the teachings of the Bible and Creationism by faith, as both have proven to be accurate historically, scientifically, and philosophically. For this reason, I perceive the world around me with a Christian worldview.

The book of Genesis is often referred to as the book of beginnings. Genesis is the first book that begins the Old Testament, it is also the first book of the entire Bible. The Lord also began the world in the book of Genesis, He made the heavens and the earth, man and woman. In Genesis chapters one through eleven, the Bible teaches us stories that most of us have grown up hearing in Sunday School such as the creation account, Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Noah and the flood and the tower of Babel. In this book of beginnings, we are shown some of Gods characteristics; we see that God is love and He showed His love by creating us and the world, on the other extreme, we also see the wrath of God. Through these teachings, we are able to see that God ultimately in control and holds everything in His balance. The stories of Genesis aren’t just stories; they are real life accounts that can help build and shape a worldview on things regarding the natural world, human identity, human relationships and civilization.