Why is the Middle East and North Africa Resilient to Democracy?
Is Robust Authoritarian Regimes To Blame?
Why is Middle Eastern and North African regime keep in power so robust authoritarian regimes? Why is the Middle East and North Africa still so resistant to embrace democracy? While the number of democracies has practically doubled since 1972, the number of states on the path of democratization in this region has recorded a complete decline. As today, only two out of twenty-one countries are suitable as electoral democracies, down from three observed in 1972. Whereas the number of states labeled as free by Freedom House has doubled in the Americas and in the Asia-Pacific region, drastically improved in Africa, and increased exponentially
…show more content…
The lack of a robust civil society, a market-driven economy, satisfactory income and literacy levels, democratic neighbors, and democratic culture put in plain words the region's failure to democratize.
Neither any of those explanations are convincing. The Middle East and North Africa are in any circumstances unique in their poor aptitude to meet the prerequisites of democracy. In fact regions equally disadvantaged have however been able to make the transition. Civil society is infamously weak in sub-Saharan Africa, nevertheless twenty-three out of forty-two countries supported some degree of democratic transition between 1988 and 1994.
The commanding heights of the economy were fully under state direction in Eastern Europe preceding to the fall of the Berlin wall, however the great majority of countries in this area successfully carried through a transition during the 1990s. Poverty and inequality, along with geographic seclusion from the democratic epicenter, have described India, Mauritius, and Botswana, nonetheless these countries have successfully adopted democracy and its values. Moreover, many other bequests world cultures, particularly Catholicism and Confucianism, have at a distinct times been blamed for conflicting with democracy, nevertheless these cultural bequests have not stopped countries in Latin America, southern Europe, and East Asia from
…show more content…
It is not as the region has been denied of all democratic forces. It has actually experienced the neophyte emergence of civil society (human rights groups, professional associations, self-help groups), simply to see most of them either crushed or corporatized by the state. Statist regimes progressively liberalized their economies (frequently under pressure from international forces), but an independent political initiative by their new private sectors is usually reprimanded. Nevertheless, progressive interpretations of Islam that advocate democratic norms and ideals have been analyzed by Islamic theorists, only to be suppressed by hostile state elites. In any case a coercive state profoundly unfavorable to democratic reform has crushed initiatives propitious to
In the article “Democracy in Decline: How Washington Can Reverse the Tide,” the author, Larry Diamond, details the declination of democracy across the world as a global issue. Diamond explains that, following the Cold War, democracy became vibrant across the world. However, it slowly began to decline, which was seen in Kenya, Russia, Thailand, and Turkey. Additionally, other non-democratic states, particularly authoritarian regimes, are drifting further away from democracy, becoming less responsive to their people. Diamond explains that these authoritarian states are becoming less open because they are increasing their censorships and are arresting those who resist. Furthermore, these governments are also restricting organizations from outside communications and operations. Nearly a hundred laws have been enacted in the past four years restricting freedom of assembly in governments across the world.
Larry Diamond's presentation explores the question of why there are no Arab democracies in the Middle East and North Africa. He shows us the relatively stagnant levels of democratic freedoms that have been the norm in the region for the past several decades. Diamond gives us a multitude of potential explanations for the absence of a sustainable democracy.
Fourth, the definition of the word "democracy" has changed. The way Americans see the word doesn't refer to a static system as it once did, it is ever changing and improving.
While the aftermath of World War II is often referred to as one of the primary creators of deep rooted turmoil in the Middle East region, the effects of the Cold War and the United States often over-zealous battle against communism is just as much a contributor if not more. The Arab world and the Middle East region were clearly going through quite an extraordinary period throughout World War II and its conclusion, primarily with the creation of most of the states we recognize today and struggling with the continuation of colonialism. These factors set the stage for the emergence of strong nationalist sentiments and Pan-Arab movements across the Middle East. Unfortunately, and much to the detriment of the region, the leaders of these young
Half a millennium ago, kingdoms were all the rage and those not under monarchial rule were savages and uncivilized creatures. In 500 years, democracy may not be the ideal Western government. We could, for say, come to the great realization that we should be ruled by artificial intelligence. It may be popular now to say that democracy is the best form of government, but that may not be true for the West in the future and it may even not be true for some parts of our present world. Some cultures would reject democracy, like some countries in the Middle East such as Afghanistan, where the U.S. is still attempting to prop up a democracy, despite Afghanistan’s high place on the Fragile States Index, by The Fund for Peace, with a score of 107.9, putting them at number 6 out of 178 measured countries. By this ranking, they fail in many aspects as a nation-state, such as protection.
