Samurai And Knights Similarities

Samurai and Knights are warriors fighting and serving for their lord. Samurai and knights are both trained, physically and mentally to fight for their lords, however while in a battle, strategies of both make it hard to distinguish who would win. While both warriors are very similar in many ways, Samurais differences such as their, training, weapons, and armor give them big advantages.

Samurai and knights similarities were greater than the differences because they started doing things like protecting the lord and training to become a samurai or knight around the same age and social order in the pyramids were about the same. When it came to how their armour was like they were very similar they. Samurai armor had small iron scales that were tied together,lacquered,and then they were pounded into armor plates with silk or they could also have leather cords on them there helmet blows were usually made out of 8 to 12 iron plates and then 5-piece neck guards the armor they wore had four parts, but samurai never wore armor on their right arm so that they could draw their weapons faster the only thing about the samurai armor was

What are the similarities and differences between the samurai and knights? A knight was a loyal military soldier and a samurai was a military soldier for Japan. Samurai and knights were the same because of their views on honor and death, training and armor, and their social position. To start off, their views on honor and death of the samurai and knights were the same. In document E it states that both of them have a soft side: samurais find peace in their hands and knights find peace in giving mercy to those who ask.

There are many similarities between the samurai of medieval Japan and the knights of medieval Europe, especially considering their training, armor, and the code that they live by. For example, Documents A and B discuss that both the samurai and knight, begins training in childhood, at about fourteen years of age, progress to the next level, and trained with sticks rather than real weapons. However Documents A and B also state that samurais practice the religion of Zen Buddhism, while knights were given very little religious instructions. According to Document A,¨Squires continued with weapons training, but were already considered to be fighting men. They would accompany their master knight into battle, dress him, feed him, care for his horses

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

Samurai and knights were also different when it came to training and warfare. When samurai trained, they did not only cover sword skills but also covered poetry and art. Knights focused mainly on sword training and how to fight while riding a horse (Doc C). Also, knights had armor made of metal plates and chain mail. On the other hand, the samurai had armor that was tied together with silk thread.

A knight in Feudal Europe were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for in return, land. A samurai in Feudal Japan were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for either regular payment or land. While knights and samurais have many similarites, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons& armor, code , and training.

The first reason why the knights and the samurai are more different than alike is because of their code of honor. Document E states that there are two different codes of honor. The code of honor of the samurai was called Bushido. In Bushido, samurai are loyal to their family and to friends. They devote themselves to helping others. In chivalry, knights were to be helpful to ladies. They always had to be loyal to the king. People may think that just because they both have codes of honor and they are loyal to others means they are the

Medieval samurai and knights are much more similar than you think. In fact, they were nearly the same thing! As you have been taught that samurai and knights were nowhere near the same, I am here to inform you of the facts. These two warriors were both apart of a feudalism system. They also had an alike childhood as they were both trained for their roles in the world. Finally, both samurai and knights had a life code to live by. These are just the three large reasons as to why samurai and knights were very similar.

For Japan and Europe, it was a time of trouble…Document “In the late 400’s both Europe and Japan created a feudal system in order to keep peace in the land. Lords acquired large estates of land. They granted some of their lands to lesser nobles, whom promised to fight when conflicts arose.” Background Essay DBQ. So where the similarities greater, or were the differences greater? The samurai and knights were more similar than different in three broad areas, social position, training and armor and the code of honor.

The first reason why the differences are greater than the similarities is because of the social order in feudal Japan and Europe. ”Historians and other scholars use social pyramids to show how societies were structured” (Document A). The samurai owned loyalty and military service to daimyo 's for land or regular payment while on the other hand knights owned loyalty and military service to the lords. Another difference about samurais and knights was the population. Samurai with families took about 10% of Japan 's population and in Europe, there was estimated 12,000 knights in England and Normany France in the 12th century. One more difference is that there are four people above the knight in the social order but only three for samurai.

From researching about knights and samurai, I believe that in a battle between a knight and samurai, the knight would have a greater chance in winning. This is because knights focused more on fighting techniques and how to improve them, rather than focusing on spiritual beliefs and traditions as well, which is what the samurai did. The knights also had very strong and good armour which helped a lot in battles, while the samurai’s armour changed a lot but wasn’t ever as effective as the knight’s armour. The knight’s weapons were also more advanced and better then the samurai weapons.

Samurai training is more fit for training warriors than knight training. First of all, samaurai training involves all attributes that one needs to have in order to be a warrior. It incorporates both physical and spiritual training, both of which are important for effectively training a strong warrior who is ready for battle. Samurais train through martial arts, which is very beneficial for both the body and the mind. In order to be a warrior you must be fit physically and also mentally. Samurai training stresses this concept in order to create warriors well enough for battle. Samauri training also enforces a strict ethical code , called Bushido, which a samurai must live by. Included in this code are rules about staying faithful to one's

Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty

The Knights of Europe and the Samurai of Japan shared quite a few similarities; however, they do also share many differences. One such similarity would be that both the Knights and the Samurais were brave, strong, and loyal to their cause, especially due to both of their trainings starting at a very young age. An example of a difference would be the samurais having a much lighter armor than knights. This allowed for a more agile army. They also ascended to their titles at separate ages, with samurais being at a mere 14 years of age, and knights being 21.