Saving Manatee Response

This response clearly introduces a topic in a manner that follows from the task and purpose (In both of the excerpts “Keep the ‘Wild’ in Wildlife” and “Saving Manatees” both of the authors bring up the same idea that we shouldn’t let people touch wild animals. People should just look at them without touching them and disturbing them. In the first example they use examples to show how harmful doing this can be and in the second one they use Manatees as an example to show why we shouldn’t touch wildlife. They both have the same idea about keeping the wild, wild. The response demonstrates grade-appropriate analysis of the texts (He says that if we do something to them you may be hurting them as that is something that is normal for the animal; This …show more content…

They are a great thing in nature and we should just watch and observe how beautiful nature really is; Animals and the things that they do are special and we should just enjoy it instead of messing around with them. The response develops the topic with relevant, well-chosen details from the texts (“Generally, the best thing to do is leave the animal alone. This protects both you and the animal.”; “These are “hands-on” examples of experts providing help when wildlife are in trouble, and they still both involve wildlife rehabilitators. Wildlife rehab is the answer for an injured animal. But, in general, the best bet for your safety, and that of the animal involved, is to leave wildlife alone, whenever possible, keeping them truly wild.”; “I believe in the “no touch” policy when it comes to wild animals. Wild animals remain wild when man does not interfere with their behavior.”; ““Look, but don’t touch” may be the best way to mind your manatee manners. And besides, people actually have the most to gain by remaining at a distance when they spot a manatee in the