preview

Rosina Lippi-Green Stereotypes

Decent Essays

The object of this essay is to provide an argument mapping of Rosina Lippi-Green’s article, “Teaching Children How to Discriminate: What We Learn from the Big Bad Wolf.” So that I can successfully map this article, I will accomplish the following. I will start off by identifying the main claims made in the article. Then I will focus on the assumptions made by Lippi-Green. I will also be analyzing the sociolinguistic and ethnographic claims made, and I will also present the necessary evidence needed to back up these claims. In doing so, I will attempt to find the general conclusions made throughout the author’s article. Finally, I will examine the main conclusion, and the way in which ethnographic ideologies in our society are related to the …show more content…

I will first address her five sociolinguistic claims that are not supported directly by her own empirical research, but can still be considered claims because she provides evidence and support them by addressing specific films or the research done by other people. These claims consist of the anti-semitic message and the link between evil intentions and things Jewish, how a director or actor target a certain social, regional, or foreign accent of English because it is inherent to the role, the way in which sometimes accents suggest dialogue that would normally be in another language, accents which are used to establish origin, and the way in which films use language variation and accent quickly characterize and stereotype a character.The last two sociolinguistic claims also tie into our society’s ethnographic ideologies in that by using language variation and accent, we can characterize a character through our own preconceived ideas and notions about the accent. Lippi-Green also makes eight prevailing sociolinguistic claims which are supported by her own evidence: most characters speak mainstream US English (MUSE), characters in the Disney films with foreign accents have more negative representations while characters with MUSE accents have more typically positive representations, all AAVE speaking characters appear in animal form, and these African American are not allowed many possibilities but they can want the things they can’t have, parenthood and romance don’t intersect, few married couples have major roles in the films, men tend to have more opportunities to be expressive than women, and French speaking characters usually reinforce the prototypical French stereotype. These claims are tied into and supported by her own research, and they will also be useful in contributing to the general conclusions that the author draws. Lippi-Green includes two ethnographic claims

Get Access