Samurai Knights Dbq

Samurai and Knights are warriors fighting and serving for their lord. Samurai and knights are both trained, physically and mentally to fight for their lords, however while in a battle, strategies of both make it hard to distinguish who would win. While both warriors are very similar in many ways, Samurais differences such as their, training, weapons, and armor give them big advantages.

Japanese Samurai Warriors and European Knights have many similarities and differences throughout their training, armor, and codes. Both the Samurai’s and Knights’ training involve starting at a young age, training with artificial swords, and promoting around the age of 14. This is shown in Document A, “the rigorous training of samurai began in childhood”. Document B states, “ A prospective knight’s training began at age four or five“. There are also many differences to these two warriors’ training .

Samurai and Knights DBQ More than one thousand years ago, two of the greatest types of fighters risen; the samurai and knights had many differences but even more similarities. Both their training was challenging in its own way. The samurai and knights armor were both protective, but looked and felt very different. They both followed different codes but The Code of Bushido (Samurai) and the Code of Chivalry (Knights) had massive similarities. Even how they thought they would die was different!

Who will be the remaining survivors? In reality, samurais and knights were too far away to even participate in a fatal quarrel. But if samurais and knights were put in a battlefield, Samurais are eligible to win a squabble for certain reasons. These reasons vary such as weapons, codes, and their fantastic training.

Have you ever thought about the legendary samurai and the amazing knights? Have you ever asked yourself which was better in a fight? From approximately 1000 to 1600 CE these two fierce warriors fought, the knights in Europe and the samurai in Japan. The similarities between the knights and samurai are greater than the differences because of their codes, how they prepared for battle, and feudalism.

Knights are the European warriors that go into battle to protect their kingdom. Meanwhile, samurai defend and protect Japan and its people. If the two warriors were to go to battle or war, I think that a samurai would win. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai t= and this can be seen in the samurai code, armor/training, and training.

Both the samurai and knights belonged and worked for their lord for their whole lives and were completely devoted to them. Furthermore, the samurai and knights were similar because they both had a lord but they also had similar training. Both samurai and knights started training young, and started training with things like poetry and religious training (Document C). They learned to have loyalty and devotion to their lord and respect their religion.

Samurai and knights had a lot in common but they also had a lot of differences in training, armor, and code. As said in document A and B, Both of the Samurai’s training and the knights training began when they were only children. Another similarity in training as said in Document A and B, was when they were young they would practice with fake weapons, the samurai would study Kendo and the knights would practice fighting with wooden swords. But they also had differences in training. As said in document A “School was a unique combination of physical training, poetry, and spiritual discipline.”

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

How were knights and samurai similar? In Europe and Japan, there were issues that lead to a samurai and knights. The countries' government was not stable and quickly falling apart and so was the military. There were people invading their land and with an unstable government, they needed help before the invaders took over their way of life. Historians believe knights and samurai were different in their feelings about death, but they are more similar. They were both a warrior class and both showed loyalty to their master.

While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their training, weapons, and beliefs. The first way samurais have an advantage is in their training. In document C1 taken from a show on PBS it says. “The rigorous training of samurai began when they were children.” This shows that the samurai have been training from a very young age.

Another way the samurai and knights were related is through their military role. Document C compares the training of the samurai and knight. Both started training at a fairly early age, and both used training tools that were not lethal. Also, the comparison is made between the armor of each, showing they each used some form of iron plate to protect themselves. While there were numerous similarities in the training of samurai and knights, there were

Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty

The Knights of Europe and the Samurai of Japan shared quite a few similarities; however, they do also share many differences. One such similarity would be that both the Knights and the Samurais were brave, strong, and loyal to their cause, especially due to both of their trainings starting at a very young age. An example of a difference would be the samurais having a much lighter armor than knights. This allowed for a more agile army. They also ascended to their titles at separate ages, with samurais being at a mere 14 years of age, and knights being 21.

The samurai were warriors who were more of less the equivalent of feudal knights apart from some differences such as being able to read and being skilled at Japanese art . The word Samurai actually means “one who serves” They were employed by the shogun (daimyo) these people were members of a warrior class that followed a strict code.This code defined what they wore (clothes and armour) and how they acted on the battlefield. The age of the Samurai lasted for almost 700 years form approx.1185 to 1867. The family members of Samurai warriors were considered ‘elite’. The samurai were expected to fight as fierce warriors but were also taught to be lovers of art and poetry this was know as “the way of life of the warrior”