Same Sex Education Vs Single-Sex School Essay

Hutchison and Mikulski argue that students tend to concentrate better when boys and girls are separated. “Both principals and teachers believed that the main benefits of single-sex schooling are decreasing distractions to learning and improving student achievement.” However, single sex education does not provide socialization. Educating students in single sex classes limits both genders from interacting and working together. One day they will coexist with the opposite sex but how are single sex schools/classes going to prepare the student to interact with the opposite sex when they are

However, despite the many advantages, there are also down-sides of single-sex schools and education. Kristin Stanberry, a writer and editor specializing in parenting, education, and consumer health/wellness issues, argues that there are many who believe that gender separation is not wise as there aren’t many instructors who are able to adapt their teaching methods and understandings to only one gender. This could lead to a worse development and achievements, the exact opposite of what single-ed’s aim is. Even more, maybe the greatest counter-argument is that this way of education promotes discrimination and sexism. This is what many people believe, among them being the American Civil Liberties Union which even filed a suit against a school in Kentucky for organizing single-sex classes in their institution (Single-Sex Education: the pros and cons). By attending a single-sex school, people may develop shyness and have problems interacting with the other sex in the future, for there was no precedent during their education.

When it comes to the classroom, there are several differences between girls and boys. There are physical differences in the way their brains work, differences in the room temperature that is best for boys and girls, and differences in how girls and boys respond to various tones of speech (Sax, 2006). While girls prefer soft-spoken teachers, Sax (2006) notes that boys prefer to be spoken to “loudly and in short, direct sentences with clear instructions” (p. 195). According to Sax (2006), “the ideal ambient temperature for boys is about 69 degrees and about 75 degrees for girls” (p. 193-194). Further differences involve how boys and girls learn. McNeil states that “boys may learn better under pressure and when allowed to move around...while girls may perform better in group situations and with a lot of encouragement” (McNeil, 2008). Because of these many differences, it would stand to reason that boys and girls would benefit from being in separate classrooms. According to Hughes (2007), “the teacher would be able to concentrate on the learning-styles of each sex and use the styles to bring out the academic best in each students. Lessons and activities could be designed with a single-sex in mind” (p. 11). As Principal John Fox states, “the single-sex environment enables you to actually focus on the particular needs of each gender, and those needs socially and

People have joined together to make public education districts, offer single sex education for those to benefit from. “Children learn in different ways. For some, single sex classrooms make all the difference” (8). Boys and Girls grasp information better in gender based surroundings, especially in core classes: math and science. Perhaps, students will retain focus in what is being taught and will become less distributed knowing they’re in same gender classes, thus succeeding.

Until the 20th century, education in the United States was gender-specific. Coeducation progressively came into the American educational landscape in the late 1800s, and since that time, same-sex education primarily has been confined to exclusive and denominational schools. Beginning in 2002, after the No Child Left Behind Act was passed, single-sex education has been growing in popularity. According to the National Association for Single Sex Public Education, the United States has over 95 single-sex public schools and more than 445 public coed schools offer single-sex classrooms (Novotney, Amy). With the popularity on the rise, many questions have been asked as to whether this divide in the classroom is academically ailing to a child’s learning or if it is not. By examining the successes of single-sex classrooms, school districts and parent’s can more fully understand that single-sex classes can implement changes to enhance students learning abilities.

In her essay “ Single-Sex Schools: An Old Time Idea Whose Time Has Come,” Diane Urbina Argues that it would be more beneficial if we had single-sex schools. The myth is debunked is that boys and girls are restricted by nature in relation to what they can learn and how fast. Rather, their brain development is restricted, and so they can only learn so much in a certain time period. Boys learn literacy skills more slowly. Girls have trouble with math. Therefore, boys and girls who attend

Education has been an important factor of all of our lives for an exceptional amount of time, but unfortunately, America has been falling behind from other nations in their education system compared to other nations (Pahlke 444). Almost all of our public schools in our country are coeducational and only handful of them are single-sex educational schools. Single-sex education should be taken into high consideration for most students to attend because of the benefits they might gain from them. It is important to look at all possible ways to try and better our education system for the benefit of the children and teenagers attending school. The most important years of schooling that provide a solid background for all students would be

