Rome as we know it was not built in a day. It took years for the vastest empire of its time to become what we know it as today. Rome was an impressive military power and was organized in how they handled their affairs. The success of Rome comes down to a few major factors, such as, the strong leadership of Rome, the way they handled conquered lands as well as technological advancement. These factors can be seen as the foundation of the successes of the Roman Empire and were later taken on by successive empires and countries later on. However, out of all of these factors, one of them played a more crucial role in the success of the Roman Empire. The strong leadership of Rome can be said to be the most influential cause of the achievements of …show more content…
Plebeians were able to become members of the Senate after the Conflict of Orders. The first plebeians to be elected to office were called novus homos, as they were the first of their family to serve in the senate. This term means new man. This is important because now Roman leadership could be drawn from both classes and not just patricians. For Rome to be successful, it needed the advice of all of its citizens, no matter what class they came from. Many influential Romans were novus homos. One example of an influential novus homo is Cicero. In his first speech to the Senate as consul, Cicero makes a point to announce that he is a novus homo. Cicero goes on about how proud he is of the fact that he has no consular lineage. He thinks of his consulship as a huge honor. Cicero then became an influential member of the Senate. He was known for being an excellent orator and for giving very powerful speeches. Another example of an influential novus homo was Gaius Marius. Gaius Marius was a successful Roman general and consul. The importance of Gaius Marius will be discussed later. Romans were typically set in their ways. It was already difficult to become consul for consular families and it was even more difficult for novus homos. However, political power could not remain in the hands of the wealthy for long. For the empire to succeeded they needed new leadership and new ideas. The introduction of the novus …show more content…
My partner mentioned that I could beef up my introduction and conclusion. This was something that I noticed as well. I have a hard time writing introductions and conclusions. I added more background information to the introduction and tried to end my paper in a better way. My partner also made note that my paper did not flow very well. She mentioned that I should link my paragraphs. I did notice this in my writing and made a point to go back and fix this in my paper. I wanted to link my topics so they did not just stand alone and they could be connected to each other. Before my paragraphs were stand alone paragraphs and went back and linked them together in a way that makes sense. My partner also made note that I needed to correct my first footnote. I went back and corrected my footnote and fix my bibliography as well. I tried to make my ideas flow in a way that also made sense. My partner pointed out that parts of the paper just jumped from one idea to the next. I went back to make the ideas flow more continuously. I appreciate that my partner said I did an excellent job of cutting to the chase and saying my arguments in a direct manner. I would like to think that I took the criticism of paper seriously and went back into my paper and made the appropriate
Fall: when Rome lost their leadership and many people in the area. When Rome lost their leadership and many people left the area, it “fell”. Ancient Rome fell around 200 B.C. Lots contributed to the fall. Things such as the instability of leaders and the many invasions. Not to mention things they couldn’t control such as natural disasters. All of these led to the fall of Rome.
In its time, the Roman Empire was the largest empire the world had ever seen. The fact that the Romans were able to control and obtain an empire of this size was due to plenty of factors, but the main ones are the Roman army, the Roman roads, Pax Romana, the borders of the empire, and the benefits of the barbarians who became ruled by the empire. On their own, these factors wouldn’t do much at all, but such a combination brought great success.
Over the course of several centuries, Rome built one of the largest empires the world have ever known. Rome for a period of time was considered the center of civilization. The empire was beautiful. It was often invaded but well protected by a powerful army. Some people believed the empire would last forever.
When we think about the historical significance of Rome, it comes down to its leaders and how these leaders ruled in their era. Confidence, commitment, inspiration, intuition, and creativity, are all essential traits that a ruler must possess. In my opinion, no one has demonstrated these important characteristics better than Caesar Augustus, or better known as Octavian. Octavian showed how good of administrator he was, which was well needed after years of civil strife and social unrest. On the other hand, military genius, Julius Caesar, was lacking in administrative qualities which infect, lead his era to have a period of civil war and bloodshed.
According to document F, members of the Roman Senate consisted of about 300 men that served the duration of a lifetime. The Senate had primary responsibilities for foreign relations, making treaties, and creating alliances. They were responsible for war policy, and controlled lands. By the 3rd century BCE they had full governing power in Rome. Not all senators held equal status however. Those selected by Censor did not have a right to vote or speak on the Senate floor. Senators earned the proper dignity and nobility to vote and speak on the floor by virtue of holding various offices such as Consul. In contrast to the Roman Empire, the Athenian empire dealt with economic affair. They passed laws and had the power to declare war. Rome’s Senate was more effective in terms of pleasing the citizens due to the foreign relation position opening a way of trade. Making alliances was very vital for keeping peace among the other
How did Rome become Great in History is a good question and I want to give you some ideas that I saw during my week reading. Historians divided Roman history into three categories: the kingdom of Rome ( beginning in the 8th century B.C.), the period of the Republic (beginning in 509 B.C.) and the period of the Empire ( beginning in 27 B.C.). All of these played a role in Rome becoming Great in History. Rome did not start off as a big Empire the rule most of the Middle East. Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of central Italy in the 8th century
Throughout time there have been a variety of leaders, who all had different leading types. Some have been more in control, others more relaxed, some had less power, other had more. Regardless, there are qualities in leaders that are more desirable than others. It is clear throughout history that the most desirable qualities in ancient leaders was tolerance. Part of what made tolerance such an important quality is what it did for the citizens under the emperor’s rule.
