The established definition of rituximab resistance is the lack of response or the progression within 6 months of treatment to a rituximab-containing regimen.11 Obvious disease progression during rituximab therapy is the most clearly defined form of resistance. Patients who may experience tumor shrinkage have some degree of rituximab sensitivity but are often classified as “resistant” if they fail to achieve either a partial or complete response. Numerous pathways of tumor resistance have been elucidated with conventional chemotherapeutic agents. In some cases, these discoveries have translated into specific interventions aimed at preventing or overcoming tumor resistance.11 Surprisingly, little is known about the determinants of responsiveness …show more content…
Tumor cells are capable of blocking the activation of complements via membrane complement-regulatory proteins (mCRP), such as CD46, CD55, and CD59. These inhibitory proteins disrupt the complement cascade or the assembly of the membrane attack complex and are widely expressed in nearly all types of cancer, which may confer protection against CDC.16 Some rituximab-resistant cell lines have been reported to express high levels of mCRP as a consequence of selective pressure from repeated exposure to rituximab.17 If mCRP are neutralized with blocking antibodies, the efficacy of rituximab is greatly enhanced.18 However, mCRP serve an important regulatory role in protecting normal cells from uncontrolled complement-mediated cytotoxicity, thus restricting the clinical application of mCRP blockade. Currently, there are no clinical agents capable of specifically blocking cancer-associated mCRP while retaining mCRP protection of normal cells. However, it has been observed that the synergy between rituximab and fludarabine seems to partially mediate the ability of fludarabine to downregulate CD55, which increases the susceptibility of cells to rituximab-mediated CDC.19 Exposure to rituximab may also exhaust the store of complement proteins. Therefore, rituximab “resistance” might be somewhat mediated by the depletion of the necessary effector molecules. Klepfish et al. infused rituximab-resistant Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients with plasma, complete with abundant complement proteins, in combination with doses of rituximab. This approach resulted in “a rapid and dramatic clinical response in all patients,” supporting the hypothesis that complement depletion plays a clinically significant role in rituximab resistance.19 Although complement depletion seems to improve rituximab killing via ADCC, it may also play a role in
Significance: understanding the mechanism of drug resistance in cancer leads to developing more potent drugs.
The immaturity of the data is underscored by the disposition at the time of analysis. Patients were more likely to have discontinued based on adverse events than to have had disease progress or be continuing therapy. Although tolerability looked better when only patients receiving tremelimumab 1 mg were analyzed, even in that group, 30% of patients had a related grade > 3 adverse event, with 16% of patients discontinuing due to an adverse event and 4% dying from the study therapy. For comparison, in the studies that led to approval of pembrolizumab and nivolumab, grade > 3 related adverse events were seen in 7-10.5%, adverse events led to discontinuation of study therapy in 0.2-3.8% and death was related to study treatment in 0-0.3%.2, 3, 4
The exact mechanism of Rituximab in LGI1 patients is still unclear. One possible explanation is that Rituximab targets CD20 on B cells, so it can attenuate B cells and deplete antibodies.[19]
A key factor in the development of tumors is the ability of cancerous cells to evade recognition from the bodies’ natural defense against cancer, the immune system. Immunotherapies effectively block the pathways that shield cancerous cells from being identified, and thus the promote the bodies own anti-tumor response. However, one challenge to immunotherapy has been its combination with chemotherapy, the mainstay of cancer treatment. While chemotherapy is extremely effective in stopping the rapid division of cancerous cells, its toxic immunosuppressive side-effect make it difficult to combine with
Three months after Accelerated approval on 18 February 2005, FDA shockingly received information from Biogen Idec of one confirmed death and one possible case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients receiving natalizumab for multiple sclerosis. There was a clear progressive association between treatment with natalizumab and the development of PML. As a selective blocker of adhesion molecules, natalizumab prevents the migration of immunocompetent T-cells across biological barriers and suppresses T-cell mediated immune responses. Risk of infections increases due to this therapeutic effect. PML is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease usually caused by opportunistic infection with John Cunningham virus, a papova virus, and occasionally after simian
Entyvio reduces the effects of a substance in the body that can cause inflammation. Entyvio is used in adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), or moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Entyvio treats active disease and may help keep UC or Crohn's symptoms under control long term. Vedolizumab may also reduce the need for steroid medicines in helping to control symptoms long term. Entyvio is usually given after other medicines have been tried without success.
The regulatory strategic plan is a key to the development of a medicinal product. During drug development, the regulatory strategy is one of the most critical factors for the successful approval of the medicinal product. In addition, the regulatory strategy plan can optimize labeling across several counties in order to maximize market success. The purpose of this regulatory strategy plan is to establish a good understanding of the preclinical, clinical and marketing application regulatory requirements for the development of a biosimilar of Rituximab in the United States, Canada, France and India.