In the Middle East, each country has it’s own form of government. These forms of governments have been consistently changing throughout time. Throughout all the revolutions and overthrows, the national identity of the Middle East has slowly changed, some parts more than others. Over many years, overthrows in countries such as Egypt and Libya have led to a more democratic government. However, many other countries such as Iran and Iraq have remained more oppressive. The Middle East is still changing to this day. For example, Egypt recently overthrew their president Hosni Mubarak. There are also many protests currently going on in Libya.
With the current turmoil in the Middle East caused by ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq), a lot of ground that the Middle Eastern government gained in democracy through US involvement and deployment is now being lost. There are mixed
A revolution has begun by the people in the Middle East against their long time dictators. The domino effect began first with Tunisia then Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen, and Libya. Thousands of protestors were gathered on the streets with posters, shouting for change and democracy. Why would there be protests unless the people are unsatisfied with the way the country is governed. Why would they go against their dictator unless they feel they have no rights and that they have no voice. Unlimited power should never be given to one person; the chances of corruption are very high because power can change even the most virtuous individual. That is why the path of a dictatorial country is a path of strife, oppression and economical downfall.
East Asia at one time was considered the nucleus of Authoritarian rule. Recently there have been milestones towards developing a properly functioning democracy. Japan at one-time was considered the only democracy, but in recent years, South Korea and
The citizens of Kashfar have lived under numerous military dictatorships in their recent history. Although recent attempts have been made at instituting democracy, all have failed and the nation remains under military rule. This failure could have stemmed from multiple areas, a misdiagnosis of what ails Kashfar, misaligned institutions, premature release from constitutional medicine, and the advertisement of western ideals and political structures upon the states. Any combination of these aspects has proven to be devastating to an ailing state such as Kashfar. Through regression analysis, we have determined that political pluralism and participation, functioning of government, freedom of expression and belief, and rule of law are the
The term “Arab Spring” has emerged in academic literature as well as in the general media from about early 2011. It refers to the “awakening” of some Arab nations and the movements to replace authoritarian regimes with democratic ones. The theme of “spring” and “awakening” seems to have been borrowed from the 1989 reform movements in the former Eastern-block nations, such as in the former German Democratic Republic or Hungary. However, this comparison has been criticised by some analysts since both the circumstances which have led to these movements as well as the outcome of these reform efforts seem to differ quite a lot. Yet, the Arab Spring term seems to be still widely used and even found an extension in the creation of the term Arab Winter which refers to events that happened in 2012 in some Arab countries during which these reform movements seemed to have “cooled-off” and particular nations, such as Egypt, attempted to go back to the status-quo of the pre-2011 era.
We must question to what extent democracy relies on external factors of stability in order to be accepted as legitimate. I would very much argue that the wealth and stable economy of each democratic country plays a large part in its citizens accepting democracy as a legitimate governmental system. Let us first look at the UK, Britain has always had a strong democratic nature to the country and relies on the electorate to vote for the MP’S in the House of Commons. However in late 2010 the London riots shocked the world and showed how the legitimacy of democracy relies on prosperity of the economic situation of a country and when this does not exist it creates a social backlash devaluing the legitimacy of the democracy. Similarly grease one of the oldest democracies in the world has also felt this effect and now the government there has all but collapsed all due the financial support of the democracy failing sending the country into mass chaos.
In recent months we have seen political unrest in Tunisia, Egypt and other Middle Eastern countries. In each of these countries the political leadership had amassed immense power and was using these powers to restrain and limit their countrymen from development. The ruling class clearly had formed a political structure with a clear agenda to inhibit the growth of their fellow citizens. In the past few decades, people from these countries have endured structural violence due to political hegemony. Exposure to western media has made the people realize the advantage of distributed power. Hence these countries are witnessing a surge of protest, with people fighting against the system. Parsons emphasizes on the distribution of political power and its effects throughout his
The Arab Spring has been a life changing phenomena, not only for the people who are attempting to overthrow their governments but for political scientists everywhere. The events originating in the North African country of Tunisia have led to the snowballing of several other Middle Eastern, predominantly Muslim, nation states. The figurative breaking point might have finally been reached as the oppressed peoples of the Middle East have risen up to overthrow long-standing dictatorial governments in hopes of revolutionary change; change that is subject to the will of the people.
Over the last century, the Middle East has been the location of ethnic rivalry, political and economic instability, religious conflict, territorial dispute and war. Much of this tension in the Middle East comes from the various interpretations of Islam and how the religion should be applied to politics and society. Over the last ten years, the United States and their allies have pushed to promote democracy in the Middle East. However, they too have many obstacles they must overcome. They face problems such as the compatibility of Islamic law and democracy, the issue of women’s rights, and there is always the problem of how to go about implementing a democratic reform in these countries. Many initially would assume that it is only the