preview

Role Playing Paradigm

Decent Essays

Discussion The present research set out to test Nail et al (2010, March) theory that using a role-playing paradigm instead of deception as an adequate way of testing cognitive dissonance. To do this we replicated Nail et al. (2010, March) experiment using the paradigm of being stood up by Chris who was in a car accident (sufficient justification) or being stood up by Chris who received another invitation for dinner by a different friend (insufficient justification). Our findings were in support of Nail et al. (2010, March), with sufficient participants level of dissonance at (M= 2.49) and insufficient participants level dissonance at (M= 8.05). The research also tested the theory that having social support would reduce the dissonance. To do …show more content…

Internal forces may be at play in their responses. If a similar event had recently happened to them or a friend has never stood up the participant; this would influence their answers. There is also the potential that their answers may change by the day. As in Cialdini, Frost and Newsom study on preference for consistency (PFC), some participants may have a lower tolerance for inconsistency (high PFC) and would score Chris …show more content…

Meeting friends after being stood up was a form of positive social support. That support benefited Chris in getting a higher rating. But what if the friends were a negative influence and during dinner down graded Chris or even suggested you lash out? How much lower would Chris be rated even with sufficient justification? Now consider if your political party did not win the election. If you surround yourself with positive social support; people who agree and support your candidate; over dinner the conversation could include ideas for reform, the next plan of action and the way to make the best out of the next four years. This could benefit the country as a whole. But what would the conversation be with negative social support? The same like-minded people in a dinner conversation could end up in violent outburst in the streets. What is going to happen to the country if the negative social support out number the positive? The same theory could be applied to drug addicts. Most addicts understand that doing drugs is harmful to themselves and those that love them. This causes cognitive dissonance. To relieve this they search for social support; usually finding “friends” who use the same type of drug. Since this is encouraging the poor behavior it is not positive social support. Positive social support would be finding “friends” in group meetings

Get Access