The complement system is a part of the immune system that is established in the blood and functions to keep the body healthy. The complement system consists of more than thirty proteins that flow throughout the blood and attack bacteria, viruses, and any foreign invader found throughout the body. More specifically, the complement system helps pathogen cells commit apoptosis, have inflammation, lyse, and opsonization. There are nine major complement proteins, which are C1-C9, that act a little different in each of the three pathways: the alternative, classical, and the lectin complement pathway. The difference between the lectin and the classical pathway is that in the lectin pathway, C1q is not involved but instead a mannan binding protein
Cancer is the uncontrollable division and growth of abnormal cells resulting in formation of an aggressive tumour. In some forms of Breast cancer, the cells proliferate uncontrollably due to over-expression of the protein HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2); a receptor embedded within the membrane of cells, allowing for the transfer of signals outside to inside the cell. Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody administered through intravenous infusion, to be taken on its own or in combination with one or more chemotherapy regimens. It reduces risk of the cancer reoccurring or spreading by inhibiting the effects of HER2, and enhancing the body’s immune system.
Lenvatinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1–3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1–4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α, ret proto-oncogene, and v-kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog signaling pathways.1-4 The targeting of multiple angiogenic pathways may circumvent compensatory mechanisms that are upregulated when only a single angiogenic pathway is inhibited.5 Lenvatinib has been extensively evaluated in phase 1 studies in both healthy subjects and in patients with solid tumors,6, 7 as well as in phase 2 studies in patients with various types of thyroid cancer (Eisai data on file).8
Antimicrobial resistant has been called one of the world's most pressing public health problems. Every time a person takes antibiotics, sensitive bacteria are killed, but resistant ones may be left to grow stronger and multiply. Although antibiotics can help treat bacterial infections, a possible side effect is that they can strengthen certain bacterial strains. Antibiotics are supposed to be used for bacterial infections, but are wrongly being used for both viral and bacterial infections. When we use antibiotics on viral infections, deadly bacteria multiplies and becomes stronger. We can fix this problem by using antibiotics for bacterial infections only.
Carfilzomib, is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012, either as a single agent or in combination with other known anti-myeloma treatments in the therapy of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RR-MM). Currently, carfilzomib is also investigated in the de novo setting of
Celecoxib is a selective COX-2 inhibitor, is potential applied for the aggravated treatment of colonic diseases such as colorectal cancer and colitis [7, 8]. The possible mechanism of action of celecoxib is COX-2 specific inhibiting agent that inhibits the conversion of arachidonic acid to the prostaglandins that mediate normal homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and platelets and that are formed under control of COX-1[9]. Human clinical studies performed to evaluate the safe of celecoxib in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have no conclusion result yet. Thus, the controversy regarding risks and benefits of celecoxib for treatments of IBD is still going on [10]. Therefore the great caution should be used in treating
By maintaining Mr. Ryan in the control group and withholding PLX4032, we realize that this decision would only cause Mr. Ryan to suffer, and to die prematurely. Despite dacarbazine being one of the few FDA approved chemotherapy drugs, and thereby labeled the standard form of care in the treatment of metastatic melanoma for over 3 decades, we see that historically this intervention has proven to be ineffective (Bhatia, Tykodi, & Thompson, 2009). Through a pooled analysis, research indicates that this drug has only a 15.3% objective response rate, with only 2% of patients living past 6 years (Bhatia et. al., 2009). Likewise, the side effects implicated with toxic treatment are inevitable with dacarbazine, so subjecting Mr. Ryan to this regimen of treatment causes needless suffering. Even doctors involved in the study, including Dr. Keith Flaherty of Massachusetts General Hospital, have expressed their hatred toward dacarbazine by stating that they would prefer to never give a dose again in their life, and by lobbying for chemotherapy patients worsening in the trial to be positioned in a new trial headed by PLX4032’s competitor
IRAEs tend to follow a predictable pattern, with rashes and GI toxicity seen early and liver toxicity or endocrinopathies seen later in the treatment course. [13] Certain IRAEs appear to be specific to certain cancers, with pneumonitis being more prevalent in lung cancer patients and higher rates of vitiligo and colitis observed in melanoma patients receiving infusions immune check point inhibitors.[14] In general, anti-PD-1 antibodies, Nivolumab/Pembrolizumab, are more tolerable (10-15% rate of grade 3 [severe] and 4 [life-threatening] AEs) compared to Ipilimumab (20–30% rate of grade 3-4 AEs) and or combination PD-1 + CTLA-4 blockade therapy (55% rate of AEs).[14] Immune modulators (IMMs) are employed for high grade IRAEs and most patients achieve control with steroids or infliximab for steroid-refractory toxicity.[3] Fortunately, it has been shown that treating IRAEs with steroids/IMMs has yet to show any detrimental effect on the efficacy of immune check point therapy in terms of OS and