Recently I was involved in a argument with one of my teammates on my soccer team. As the captain of my team it is my duty to make sure all the members receive relatively equal amounts of playing time in each game. In my opinion, the more skilled players who attend more games and practices should receive a greater amount of playing time in comparison to those who do not. I got into an argument with a teammate who felt he was not receiving enough playing time in comparison to others. He reasoned that since he was unable to attend previous games, he had the right to have more playing time in the future games to fairly distribute playing time between him and other members of our team. I argued that his inability to attend most practices and missing …show more content…
I chose to use the Root Cause Analysis method to examine my conflict and attempt to draw possible solutions. The first step defined in this method is to define the problem by identifying what exactly is occurring and the specific symptoms. In my case, the problem is that a teammate believes that he deserves more playing time during games than other teammates and it is hurting the overall team performance. Some of the symptoms include frustration from other teammates and inconsistency in team performance as teammates are becoming angered that someone who is not committed believes they deserve more playing time. The next step is to collect data by analyzing how long the problem existed, its impact, and proofs that one exists. This particular teammate who began the argument did not consistently show up to practices or games since the start of the season which was in January. Now in May when we have developed our team and its chemistry and have a shot to win the tournament, he decides to come to games while still being absent in most practices. It is evident that the problem exists as it has impacted our team …show more content…
The particular teammate who initialized the argument did not attend previous games and practices. This lack of absence and aggressive behavior while demanding more playing were events that lead to future mistrust and lack of team-oriented play. Players became greedy and did not use support from the team further damaging the overall performance. Injuries to teammates and frustration could have contributed to our lack of performance. Other conflicts like consistent losses and fights that broke out during games because of frustration only augmented and worsened the situation. The fourth step is to identify the root causes. In this case, the root cause of the problem appears to be the teammates inability to consistently attend practices. It is possible that his inability to attend practices is because of other commitments he made. The reason causal factors like frustration and a lack of trust seem to exist between teammates is because of consistent losses or lack of wins during games. The fifth and final step is to recommend and implement solutions that will also keep the problem from reoccurring. There are two reasonable conclusions in my case. One would be to gather all of
By working as hard as a player can, they show themselves and others how determined they are. Coaches and teammates will not always get along with an athlete, but if they are dedicated they will still try as hard as they possibly can to hopefully avoid the issue. The extensive, excruciating practices also differentiate the players who are concerned about their performance from those who are not. Out of a hundred reasons not to show up at practice, that one dedicated athlete will find just one reason to show
Their practice became full of actions and hatred that result to an accident. As my friend was so young at that time, he got his left arm seriously injured when this teammate of him unintentionally fell down to him. That scenario was not just resulted in physical harm, but also in psychological harm for the both of them. That accident caused trauma to my friend. Because his injury was so serious, he cannot play basketball for almost a year.
Cappozzoli, Thomas K. (1995, Dec). Resolving conflict within teams. Journal for Quality and Participation. v18n7, p. 28-30
As a parent or guardian of the player, I understand that I will do my best to make the players follows all rules stated above. I will not contact coaches regarding playing time, player's position, or team strategy at any time. The only reason for me to contact the coaches would be regarding the player's health or well-being, as well as the player's academics.
There can be many factors that play a role, when conflict arises within a team. Often there can be
The following practices were disastrous, some of the team did not even bother to show up. Coach quickly got fed up with the no show teammates. When we would scrimmage with the other teams we would always lose. This led to team arguments and lack of teamwork. Coach finally said that he had had enough with the team and stated he had coached our team voluntarily. That day
The coach also does not create any positive feedback for the weaker links on the team to work with. Instead of telling the team they ALL did well, the coach focuses on who are the better athletes. As a result, the members feel
players were some of my best friends and they would ask me questions about their game or their stats. The coaches always told the players they were not to question what I said, when it came to game stats. This was important because of a point system our school used. The players lost points for fouls and turnovers and gained points for positive stats or plays. They were not to question what I said in that part of the game. The coaches and players asked my opinion on different things and they always valued what I said. They didn't always go with my view, but it was considered equally with the players' views.
Athletes who want to win and love the game demonstrate it by trying their hardest every play and through every practice as well. Athletes who do not always try their hardest or skip practice frequently do not deserve to play and should be benched. Playing time is unequal, but anybody who proves himself will receive more playing time. Varsity sports are also not about pleasing people, they play to win and compete to their fullest, so athletes should have to earn the right to play. Having respect for coaches and teammates also plays a significant role in earning the right to play varsity. Through my own experiences, I have noticed coaches are much more likely to play someone who respects what they say. For example, an athlete on my baseball team last year, who talked back to the coach and frequently skipped practice, lost his starting position on varsity. After our coach had enough of his behavior and lack of effort towards the team, he found a replacement who had earned the right to play by proving himself and respecting everyone around him. The original starter was decent but did not deserve to play at all, and once he realized that, it was too late. The replacement shined on the diamond the first time he played, and ever since, has kept proving to coach why he was the best option for the team. This incident really displayed how even though someone may be adequate, he should never be entitled to play over another athlete who is more deserving of that
2. Hold a meeting among all team members and coaches to communicate honestly and openly in order to find and solve the problems especially
The dynamics of a team relies heavily on the interaction of team members during times of conflict not just during times of agreement. Often groups seek to achieve a cohesive relationship in an effort to unite the team towards its goals. Group members can make the mistake of subverting conflict in an attempt to maintain this team unity. Conflict serves a valuable role in effective group interactions that must be understood by participants of a team. An examination into the characteristics of conflict and cohesion and the relationship between the two dynamics can provide perspective to
Conflict results from real or perceived opposition to one’s values, actions, desires or general interests. Conflicts may occur internally or externally between individuals or groups; conflict within a team environment can cause frustration, and occasionally anger. However, conflict resolution can also often generate positive results for the team. Conflict management skills remain in demand; conflict may be managed successfully by reaching an agreement that satisfies the needs of both the individual(s) and the team as a whole
Conflict arises from various sources in the team setting (Capozzoli, 1995). The most common causes of conflict are values, attitudes, needs, expectations, perceptions, resources, and personalities. As we are all raised with different values, morals come into play when the team issue deals directly or indirectly with ones values, morals, or ethics. Conflicting attitudes can bring about problems as two or more team members prove to have differing goals in mind. Individual needs can cause rifts within a team when they are not satisfied. The expectations of team members are not the same on how the goal will be met. We all have different perceptions of life situation and interpret them differently. The lack of resources needed to complete a task can cause conflict. Differing personalities play a major role in team conflict.
Conflict is inevitable and at times stimulates beneficial or creative thinking. Often conflict is a signal that people are miscommunicating and making different assumptions about what has gone unspoken. The conflict in itself is not the problem. It is the team’s reactions to it that determines the impact, thus causing it to be a negative experience. Conflict or divergence can be destructive or it can be constructive. It is up to the people involved in the conflict to manage the outcome. This gives them an opportunity to articulate their assumptions and figure out a way to come to agreement. In a learning team situation, conflict can arise when the original agreement to work together does not address
In resolving conflict, ask the question, “How do we keep this from happening again?” The first thing is to be objective. This helps in managing conflict by keeping team members focused on the problem at hand (Huber, 2007)