I have had 20 leaders during in my years in the Army. Some good and some bad, but none have left a lasting legacy that I would want to emulate. None until spring 2014, when CSM Roman took over as my Battalion Command Sergeant Major and changed my outlook on what a true expert and professional is supposed to exemplify. Due to my interaction with him, I have decided that CSM Gregory Roman is my leader of influence. If there were more leaders like CSM Roman, then the Army as we know it would be in a much better position.
Rome was a vast empire. At Rome’s peak the empire stretched nearly 1.7 million square miles and included most of southern Europe. To keep this vast empire organized the romans created a network of roadways or what we would call it today highways. This network would keep the empire connected with information and supplies to all the surrounding colonies and out post. These roadways contributed to the success of Rome’s power in 3 ways, its military force, trade, and communication. The military would serve as protection and expansion of the empire, trade would bring wealth to the nation and become powerful, communication would bring new ideas from the surrounding nations, new concepts and way of thinking. All these aspects when combined created one of the greatest empires known to man.
Some policies and institutions of the Roman Republic were useful to help them succeed in conquering first Italy and then the Mediterranean world. Before of the institution of the republic, the romans were a monarchy since their beginning and they were basically a pastoral people. Rome suffer several changes and improvements under the control of the Etruscan kings. The Etruscan were civilization settled north of Rome in Etruria, and they once had control over almost all the Italic peninsula. The Etruscans influences in Rome were profound, they transformed Rome from a pastoral community to a city (91). The Etruscan built the street and roads that help the development of temples, markets, shops, streets, and houses. They basically brought urbanization to Rome. It is fairly to say that the Rome republic was a fusion between the elements of the Etruscan civilization and the Rome elements. The combination of the different political institutions and policies made the Romans succeed in their conquest territories.
The Roman Empire was one of the largest empires the world has ever seen. The power and size they managed to obtain has been a constant subject of interest for historians and all those who are interested in history. Julius Caesar’s ascension to power marked the time from where the Romans steadily expanded their territory and by the time the Roman Republic dissolved and the Roman Empire emerged, the Empire had become so big that the Romans had then to face the problem of maintaining their empire. The Roman Empire maintained its power by
The legend of Roman Empire, the strongest empire lasted more than 1,000 years in regions of minor Asia, Northern Africa, Europe including Spain, Britain, german and Gaul, which now we call France, was not created in one single day. The stories of ancient gods, heroes, and myths are part of their splendid chronicle, they are both practical facts and fantasies. Much of what we know today about the historical foundations of Rome comes to us from ancient writers such as Livy and Herodotus, along with the findings of archeology. The early history of Rome, so deeply rooted in legend and mythology, is a Amix of fact, fiction, educated guesses and established notions on the conditions of the ancient
The Roman Republic was a “democratic” republic, which allowed first citizens to vote, and to choose their governors in the senate (Hence, their consuls). However, it was a nation ruled by its aristocracy, and, consequently, the entire Republic`s power was concentrated in a few individuals. Furthermore, the Senate was controlled by Patricians, which directed the government by using wealth to buy control and power over the decisions of the senate and the consuls. This situation aroused the inconformity of the people; as result, a civil war took place in the Republic (destroying it), and then the Roman Empire was born.
The Roman empire is considered one of the most powerful and longest lasting empire of all time by most historians. At its peak the Roman empire managed to take control and rule nearly the whole inhabited world at the time. Though their military achievements were outstanding the Romans also excelled at legislature. The Romans ran a governmental system which was most like a republic which the power was in the hand of the senators and patricians. The senators and patricians were mostly extremely rich elders of the community who linked themselves to gods. Though the people were the ones who voted for the senators the rich always voted who they wanted because they were the first to vote which made the senate corrupt since the lower classes barely got a say. Although the Roman empire was extremely successful historians are always doing research to figure out what elements led to its collapse. However, the Roman legislature, use of propaganda to sway public opinion, military power to conquer lands, and philosophy were essential reasons for the extended survival of the Roman empire.
To begin, the Roman style of governing had several counterbalancing roles that citizens were slotted upon. At the height of the hierarchy, were the Consuls. As their role is described by Polybius in an excerpt discussing the Roman Government, “The consuls, when they remain in Rome, before they lead out the armies into the field, are the masters of all public affairs ” (Thatcher). This statement alone shows how much power and influence these individuals held among the people. Holding both the key to the literal kingdom, these Consuls were supposed to be the fighting force that kept Barbarians out in the foreign frontiers, as well as the governing forces that held a final say