Did you know that single-sex classrooms are the worst classes ever? Over the past decade, single-gender classrooms have been opened in at least 230 schools in the rural, suburban, and the urban areas. Single-gender classrooms are classrooms where either young girls’ are in one class together, or young boys are in another class together. Single-sex classrooms were created because studies showed that boys and girls learn differently and they could benefit from being in a classroom with peers to whom they can relate. Since 2008, single-gender education has been the key to improved educational performance among boys and girls throughout the years. Today, gender differences among girls and boys are steadily rising in the classrooms they are in,

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion about something, but an opinion differentiates from a fact. A boy or a girl could have come from a coeducational school and transitioned to a single gender school and could have said it was the best thing for her/him or vice versa. Every student is different which comes with a different learning style. When most students attend a single gender school, they feel more free to express themselves and not worried about who is judging them. Single gender schools helps students build self-esteem for themselves. Most students cannot handle the pressure of dealing with coeducational schools and some students can. As students get older, little do they know, at some point they are going to have to deal with the opposite sex rather they like it or not. Since men and women are likely to interact in the workplace and in the home, schools teach life and social skills to children so they will not be so hesitant in life. School can be an environment in which boys and girls are going to come to differences that could come to be understood by putting them together in the same environment. The point of school is to prepare students for life and separating may not be the best

Many schools across the country are now changing their average classrooms to “segregated” classes. Despite the students choice of being into a classroom like this there are still various controversial issues that cause chaos when people talk about single gender classrooms. Some  people believe single gender classrooms are beneficial to the students and some believe they are the worst thing man could have created but, both of those statements are very inaccurate. There are many downfalls for single classes one being the students will have a hard time socializing with the opposing gender

Many people might say the single sex schools are ineffective, because girls and boys need to know how to communicate with the opposite sex. They should be enforced to help children reach their full dreams without the thought of humility standing in their way. School is a place where students get acquainted with the basics of the life, which further helps them to foster their proficiency level in different aspects of life required in this competitive world, and the most important part of school is not where students get time to socialize with each other. Although Co-ed schools are a first choice for most adolescents and their parents, Single sex schools are equally good. In single sex schools, students don't have to worry about sexual

A few years ago, separate classes for male and female students were common, but have decreased today. However, some parents are still worried about students’ attention during the class at coed schools. This thought maybe not correct. Because students at coed schools can learn ways to understand and to build friendships with members of other genders, coed school curriculum is more effective for their future lives. Staying in the same classroom, boys and girls have better educational and personal experiences.

Single sex schools also break down gender stereotypes (“Advantages”). In coed schools, typically boys tend to overshadow equally talented girls (Mullins). Boys tend act more assertively, aggressively, vying for the teacher’s attention in the classroom, whereas girls tend to participate less due to their subservient attitude in coeducation classrooms. (Hughes). The pressure of a male dominated class may pressure girls into giving up in class. In coed schools, both genders distract each other: The students worry more about how they look than their education (Hughes). In single sex schools, however, students focus more on school than on the opposite sex (Whelan). By separating the sexes, the temptation, embarrassment, and distraction go away. This allows both genders to explore nontraditional disciplines typically not seen in coed schools. Girls take more leadership roles in the classroom, and those who give up in coed classes participate more in single-sex classes (Schultz). Girls also pursue nontraditional disciplines in single sex schools (Mullins). Girls commonly

The advocators of single-sex schools say that each gender has its own ideas and beliefs. These studies confirmed also that the single-sex education student is able to control his feelings after graduating without being affected by the teenagers' thoughts. So they support the individual emotional maturity. While others believe that the isolation of the sex is not only boring but it also ruins the whole social thoughts, then it creates a fruitless community, not co-operated with the other gender. They think that the single sex education students are dealing in an artificial way as the real society requires that both sexes should be in combination. So it is better that all students live a normal life with each other

A second example to help argue my point is when United Kingdom educator Graham Able compared student performance in 30 single-sex and co-educational schools, he found the academic advantage of single-sex schooling even greater for boys. This evidence shows that single sex is the better school option for learning and getter better academic results, especially if your child is a boy. Single sex schooling is the better choice when selecting your child’s future school specially when you are looking for the best possible education.